Technology Status Report: In Situ Flushing - CLU-IN

More documents

Recommendations

Info

In Situ Flushing Project Summaries GWRTAC Case Study Database 25153. presented at the SPE International Symposium on Oilfield Chemistry, New Orleans, Louisiana, March 2-5, pp. 33-44. Pitts, M.J., Surkalo, H., and Wyatt, K. 1995. "Design and Field Implementation of Alkaline- Surfactant-Polymer Chemical Enhanced Oil Recovery Systems." Proceedings of the UNITAR International Conference on Heavy Crude and Tar Sands, February 12-17, Vol. 1, pp. 795-803. Rice University, 1997: Technology Practices Manual for Surfactants and Cosolvents, Rice University, 6100 Main Street, Houston, TX 77005-1892, February 1997 Sale, T.C., Piontek, K.R., and Pitts, M.J. 1989. "Chemically Enhanced In-Situ Soil Washing," Proceedings of NWWA/API Conference on Petroleum Hydrocarbons and Organic Chemicals in Ground Water: Prevention, Detection, and Restoration, November 15-17. Sale, T.C., and Piontek, K.R. 1992. "A Decade of Remedial Action at a Former Wood-Treating Facility." Proceedings of Water Environment Federation 65th Annual Conference and Expositions on Detection and Restoration of DNAPLs in Ground Water at Hazardous Waste Sites. New Orleans, Louisiana, September 20-24 Sale, T.C., and Applegate, D. 1996. "Mobile NAPL Recovery: Conceptual, Field and Mathematical Considerations." Revised manuscript submitted to Ground Water. Sale, T.C., and Applegate, D. 1996. "Oil Recovery at a Former Wood-Treating Facility," Water Environment Research, Vol. 68, No. 7, pp. 1116-1122. Sale, T.C., Pitts, M., Piontek, K., and Wyatt, K. 1996. "In Situ Remediation of DNAPL Compounds in Low Permeability Media Fate/Transport, In Situ Control Technologies, and Risk Reduction." In Chemically Enhanced In Situ Recovery. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, ORNL/TM-13305. U.S. EPA, Oct. 1991: Eng. Bull. In Situ Soil Flushing, EPA 540-2-91-021, U.S. EPA OERR, Washington, DC Ground-Water Remediation Technologies Analysis Center Operated by Concurrent Technologies Corporation Appendix - Page 58 of 164 Copyright GWRTAC 1998 Revision 1 Tuesday, November 17, 1998
In Situ Flushing Project Summaries GWRTAC Case Study Database GWRTAC ID: FLSH0027 Project Name: Lee Chemical, Liberty, MO City: Liberty State/Province: MO Primary GWRTAC Personal Communication Source (Name/Organization): Project Summary: Steve Kinser U.S. EPA Report(s)/Publication(s) (GWRTAC Source): U.S. EPA, Nov. 1996: Inn. Trtmt. Techs.: Ann. Status Rpt. (8th Ed.), EPA 542-R-96-010, No. 8, U.S. EPA OSWER (5102G) TIO, Wash., DC Internet URL http://www.epa.gov/superfund/index.htm The following text is from notes from an April 1997 and July 1998 conversations with the EPA RPM: The site is a Missouri-lead site, and is located one mile away from the Kansas City reach of the Missouri River; river loses water through this reach. Missouri River bottom sediments are contaminated with chlorinated solvents. Flushing project is targeting vadose zone by re-circulating untreated groundwater through four infiltration fields on site. There is no shallow confining layer beneath the site. The city wellfield is located significant distance from site, however, a preferential flowpath exists between one of these wells and the site. Water is pumped from one extraction well; approximately 700,000 gallons per day of water is pumped and infiltrated; there is no on-site treatment prior to re-injection. Over one recent three month period (April, May, June 1996), the total water applied to the site was a little over two million gallons. The site is to be remediated to MCLs. Performance results are not yet available. A five year review will be conducted in June 1998; EPA has not yet received a copy of the five year report, but indicated that the flushing system is operating without any problems. The city water supply has not been impacted by the operation. Project costs were not available from reference source. Report(s)/Publication(s) (Additional Information Sources): U.S. EPA, Nov. 1996: Inn. Trtmt. Techs.: Ann. Status Rpt. (8th Ed.), EPA 542-R-96-010, No. 8, U.S. EPA OSWER (5102G) TIO, Wash., DC Internet URL http://www.epa.gov/superfund/index.htm Ground-Water Remediation Technologies Analysis Center Operated by Concurrent Technologies Corporation Appendix - Page 59 of 164 Copyright GWRTAC 1998 Revision 1 Tuesday, November 17, 1998
Page 1 and 2:
Technology Status Report Technology
Page 3 and 4:
ABSTRACT This technology status rep
Page 5 and 6:
LIST OF TABLES Table Title Page 1 I
Page 7 and 8:
1.0 INTRODUCTION / PURPOSE OF STATU
Page 9 and 10:
a laboratory-scale project. As illu
Page 11 and 12:
3.1 Flushing Solutions 3.0 ANALYSIS
Page 13 and 14:
(approximately eight) full-scale pr
Page 15 and 16:
Table 1. In Situ Flushing - Summary
Page 17 and 18:
Page 19 and 20:
Page 21 and 22:
Table 3 In Situ Flushing - Geology
Page 23 and 24:
Page 25 and 26:
Page 27 and 28:
Table 4 In Situ Flushing - Recovere
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34:
Full-Scale/Commercial 26% Figure 2.
Page 35 and 36:
Site Remediation 25% Figure 4. In S
Page 37 and 38:
NAPL Removal 34% Figure 6. In Situ
Page 39 and 40:
Figure 8. In Situ Flushing - Distri
Page 41 and 42:
Number of Projects 35 30 25 20 15 1
Page 43 and 44:
Number of Case Studies 45 40 35 30
Page 45 and 46:
25 ft and 50 ft and 10 ft and 100 f
Page 47 and 48:
Unconfined Aquifer 65% Figure 16. I
Page 49 and 50:
In Situ Flushing Project Summaries
Page 51 and 52:
Page 53 and 54:
Page 55 and 56: In Situ Flushing Project Summaries
Page 105: In Situ Flushing Project Summaries
Page 157 and 158:
Page 159 and 160:
Page 161 and 162:
Page 163 and 164:
Page 165 and 166:
Page 167 and 168:
Page 169 and 170:
Page 171 and 172:
Page 173 and 174:
Page 175 and 176:
Page 177 and 178:
Page 179 and 180:
Page 181 and 182:
Page 183 and 184:
Page 185 and 186:
Page 187 and 188:
Page 189 and 190:
Page 191 and 192:
Page 193 and 194:
Page 195 and 196:
Page 197 and 198:
Page 199 and 200:
Page 201 and 202:
Page 203 and 204:
Page 205 and 206:
Page 207 and 208:
Page 209 and 210:
Page 211 and 212:
show all

Technology Status Report: In Situ Flushing - CLU-IN

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?