Technology Status Report: In Situ Flushing - CLU-IN

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Table 3 In Situ Flushing - Geology of Treatment Zone / Size of Contaminated Zone or Test Area Size (Pilot/Field Demos and Full-Scale/Commercial Projects Only; this Table Excludes Lab/Bench-Scale Projects) Total Number of Case Studies = 64 Maximum Areal Pore Volume Volume of Extent of Main Contained in GWRTAC Project Geology of Main Target Geology of Target Treatment Contaminated Ground-water Main Ground-water Scale of ID Name Treatment Zone Zone Clarification Soil (Vadose Zone) Contaminant Plume Contaminant Plume Project FLSH0009 Dover AFB, Dover, DE (Test Unconsol. Seds. - Poorly Sorted Lynch Heights and Columbia Fms. Pilot/Field Cell 3, Cosolvent Solubilization) Predom. Coarse Grained unconfined aquifer - silty, poorly sorted sands, potential for discontinuous clay lenses and gravely sand lenses Demonstration FLSH0010 Eckenfelder, Inc. - Surfactant Recycling Unspecified Lab study - soil test bed Pilot/Field Demonstration FLSH0073 Envirogen - Effects of Emulsion Unspecified NA (Lab Study) Laboratory/Bench Viscosity Scale FLSH0072 Envirogen - Surfactant Foam/Bioaugmentation FLSH0011 Estrie Region Machine Shop, Quebec, CA FLSH0021 Former Dry Cleaning Facilty, Jacksonville, FL FLSH0059 Fredricksburg, VA Wood Treating SIte FLSH0012 General Motors NAO Research & Development Center, Warren, MI FLSH0084 Georessources - Aquifer Washing by Micellar Solutions Unspecified NA (Lab Study) Laboratory/Bench Scale Unconsol. Seds. - Predom. Well Sorted Sand/Gravel St. Lawrence Lowlands - Fine sand with 1,800 m3 (about 63,575 ft2) Full- 10-12% silt Scale/Commercial Unconsol. Seds. - Predom. Well Sorted Sandy alluvium Pilot/Field Sand/Gravel Demonstration Unconsol. Seds. - Poorly Sorted Predom. Fine-Grained Unconsol. Seds. - Interbedded Sediments Clay-silt alluvium, cresote perched on clay lenses Central Glaciated Plains - 10 to 13 feet of sandy fill overlying fine-grained alluvial and sandy glacial outwash 10 foot diameter x 5 foot deep test plot Pilot/Field Demonstration Pilot/Field Demonstration Unspecified NA (Lab Study) Laboratory/Bench Scale FLSH0013 GHEA Associates, New Jersey Unconsol. Seds. - Predom. Clay/Silt Clayey soils Pilot/Field Operating Facilty of Major U.S. Corporation Demonstration FLSH0014 Goose Farm, Plumsted Twp, NJ Unconsol. Seds. - Poorly Sorted Predom. Coarse Grained FLSH0050 Gulf Power - Lynn Haven, FL Unconsol. Seds. - Poorly Sorted Predom. Coarse Grained Coastal Plain - Kirkwood Aquifer Full- Scale/Commercial Coastal Plain - The Surfical Aquifer (silty fine sand) FLSH0058 Hialeah County, FL Bedrock - Carbonate - Karst SE Coastal Plain Cly org rich sand over solution cavity limestone FLSH0056 Hill Air Force Base (Cell 4, OU 1 - Cyclodextrin Solubilization) FLSH0055 Hill Air Force Base (OU 2 - Foam Flood) FLSH0057 Hill Air Force Base (OU2 1/5 Full Scale Surfactant Flood) FLSH0015 Hill Air Force Base, UT (Cell 3, OU1 - Cosolvent Mobilization) FLSH0016 Hill Air Force Base, UT (Cell 5, OU1 - Surfactant Mobilization) Unconsol. Seds. - Poorly Sorted Predom. Coarse Grained Unconsol. Seds. - Poorly Sorted