09.08.2013 Views

Women at Work in the Deuteronomistic History - International Voices ...

Women at Work in the Deuteronomistic History - International Voices ...

Women at Work in the Deuteronomistic History - International Voices ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

HIDE AND SEEK: MISCELLANEOUS WOMEN | 215<br />

rel<strong>at</strong>ed roles had already been exchanged from <strong>the</strong> very beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g with her<br />

bro<strong>the</strong>r Jon<strong>at</strong>han. 154 Sad th<strong>in</strong>g, always to be on <strong>the</strong> wrong place!<br />

Ano<strong>the</strong>r clue may come from Bowman’s study. Look<strong>in</strong>g <strong>at</strong> Michal’s f<strong>at</strong>e<br />

more broadly, Bowman rel<strong>at</strong>es two political decisions by David to ga<strong>in</strong> control<br />

over <strong>the</strong> whole people by seek<strong>in</strong>g allegiance from <strong>the</strong> “Saulide,” nor<strong>the</strong>rn<br />

regions, namely, br<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> ark to Jerusalem and claim<strong>in</strong>g devolution of his<br />

former wife Michal. Nei<strong>the</strong>r had YHWH’s approval, thus br<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> ark to a<br />

stalem<strong>at</strong>e and Michal to eternal barrenness. He asserts th<strong>at</strong>,<br />

…both efforts result <strong>in</strong> failure so long as David is act<strong>in</strong>g upon his own<br />

<strong>in</strong>iti<strong>at</strong>ive. Whereas God eventually authorizes David’s rega<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g possession of<br />

<strong>the</strong> ark, he apparently does not authorize his rega<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g possession of Michal.<br />

The narr<strong>at</strong>ive conta<strong>in</strong>s no story of birth to this barren woman…<br />

This suggests th<strong>at</strong> God himself will legitim<strong>at</strong>e <strong>the</strong> monarchy of David.<br />

Legitim<strong>at</strong>ion will not come through an alliance with <strong>the</strong> house of Saul, nor will<br />

it cont<strong>in</strong>ue through its progeny. 155<br />

This is also, needless to say, <strong>the</strong> official view, s<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>the</strong> hero is David and<br />

not Saul nor, even less, Michal. Literary work or piece of reality, it is sad th<strong>at</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> woman’s body and sexuality are <strong>the</strong> b<strong>at</strong>tlefield between f<strong>at</strong>her and husband<br />

and between <strong>the</strong>m and God. Not <strong>the</strong> first time, nei<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> last one.<br />

תוננוקמ — Wail<strong>in</strong>g <strong>Women</strong> or Lamenters<br />

The term <strong>in</strong> question, תוננוקמ is <strong>the</strong> po‘lel fem<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>e plural participle of a<br />

denom<strong>in</strong><strong>at</strong>ive verb ןיק, “to s<strong>in</strong>g a dirge, lament, wail.” The verb is parsed <strong>in</strong><br />

different forms along six texts, of which two acknowledge female performers,<br />

none <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> DtrH. Ezekiel 32:16 closes a lament<strong>at</strong>ion on Egypt by <strong>in</strong>dic<strong>at</strong><strong>in</strong>g th<strong>at</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> “daughters of <strong>the</strong> n<strong>at</strong>ions” will s<strong>in</strong>g it. The o<strong>the</strong>r occurrence of <strong>the</strong> term is<br />

also a prophetic <strong>in</strong>vective, this time not aga<strong>in</strong>st a foreign n<strong>at</strong>ion, but directed<br />

towards Judah itself. YHWH warns, it is time to call upon <strong>the</strong> wail<strong>in</strong>g women<br />

over <strong>the</strong> general destruction of Zion. In typical Hebrew poetry, two terms are set<br />

<strong>in</strong> synonymic parallelism, with repetition of one verb (vary<strong>in</strong>g its spell<strong>in</strong>g) and<br />

<strong>in</strong>ternal chiasmus:<br />

154 Adele Berl<strong>in</strong>, “Characteriz<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>in</strong> Biblical Narr<strong>at</strong>ive: David’s Wives,” <strong>in</strong> Tell<strong>in</strong>g Queen Michal's<br />

Story, 91–93; Lilian Kle<strong>in</strong>, “Michal, The Barren Wife,” <strong>in</strong> A Fem<strong>in</strong>ist Companion to Samuel and<br />

K<strong>in</strong>gs (ed. Athalya Brenner; 2nd series; Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press, 2000), 38 n.5 however,<br />

believes it is, r<strong>at</strong>her than a gender issue, one of docility and control. Bowman, “Fortune,” 99, affirms<br />

th<strong>at</strong> “David’s is a flawed but favored character, while Michal’s is ever victimized but never<br />

v<strong>in</strong>dic<strong>at</strong>ed.”<br />

155 Bowman, “Fortune,” 117. Also Haase does a political analysis of <strong>the</strong> episode.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!