13.08.2013 Views

Technology Status Report: In Situ Flushing - CLU-IN

Technology Status Report: In Situ Flushing - CLU-IN

Technology Status Report: In Situ Flushing - CLU-IN

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>In</strong> <strong>Situ</strong> <strong>Flushing</strong> Project Summaries<br />

GWRTAC Case Study Database<br />

GWRTAC ID: FLSH0065<br />

Project Name: Pearl Harbor<br />

City: Pearl Harbor State/Province: HI<br />

Primary GWRTAC Personal<br />

Communication Source<br />

(Name/Organization):<br />

Project Summary:<br />

John Londergan<br />

Duke Engineering & Services<br />

<strong>Report</strong>(s)/Publication(s) (GWRTAC Source):<br />

None<br />

The following text was provided in a project summary on September 8, 1998 by Duke Engineering<br />

& Services of Austin, TX:<br />

Pearl Harbor Naval station is contaminated with petroleum hydrocarbons that are present in the<br />

subsurface as light non-aqueous phase liquids (LNAPL). <strong>In</strong> particular, petroleum hydrocarbons are<br />

seeping into Pearl Harbor at Quarry Loch. To address this problem, the Navy has funded a project<br />

intended to demonstrate the effectiveness of various remediation technologies. A demonstration<br />

area adjacent to Quarry Loch has been dedicated for this project. The LNAPL contaminant at the<br />

site is mainly Navy Special Fuel Oil (NFSO), a highly viscous fuel oil. Duke Engineering and<br />

Services (DE&S) will demonstrate the use of Surfactant Enhanced Aquifer Remediation (SEAR) to<br />

remove the LNAPL contamination.<br />

<strong>In</strong> early December, 1997 DE&S began a hydrogeologic characterization of the Quarry Loch vicinity<br />

in search of a suitable area for the demonstration. The characterization concluded in January,<br />

1998 with the installation of the demonstration well array and aquifer testing. <strong>In</strong>formation obtained<br />

during this investigation was used to build a geosystem model. The numerical code used for the<br />

model is UTCHEM, a multi-phase, multi-dimensional chemical compositional simulator developed<br />

at the University of Texas at Austin.<br />

A major challenge of this project has been to develop a surfactant that is capable of effectively<br />

solubilizing the NSFO. The NSFO in the demonstration area is highly viscous (2,000 to 3,000 cp)<br />

and is not readily solubilized by commercially available surfactants. Laboratory work conducted on<br />

solubilizing the recalcitrant NAPL at Pearl Harbor eventually led to the development of a new<br />

surfactant and includes the additional requirement that the subsurface be heated to approximately<br />

50°C to achieve satisfactory remediation performance.<br />

To accurately assess the efficiency of the SEAR demonstration, two partitioning interwell tracer<br />

tests (PITTs) will be conducted at the SEAR site. The first PITT will be performed to accurately<br />

measure the volume of NAPL present in the test zone before the surfactant flood. The SEAR will<br />

be immediately followed by a second PITT to measure the volume of DNAPL remaining in the test<br />

zone. PITT 1 and PITT 2 will be compared to evaluate the effectiveness (i.e. performance<br />

assessment) of the surfactant flood to remove DNAPL from the test zone. Laboratory studies have<br />

been completed to select a suite of conservative (non-partitioning) and partitioning tracers for the<br />

Ground-Water Remediation Technologies Analysis Center<br />

Operated by Concurrent Technologies Corporation<br />

Appendix - Page 131 of 164<br />

Copyright GWRTAC 1998<br />

Revision 1<br />

Tuesday, November 17, 1998

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!