13.08.2013 Views

Technology Status Report: In Situ Flushing - CLU-IN

Technology Status Report: In Situ Flushing - CLU-IN

Technology Status Report: In Situ Flushing - CLU-IN

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>In</strong> <strong>Situ</strong> <strong>Flushing</strong> Project Summaries<br />

GWRTAC Case Study Database<br />

GWRTAC ID: FLSH0031<br />

Project Name: Ninth Avenue Dump, Gary, <strong>IN</strong><br />

City: Gary State/Province: <strong>IN</strong><br />

Primary GWRTAC Personal<br />

Communication Source<br />

(Name/Organization):<br />

Project Summary:<br />

Bernie Schorle<br />

U.S. EPA<br />

<strong>Report</strong>(s)/Publication(s) (GWRTAC Source):<br />

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1991: Engineering Bulletin <strong>In</strong> <strong>Situ</strong> Soil <strong>Flushing</strong>,<br />

EPA/540/2-91/021, U.S. EPA Office of Emergency and Remedial Response (OERR), Washington,<br />

DC 20460, Office of Research and Development (ORD), Cincinnati, Ohio 45268, 8 pp., October<br />

1991.<br />

The following text is from notes from a July 1998 conversation with the EPA RPM:<br />

Groundwater was extracted about 10 to 15 feet below the water table. Extracted fluids were<br />

treated above ground (with oil/water separation for collection of LNAPL, physical/chemical<br />

treatment for iron precipitation, and a sequencing batch bioreactor). The treated groundwater reinjected<br />

through perforated pipes on top of the ground; the pipes were covered with soil. A slurry<br />

wall surrounds the site, and the flushing operation was conducted within the slurry wall. The slurry<br />

wall is keyed into a confining layer present at 28 to 30 feet below the ground surface. The NPDES<br />

permit allowed for discharge of surface water from on-site ponds, not treated groundwater. It is<br />

possible, however that groundwater may have entered ponds.<br />

Chemical oxygen demand (COD) was reduced by 10-20% and attributed to the flushing operation.<br />

<strong>Report</strong>(s)/Publication(s) (Additional <strong>In</strong>formation Sources):<br />

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1991: Engineering Bulletin <strong>In</strong> <strong>Situ</strong> Soil <strong>Flushing</strong>,<br />

EPA/540/2-91/021, U.S. EPA Office of Emergency and Remedial Response (OERR), Washington,<br />

DC 20460, Office of Research and Development (ORD), Cincinnati, Ohio 45268, 8 pp., October<br />

1991.<br />

Ground-Water Remediation Technologies Analysis Center<br />

Operated by Concurrent Technologies Corporation<br />

Appendix - Page 67 of 164<br />

Copyright GWRTAC 1998<br />

Revision 1<br />

Tuesday, November 17, 1998

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!