13.08.2013 Views

Technology Status Report: In Situ Flushing - CLU-IN

Technology Status Report: In Situ Flushing - CLU-IN

Technology Status Report: In Situ Flushing - CLU-IN

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>In</strong> <strong>Situ</strong> <strong>Flushing</strong> Project Summaries<br />

GWRTAC Case Study Database<br />

GWRTAC ID: FLSH0030<br />

Project Name: Montana Pole & Treating, Butte, MT<br />

City: Butte State/Province: MT<br />

Primary GWRTAC Personal<br />

Communication Source<br />

(Name/Organization):<br />

Project Summary:<br />

Neil Marsh<br />

Montana DEQ<br />

<strong>Report</strong>(s)/Publication(s) (GWRTAC Source):<br />

U.S. EPA, Nov. 1996: <strong>In</strong>novative Treatment Technologies: Annual <strong>Status</strong> <strong>Report</strong> (Eighth Edition),<br />

EPA 542-R-96-010, Number 8, U.S. EPA OSWER (5102G) TIO, Washington, DC<br />

<strong>In</strong>ternet URL http://www.epa.gov.superfund.htm<br />

The following text is from notes from a July 1998 conversation with the Montana DEQ RPM:<br />

The site has 10-15 acres of pentachlorophenol (PCP)-contaminated area bisected by an interstate<br />

highway. The ROD calls for accessible soils to be excavated and treated aboveground via<br />

landfarming and aerated biopiles. To date, soil excavation has taken place on the north side of the<br />

interstate, and excavation on the south side of the interstate will begin in 1999.<br />

A total of about 200,000 cubic yards of contaminated soils will be excavated and treated ex situ.<br />

However, approximately 50,000 cubic yards of contaminated soil lies beneath the interstate<br />

highway, and will be remediated via in situ flushing, although ozone injection is also under<br />

consideration for these soils <strong>In</strong> situ flushing will also be used to remediate groundwater. Much<br />

LNAPL at the site (comprised of diesel fuel and 5% PCP), was removed at the time of soil<br />

excavation, however remaining LNAPL will also be targeted with in situ flushing. The remediation<br />

goals for PCP for the site are 34 ppm in soil and 1 ppb in groundwater.<br />

The geologic material of the subsurface area targeted for in situ flushing is comprised of sandy<br />

alluvial material. The water table is present at approximately 5 to 8 feet below the ground surface.<br />

At the time of soil excavation north of the interstate, the excavations were extended to about two<br />

feet below the water table. The excavations were backfilled with clean soil, and recharge basins<br />

were constructed to allow current recharge of treated groundwater for flushing. (<strong>In</strong> the future after<br />

soils treated aboveground are replaced, the current recharge basin system will be replaced with a<br />

subsurface manifold system to deliver the treated groundwater to the subsurface).<br />

Two interception trenches (approximately 30 feet deep) have been installed north of the interstate.<br />

The downgradient trench is designed to prevent contaminated groundwater from leaving the site.<br />

Approximately 150 gpm groundwater is extracted from this trench and treated via carbon<br />

absorption with discharge to surface water or recharge to groundwater through the<br />

aeration/infiltration basins. The upgradient trench is designed to intercept both contaminated<br />

groundwater and LNAPL before it reaches the north site excavated area. About 150 gpm<br />

groundwater is exrracted, treated, and discharged. LNAPL is intercepted by a physical plastic<br />

Ground-Water Remediation Technologies Analysis Center<br />

Operated by Concurrent Technologies Corporation<br />

Appendix - Page 65 of 164<br />

Copyright GWRTAC 1998<br />

Revision 1<br />

Tuesday, November 17, 1998

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!