13.08.2013 Views

Technology Status Report: In Situ Flushing - CLU-IN

Technology Status Report: In Situ Flushing - CLU-IN

Technology Status Report: In Situ Flushing - CLU-IN

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>In</strong> <strong>Situ</strong> <strong>Flushing</strong> Project Summaries<br />

GWRTAC Case Study Database<br />

to as a Waterloo Barrier system. The poorly sorted sand and gravel aquifer is approximately 15 to<br />

20 ft below the surface to the clay aquitard. Four injection and three extraction wells are located on<br />

the opposite 3 m sides of each cell. Well screens are variable from the clay layer to above the<br />

water table. <strong>In</strong> the interior are 12 evenly spaced sampling wells, each with nested ports at 5<br />

vertical depths. The saturated zone pore volume (PV) within each cell is variable from 1,000 to<br />

2,500 gallons per cell. The hydraulic conductivity of the saturated potion of the upper sand and<br />

gravel unit at OU1 is 10-1 to 10-2 cm/sec based on aquifer test data, and 10-2 to 10-5 cm/sec<br />

based on slug test data. For all of the flushing experiments (those with surfactants, cosolvents,<br />

and cyclodexdrin), the flushing rate will be approximately one pore volume per day. Prior to and<br />

after treatment of each cell, a partitioning tracer test has or will be performed. The mix of tracers<br />

will be designed according to the expected volume of NAPL within the cell before and after<br />

treatment. Among the tracers, hexanol and dimethylpentanol may be included.<br />

For the test at Cell 8, OU 1, conducted in the summer of 1996, a field trial involving flushing with a<br />

microemulsion precursor (a mixture of a nonionic surfactant and alcohol) was conducted. A<br />

mixuture of 3.5 wt% Brij 91 [Polyoxyethylent (10) Oleyl Ether]) and 2.5 wt% n-pentanol was used to<br />

generate a stable, single-phase microemulsion (SPME) of LNAPL in the aqueous solution. <strong>In</strong> the<br />

single-phase microemulsion SPME process, a surfactant and co-surfactant (alcohol) mixture is<br />

added to the subsurface, where a water-continuous, low-viscosity, oil-in-water microemulsion forms<br />

on contact with residual NAPL. This Winsor Type I microemulsion can be diluted in water and<br />

transported through porous media as a single-phase, low-viscosity fluid. <strong>In</strong> contrast with micellar<br />

solubilization, which typically requires 10 - 20 pore volumes of flushing and selectively solubilizes<br />

NAPL components, fewer pore volumes of the surfactant/alcohol mixture are needed to<br />

microemulsify all NAPL components uniformly. The SPME study was divided into three separate<br />

phases: Laboratory Precursor Selection, Field Implementation, and Numerical Simulations.<br />

The first phase of this study was to select a surfactant and cosurfactant which together form the<br />

microemulsion precursor, which would produce a low-viscosity, single-phase microemulsion on<br />

contact with the complex, multi-component NAPL found at the field site. Eighty-six surfactants and<br />

a number of alcohols were screened, with enhanced NAPL solubilization and low-viscosity (

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!