Technology Status Report: In Situ Flushing - CLU-IN
Technology Status Report: In Situ Flushing - CLU-IN
Technology Status Report: In Situ Flushing - CLU-IN
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>In</strong> <strong>Situ</strong> <strong>Flushing</strong> Project Summaries<br />
GWRTAC Case Study Database<br />
nonyI-phenol ethoxylate, and I percent phosphate ester of nonylphenoI ethoxylate was pumped<br />
through the 3-meter-thick contaminated section of the cell to evaluate surfactant-enhanced<br />
remediation."<br />
"The surfactant was injected in five wells on one side of the cell and extracted from five wells on<br />
the other side. The wells were screened over the entire contaminated zone, which was kept<br />
saturated throughout the experiment. The concentration of tetrachloroethylene (PCE) in the<br />
effluent increased from its aqueous solubility of about 150 parts per million (ppm) to over 4,000<br />
ppm when the surfactant was added. The increase in concentration illustrates the efficiency of the<br />
surfactant process. The surfactant solution used provides a solubility of PCE of about 12,000 ppm;<br />
values in excess of 11,500 ppm were observed in several sampling points on the five multilevel<br />
monitoring wells in the cell. This illustrates that the surfactants provided the same soIubilization<br />
power in the field as predicted in the laboratory."<br />
"The system performed as expected, solubilization was high, surfactant breakthrough was<br />
indistinguishable from that of a conservative tracer indicating sorption was veny low (the aquifer<br />
has no significant clay or organic content) and the air stripper separation was effective. Several<br />
modifications had to be made to the air stripper, however, to prevent foaming; very low air<br />
velocities were eventually employed."<br />
The DNAPL concentration was rapidly reduced in the cell in areas of high hydraulic conductivity.<br />
The residual PCE in the top 1 m was reduced from an initial value of 10% to a value of 1% after<br />
14.4 PVs. At a depth of 2.5 to 3 m, where the ground was either saturated or at 20% saturation<br />
with PCE initially, the PCE saturation was reduced to 3% after 14.4 PVs. Approximately 80% of<br />
the total material was recovered, with the remaining material lost to volatilization or remaining in<br />
dead zones within the formation. The surfactant solution was initially injected into the wells with a<br />
constant-head system on each well; this later was changed to peristaltic pumps due to plugging of<br />
the injection wells.<br />
"The concentration of PCE in the multilevels dropped to a few ppm within 14 pore volumes, except<br />
for the multilevel ports right on the aquitard. These data indicated that the DNAPL had been<br />
removed over nearly the entire aquifer. This was confirmed by analysis of cores taken prior to the<br />
start of the experiment, after seven pore volumes had been circulated, and after 14 pore volumes<br />
had been circulated. These analyses showed that:<br />
I. Nearly all the PCE was removed by 14 pore volumes.<br />
2.The layers of high PCE concentration, which represent perched lenses of PCE, remained at the<br />
same height throughout the experiment indicating the lenses did not drop due to vertical<br />
mobiIization.<br />
3.The persistence of PCE along the aquitard indicates that complete removal would require an<br />
extended treatment time.<br />
After having circulated almost 20 pore volumes of solution, and elevated concentrations of PCE<br />
still occurred in the multilevel at the top of the aquitard.<br />
The base of the aquifer has slightly dipping layers of sand and silt. The PCE is apparently<br />
Ground-Water Remediation Technologies Analysis Center<br />
Operated by Concurrent Technologies Corporation<br />
Appendix - Page 5 of 164<br />
Copyright GWRTAC 1998<br />
Revision 1<br />
Tuesday, November 17, 1998