Technology Status Report: In Situ Flushing - CLU-IN
Technology Status Report: In Situ Flushing - CLU-IN
Technology Status Report: In Situ Flushing - CLU-IN
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>In</strong> <strong>Situ</strong> <strong>Flushing</strong> Project Summaries<br />
GWRTAC Case Study Database<br />
GWRTAC ID: FLSH0007<br />
Project Name: Cross Brothers Pail, Pembroke, IL<br />
City: Pembroke State/Province: IL<br />
Primary GWRTAC Personal<br />
Communication Source<br />
(Name/Organization):<br />
Project Summary:<br />
Sherry Biachin<br />
U.S. EPA<br />
<strong>Report</strong>(s)/Publication(s) (GWRTAC Source):<br />
<strong>In</strong>ternet URL http://www.epa.gov/superfund/index.htm<br />
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1991: Engineering Bulletin <strong>In</strong> <strong>Situ</strong> Soil <strong>Flushing</strong>,<br />
EPA/540/2-91/021, U.S. EPA Office of Emergency and Remedial Response (OERR), Washington,<br />
DC 20460, Office of Research and Development (ORD), Cincinnati, Ohio 45268, 8 pp., October<br />
1991.<br />
The following text is from notes taken from <strong>In</strong>ternet URL http://www.epa.gov/superfund/index.htm,<br />
May 1997 and July 1998 conversations with the U.S. EPA RPM, and from July 1998 conversations<br />
with the PRP spokesperson, and a technical team member.<br />
Site is located approximately 14 miles east of the town of Kankakee, IL, within Pembroke Twp.,<br />
Kankakee County. Site consists of a 20-acre parcel of land. Cross Brothers operated a drum and<br />
pail reclaiming operation at the site from 1961 until 1980. The operation employes a crude process<br />
to incinerate the residue material contained in drums and pails received for reconditioning.<br />
Essentially, the operation consisted of inverting the containers to allow the residue material to drain<br />
out onto the ground. Then solvent would be added to the containers to dissolve any remaining<br />
residue. Throughout the process, the operation was haphazard, allowing indiscriminant dumping of<br />
great quantities of residues (largely dyes, pigments, inks, and solvents). PCB-contaminated soil<br />
was excavated.<br />
Wells are pumped to remove ground-water, and treatment occurs above-ground. Re-injection of<br />
treated groundwater for flushing of source area vadose zone contamination occurs via a sprayfield,<br />
with sprinklers, and for flushing the saturated portion of the aquifer, occurs though injection wells<br />
downgradient of the source area. Extraction and injection wells are also utilized to maintain<br />
hydraulic control at the downgradient edge of the contaminant plume. The source area is<br />
approximately four to six acres in extent. areal extent. A confining clay layer is present at 45 to 50<br />
feet below the ground surface, and the water table is variable with season, from four to eight feet<br />
below the ground surface. There is not a slurry wall or other physical construct present at the site<br />
acting as an engineered barrier. <strong>In</strong>jection and extraction wells immediately downgradient of the<br />
source area, and injection and extraction wells immediately downgradient of the downgradient<br />
(leading) edge of the contaminant plume are installed to a depth one foot above the confining clay<br />
layer. The targeted unconfined aquifer consists of very well sorted, fine-grained sand. Standard<br />
MCLs are the treatment goal.<br />
Ground-Water Remediation Technologies Analysis Center<br />
Operated by Concurrent Technologies Corporation<br />
Appendix - Page 12 of 164<br />
Copyright GWRTAC 1998<br />
Revision 1<br />
Tuesday, November 17, 1998