Technology Status Report: In Situ Flushing - CLU-IN
Technology Status Report: In Situ Flushing - CLU-IN
Technology Status Report: In Situ Flushing - CLU-IN
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>In</strong> <strong>Situ</strong> <strong>Flushing</strong> Project Summaries<br />
GWRTAC Case Study Database<br />
GWRTAC ID: FLSH0076<br />
Project Name: UST Site, Shawnee, OK<br />
City: Shawnee State/Province: OK<br />
Primary GWRTAC Personal<br />
Communication Source<br />
(Name/Organization):<br />
Project Summary:<br />
Mark Hasegawa<br />
<strong>Report</strong>(s)/Publication(s) (GWRTAC Source):<br />
None<br />
Surbec Environmental Services<br />
The following text was excerpted from marketing information provided by Surbec Environmental,<br />
Norman, Oklahoma, in October 1998:<br />
Surface remediation can be a cost effective method for removal of residual subsurface petroleum<br />
hydrocarbons. When used in conjunction with Risk Based Corrective Action (RBCA) this<br />
technology can be used to remediate to Site Specific Target Levels (SSTLs). <strong>In</strong> order to quantify<br />
the potential cost of this application, a pilot test is being conducted in Shawnee, Oklahoma.<br />
Results of the flush will be used for future design and cost analysis purposes.<br />
Predesign analysis, Modflow analysis, tracer test analysis, surfactant selection and optimization,<br />
surfactant recovery design, fate transport analysis, and process design were conducted by Surbec.<br />
A treatability study was conducted to evaluate surfactant-enhanced recovery of BTEX and TPH.<br />
This study focused on separating the contaminant from the waste stream and Micellar Enhanced<br />
Ultrafiltration (MEUF) for surfactant reconcentration. Numerical 3-D flow and 2-D fate and<br />
transport modeling to identify injection/capture zones was also conducted.<br />
Surfactant injection/recovery project included re-injection of treated surfactant. Demonstrated 92%<br />
recovery of injected surfactant. A surfactant-contaminant separation process and surfactant reconcentration<br />
system (MEUF) was designed and implemented. The effective application of foam<br />
fractionation for tertiary surfactant recovery was demonstrated.<br />
<strong>Report</strong>(s)/Publication(s) (Additional <strong>In</strong>formation Sources):<br />
Ground-Water Remediation Technologies Analysis Center<br />
Operated by Concurrent Technologies Corporation<br />
Appendix - Page 152 of 164<br />
Copyright GWRTAC 1998<br />
Revision 1<br />
Tuesday, November 17, 1998