Predom. Coarse Grained Unconsol. Seds. - Poorly Sorted Predom. Coarse Grained Unconsol. Seds. - Poorly Sorted Predom. Coarse Grained Unconsol. Seds. - Poorly Sorted Predom. Coarse Grained FLSH0017 Hill Air Force Base, UT (Cell 6, Unconsol. Seds. - Poorly Sorted OU1 - Surfactant Solubilization) Predom. Coarse Grained Ground-Water Remediation Technologies Analysis Center Operated by CTC 1-800-373-1973 Great Basin - Poorly sorted alluvial sand and gravel underlain by lacustrian clay Great Basin - Poorly sorted alluvial sand and gravel underlain by lacustrian clay Great Basin - Poorly sorted alluvial sand and gravel underlain by lacustrian clay Great Basin- Poorly sorted alluvial sand and gravel underlain by lacustrian clay Great Basin - Poorly sorted alluvial sand and gravel underlain by lacustrian clay Great Basin - Poorly sorted alluvial sand and gravel underlain by lacustrian clay Page 16 Full- Scale/Commercial Pilot/Field Demonstration 3 x 5 m (9.8 x 16.4 ft) or 1,000 to 2,500 gallons Pilot/Field about 160 ft2 test cell Demonstration 3 x 5 m (9.8 x 16.4 ft or about 160 ft2) test cell 3 x 5 m (9.8 x 16.4 ft or about 160 ft2) test cell 3 x 5 m (9.8 x 16.4 ft or about 160 ft2) test cell Pilot/Field Demonstration Full- Scale/Commercial 1,500 gallons Pilot/Field Demonstration 1,500 to 2,500 gallons Pilot/Field Demonstration Pilot/Field Demonstration GWRTAC 1998 As of 11/17/98
Table 3 In Situ Flushing - Geology of Treatment Zone / Size of Contaminated Zone or Test Area Size (Pilot/Field Demos and Full-Scale/Commercial Projects Only; this Table Excludes Lab/Bench-Scale Projects) Total Number of Case Studies = 64 Maximum Areal Pore Volume Volume of Extent of Main Contained in GWRTAC Project Geology of Main Target Geology of Target Treatment Contaminated Ground-water Main Ground-water Scale of ID Name Treatment Zone Zone Clarification Soil (Vadose Zone) Contaminant Plume Contaminant Plume Project FLSH0018 Hill Air Force Base, UT (Cell 8, OU1 - Surfactant/Cosolvent Solubilization) FLSH0019 Hill Air Force Base, UT (OU2 - Micellar Flood) Unconsol. Seds. - Poorly Sorted Predom. Coarse Grained Unconsol. Seds. - Poorly Sorted Predom. Coarse Grained FLSH0022 Hill Air Force Base, UT (Test1, Unconsol. Seds. - Poorly Sorted OU1 - Cosolvent Solubilization) Predom. Coarse Grained FLSH0023 Hooker Chemical/Ruco Polymer, NY Great Basin - Poorly sorted alluvial sand and gravel underlain by lacustrian clay Great Basin - Poorly sorted alluvial sand and gravel underlain by lacustrian clay Great Basin - Poorly sorted alluvial sand and gravel underlain by lacustrian clay 3 x 5 m (9.8 x 16.4 ft or about 160 ft2) test cell 1,000 to 2,500 gallons Pilot/Field Demonstration 6 x 9 m (19.7 x 29.5 ft or 15,000 gallons Pilot/Field about 580 ft2) test area Demonstration 3 x 5 m (9.8 x 16.4 ft or about 160 ft2) test cell 4,000 L (about 1,057 gal) Pilot/Field Demonstration Unconsol. Seds. - Predom. Well Sorted Upper Glacial Formation Full- Sand/Gravel Scale/Commercial FLSH0024 Howard University, Unspecified Lab study Laboratory/Bench Washington, DC - Treatment of PCBs with Surfactants Scale FLSH0025 JADCO-Hughes, Belmont, NC Unspecified Pilot/Field Demonstration