Technology Status Report: In Situ Flushing - CLU-IN

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Table 4 In Situ Flushing - Recovered Contaminant Mass / Economic Information Available Total Number of Case Studies = 84 GWRTAC Project Reported Contaminant Reported Fraction of Economic Scale of ID Name Mass Recovered Inital Mass Recovered Information Project FLSH0038 Sindelfingen, Germany Within 18 Months After TCE Spill, 17 Metric Tons of Chlorinated Hydrocarbons were Recovered FLSH0074 SW Tank Farm, Tinker Air Force Base, OK FLSH0041 Texas Eastern Transmission Facility, Delmont, PA FLSH0042 Thouin Sand Quarry, Quebec, CA FLSH0053 U.S. Air Force Plant 4, Fort Worth, TX Initial Mass Estimates not Available from Source Full- Scale/Commercial Pilot/Field Demonstration 0.32 Kg PCBs Unknown At present, no plans exist for further Pilot/Field surfactant flushing at the site. Instead, recovery and treatment of PCBs at the spring is planned. The limiting factor controlling the duration of the surfactant injections presented above was the ability to effect Demonstration 992 Kg DNAPL 86% Residual DNAPL Pilot/Field Demonstration Project is in Progress; Surfactants may or may not be Applicable FLSH0051 U.S. Coast Guard, Traverse City, 3.354 gm PCE Total, 2.757 gm PCE Through MI Surfactant-Enhanced Solubilization FLSH0054 U.S. DOE Gaseous Diffusion Plnt, Paducah, KY FLSH0075 U.S. DOE Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plant FLSH0008 U.S. DOE Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Site, Piketon, OH FLSH0043 Umatilla Army Depot (Lagoons), Hermiston, OR FLSH0044 United Chrome Products, Corvallis, OR FLSH0083 University of Arizona - HC Solubilzation and Mobilization by Biosurfactant FLSH0082 University of Florida - Two- Dimensional Flow Experiments and Simulations FLSH0081 University of Illinois - Impact of Surfactant of Configuration of HC Lens No Increase in TCE Concentration was Achieved 20 to 40 L (Approximately 5.to 10 Gallons) DNAPL Project is in Progress; Surfactants may or may not be Applicable Pilot/Field Demonstration Intial Mass not Known Pilot/Field Demonstration No Increase in TCE Concentration was Achieved Pilot/Field Demonstration Laboratory/Bench Scale Approximately 50% of Original DNAPL No estimated full-scale cost was available. Pilot/Field Demonstration Project is in Progress Project is in Progress Full- Scale/Commercial Project is in Progress; Over 3 Years, 9.7 MM Gallons of Impacted Groundwater Containing 26,732 lbs. of Cr+6 have been Removed Project is in Progress Cost estimates indicate that treatment costs Pilot/Field were estimated at $40/lb of Cr+6 removed for Demonstration the first 25,000 lbs. As Cr+6 concentrations drop in later phases of operation, it is estimated that costs will double to $80/lb of Cr+6 removed. 58% of Residual NAPL (Hexadecane) Removed Within Three Pore Volumes From Laboratory Sand Columns Laboratory/Bench Scale Laboratory/Bench Scale Laboratory/Bench Scale FLSH0052 University of Michigan Project is in Progress Project is in Progress Laboratory/Bench Scale Ground-Water Remediation Technologies Analysis Center Operated by CTC 1-800-373-1973 Page 24 GWRTAC 1998 As of 11/17/98
Table 4 In Situ Flushing - Recovered Contaminant Mass / Economic Information Available Total Number of Case Studies = 84 GWRTAC Project Reported Contaminant Reported Fraction of Economic Scale of ID Name Mass Recovered Inital Mass Recovered Information Project FLSH0045 University of Michigan - Project is in Progress Project is in Progress Laboratory/Bench Surfactant Remediation of NAPL- Contaminated Aquifers Scale FLSH0079 University of North Carolina - Bank Formation in Surfactant Remediation of DNAPL FLSH0080 University of Oklahoma - Remediation of Chlorinated Solvents Using Edible Surfactancts Laboratory/Bench Scale Laboratory/Bench Scale FLSH0076 UST Site, Shawnee, OK Pilot/Field Demonstration FLSH0048 Vineland Chemical, Vineland, NJ Project not yet Begun Project not yet Begun Full- Scale/Commercial FLSH0049 Volk Air National Guard Base, WI Ground-Water Remediation Technologies Analysis Center Operated by CTC 1-800-373-1973 Page 25 Pilot/Field Demonstration GWRTAC 1998 As of 11/17/98
Page 1 and 2: Technology Status Report Technology
Page 3 and 4: ABSTRACT This technology status rep
Page 5 and 6: LIST OF TABLES Table Title Page 1 I
Page 7 and 8: 1.0 INTRODUCTION / PURPOSE OF STATU
Page 9 and 10: a laboratory-scale project. As illu
Page 11 and 12: 3.1 Flushing Solutions 3.0 ANALYSIS
Page 13 and 14: (approximately eight) full-scale pr
Page 15 and 16: Table 1. In Situ Flushing - Summary
Page 21 and 22: Table 3 In Situ Flushing - Geology
Page 27 and 28: Table 4 In Situ Flushing - Recovere
Page 29: Table 4 In Situ Flushing - Recovere
Page 33 and 34: Full-Scale/Commercial 26% Figure 2.
Page 35 and 36: Site Remediation 25% Figure 4. In S
Page 37 and 38: NAPL Removal 34% Figure 6. In Situ
Page 39 and 40: Figure 8. In Situ Flushing - Distri
Page 41 and 42: Number of Projects 35 30 25 20 15 1
Page 43 and 44: Number of Case Studies 45 40 35 30
Page 45 and 46: 25 ft and 50 ft and 10 ft and 100 f
Page 47 and 48: Unconfined Aquifer 65% Figure 16. I
Page 49 and 50: In Situ Flushing Project Summaries
Page 81 and 82:
In Situ Flushing Project Summaries
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
Page 131 and 132:
Page 133 and 134:
Page 135 and 136:
Page 137 and 138:
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
Page 147 and 148:
Page 149 and 150:
Page 151 and 152:
Page 153 and 154:
Page 155 and 156:
Page 157 and 158:
Page 159 and 160:
Page 161 and 162:
Page 163 and 164:
Page 165 and 166:
Page 167 and 168:
Page 169 and 170:
Page 171 and 172:
Page 173 and 174:
Page 175 and 176:
Page 177 and 178:
Page 179 and 180:
Page 181 and 182:
Page 183 and 184:
Page 185 and 186:
Page 187 and 188:
Page 189 and 190:
Page 191 and 192:
Page 193 and 194:
Page 195 and 196:
Page 197 and 198:
Page 199 and 200:
Page 201 and 202:
Page 203 and 204:
Page 205 and 206:
Page 207 and 208:
Page 209 and 210:
Page 211 and 212:
show all

Technology Status Report: In Situ Flushing - CLU-IN

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?