13.08.2013 Views

Technology Status Report: In Situ Flushing - CLU-IN

Technology Status Report: In Situ Flushing - CLU-IN

Technology Status Report: In Situ Flushing - CLU-IN

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>In</strong> <strong>Situ</strong> <strong>Flushing</strong> Project Summaries<br />

GWRTAC Case Study Database<br />

GWRTAC ID: FLSH0007<br />

Project Name: Cross Brothers Pail, Pembroke, IL<br />

City: Pembroke State/Province: IL<br />

Primary GWRTAC Personal<br />

Communication Source<br />

(Name/Organization):<br />

Project Summary:<br />

Sherry Biachin<br />

U.S. EPA<br />

<strong>Report</strong>(s)/Publication(s) (GWRTAC Source):<br />

<strong>In</strong>ternet URL http://www.epa.gov/superfund/index.htm<br />

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1991: Engineering Bulletin <strong>In</strong> <strong>Situ</strong> Soil <strong>Flushing</strong>,<br />

EPA/540/2-91/021, U.S. EPA Office of Emergency and Remedial Response (OERR), Washington,<br />

DC 20460, Office of Research and Development (ORD), Cincinnati, Ohio 45268, 8 pp., October<br />

1991.<br />

The following text is from notes taken from <strong>In</strong>ternet URL http://www.epa.gov/superfund/index.htm,<br />

May 1997 and July 1998 conversations with the U.S. EPA RPM, and from July 1998 conversations<br />

with the PRP spokesperson, and a technical team member.<br />

Site is located approximately 14 miles east of the town of Kankakee, IL, within Pembroke Twp.,<br />

Kankakee County. Site consists of a 20-acre parcel of land. Cross Brothers operated a drum and<br />

pail reclaiming operation at the site from 1961 until 1980. The operation employes a crude process<br />

to incinerate the residue material contained in drums and pails received for reconditioning.<br />

Essentially, the operation consisted of inverting the containers to allow the residue material to drain<br />

out onto the ground. Then solvent would be added to the containers to dissolve any remaining<br />

residue. Throughout the process, the operation was haphazard, allowing indiscriminant dumping of<br />

great quantities of residues (largely dyes, pigments, inks, and solvents). PCB-contaminated soil<br />

was excavated.<br />

Wells are pumped to remove ground-water, and treatment occurs above-ground. Re-injection of<br />

treated groundwater for flushing of source area vadose zone contamination occurs via a sprayfield,<br />

with sprinklers, and for flushing the saturated portion of the aquifer, occurs though injection wells<br />

downgradient of the source area. Extraction and injection wells are also utilized to maintain<br />

hydraulic control at the downgradient edge of the contaminant plume. The source area is<br />

approximately four to six acres in extent. areal extent. A confining clay layer is present at 45 to 50<br />

feet below the ground surface, and the water table is variable with season, from four to eight feet<br />

below the ground surface. There is not a slurry wall or other physical construct present at the site<br />

acting as an engineered barrier. <strong>In</strong>jection and extraction wells immediately downgradient of the<br />

source area, and injection and extraction wells immediately downgradient of the downgradient<br />

(leading) edge of the contaminant plume are installed to a depth one foot above the confining clay<br />

layer. The targeted unconfined aquifer consists of very well sorted, fine-grained sand. Standard<br />

MCLs are the treatment goal.<br />

Ground-Water Remediation Technologies Analysis Center<br />

Operated by Concurrent Technologies Corporation<br />

Appendix - Page 12 of 164<br />

Copyright GWRTAC 1998<br />

Revision 1<br />

Tuesday, November 17, 1998

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!