13.08.2013 Views

Technology Status Report: In Situ Flushing - CLU-IN

Technology Status Report: In Situ Flushing - CLU-IN

Technology Status Report: In Situ Flushing - CLU-IN

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>In</strong> <strong>Situ</strong> <strong>Flushing</strong> Project Summaries<br />

GWRTAC Case Study Database<br />

nonyI-phenol ethoxylate, and I percent phosphate ester of nonylphenoI ethoxylate was pumped<br />

through the 3-meter-thick contaminated section of the cell to evaluate surfactant-enhanced<br />

remediation."<br />

"The surfactant was injected in five wells on one side of the cell and extracted from five wells on<br />

the other side. The wells were screened over the entire contaminated zone, which was kept<br />

saturated throughout the experiment. The concentration of tetrachloroethylene (PCE) in the<br />

effluent increased from its aqueous solubility of about 150 parts per million (ppm) to over 4,000<br />

ppm when the surfactant was added. The increase in concentration illustrates the efficiency of the<br />

surfactant process. The surfactant solution used provides a solubility of PCE of about 12,000 ppm;<br />

values in excess of 11,500 ppm were observed in several sampling points on the five multilevel<br />

monitoring wells in the cell. This illustrates that the surfactants provided the same soIubilization<br />

power in the field as predicted in the laboratory."<br />

"The system performed as expected, solubilization was high, surfactant breakthrough was<br />

indistinguishable from that of a conservative tracer indicating sorption was veny low (the aquifer<br />

has no significant clay or organic content) and the air stripper separation was effective. Several<br />

modifications had to be made to the air stripper, however, to prevent foaming; very low air<br />

velocities were eventually employed."<br />

The DNAPL concentration was rapidly reduced in the cell in areas of high hydraulic conductivity.<br />

The residual PCE in the top 1 m was reduced from an initial value of 10% to a value of 1% after<br />

14.4 PVs. At a depth of 2.5 to 3 m, where the ground was either saturated or at 20% saturation<br />

with PCE initially, the PCE saturation was reduced to 3% after 14.4 PVs. Approximately 80% of<br />

the total material was recovered, with the remaining material lost to volatilization or remaining in<br />

dead zones within the formation. The surfactant solution was initially injected into the wells with a<br />

constant-head system on each well; this later was changed to peristaltic pumps due to plugging of<br />

the injection wells.<br />

"The concentration of PCE in the multilevels dropped to a few ppm within 14 pore volumes, except<br />

for the multilevel ports right on the aquitard. These data indicated that the DNAPL had been<br />

removed over nearly the entire aquifer. This was confirmed by analysis of cores taken prior to the<br />

start of the experiment, after seven pore volumes had been circulated, and after 14 pore volumes<br />

had been circulated. These analyses showed that:<br />

I. Nearly all the PCE was removed by 14 pore volumes.<br />

2.The layers of high PCE concentration, which represent perched lenses of PCE, remained at the<br />

same height throughout the experiment indicating the lenses did not drop due to vertical<br />

mobiIization.<br />

3.The persistence of PCE along the aquitard indicates that complete removal would require an<br />

extended treatment time.<br />

After having circulated almost 20 pore volumes of solution, and elevated concentrations of PCE<br />

still occurred in the multilevel at the top of the aquitard.<br />

The base of the aquifer has slightly dipping layers of sand and silt. The PCE is apparently<br />

Ground-Water Remediation Technologies Analysis Center<br />

Operated by Concurrent Technologies Corporation<br />

Appendix - Page 5 of 164<br />

Copyright GWRTAC 1998<br />

Revision 1<br />

Tuesday, November 17, 1998

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!