FLSH0001 Koppers Co. Inc., Seaboard Plant, Kearny, NJ FLSH0026 Laramie, WY, Private wood treating site Unconsol. Seds. - Poorly Sorted Predom. Coarse Grained Unconsol. Seds. - Poorly Sorted Predom. Coarse Grained Fill unit Pilot/Field Demonstration Graduated from fine sands, silts and clays at surface to coarse sands and fine gravels at base FLSH0027 Lee Chemical, Liberty, MO Unconsol. Seds. - Predom. Well Sorted Missouri River bottom alluvial Sand/Gravel sediments >500,000 yd3 total (27 x 27 ft (27 x 27 ft (729 ft2) test 5,000 gallons within 27 test cell and 130 x 130 ft test cell and 130 x 130 ft x 27 ft test cell cell) (16,900 ft2) test cell) Pilot/Field Demonstration Full- Scale/Commercial FLSH0028 Lipari Landfill, Pitman, NJ Unspecified Cohansey Aquifer Full- Scale/Commercial FLSH0071 Louisiana State University - Colloidal Gas Aphron from Naturally-Derived Surfactant FLSH0029 Michigan State University - Surfactant Research and Soils Modification with Surfactants FLSH0030 Montana Pole & Treating, Butte, MT Unspecified NA (Lab Study) Laboratory/Bench Scale Unspecified Lab studies Laboratory/Bench Scale Unconsol. Seds. - Predom. Well Sorted Sand/Gravel Sandy alluvial material 200,000 yd3 total site (50,000 to 60,000 yd3 may be remediated via in situ flushing) Full- Scale/Commercial FLSH0070 National Tsing Hua University - Unspecified NA (Lab Study) Laboratory/Bench Effects of Surfactants of Sorption/Micellar Solubilization Scale FLSH0060 National Water Res Inst, Env Canada - Humic Acid Flushing FLSH0031 Ninth Avenue Dump, Gary, IN Unconsol. Seds. - Poorly Sorted Predom. Coarse Grained Ground-Water Remediation Technologies Analysis Center Operated by CTC 1-800-373-1973 Unspecified Medium to coarse-grained sand Laboratory/Bench Scale Sand/waste (Mostly sand but mixed with debris (timbers, etc.). Originally was wetland (Dune and Swale) formation particular to northern Indiana Page 17 Full- Scale/Commercial GWRTAC 1998 As of 11/17/98
Page 1 and 2: Technology Status Report Technology
Page 3 and 4: ABSTRACT This technology status rep
Page 5 and 6: LIST OF TABLES Table Title Page 1 I
Page 7 and 8: 1.0 INTRODUCTION / PURPOSE OF STATU
Page 9 and 10: a laboratory-scale project. As illu
Page 11 and 12: 3.1 Flushing Solutions 3.0 ANALYSIS
Page 13 and 14: (approximately eight) full-scale pr
Page 15 and 16: Table 1. In Situ Flushing - Summary
Page 21: Table 3 In Situ Flushing - Geology
Page 25 and 26: Table 3 In Situ Flushing - Geology
Page 27 and 28: Table 4 In Situ Flushing - Recovere
Page 33 and 34: Full-Scale/Commercial 26% Figure 2.
Page 35 and 36: Site Remediation 25% Figure 4. In S
Page 37 and 38: NAPL Removal 34% Figure 6. In Situ
Page 39 and 40: Figure 8. In Situ Flushing - Distri
Page 41 and 42: Number of Projects 35 30 25 20 15 1
Page 43 and 44: Number of Case Studies 45 40 35 30
Page 45 and 46: 25 ft and 50 ft and 10 ft and 100 f
Page 47 and 48: Unconfined Aquifer 65% Figure 16. I
Page 49 and 50: In Situ Flushing Project Summaries
Page 73 and 74:
In Situ Flushing Project Summaries
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
Page 79 and 80:
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
Page 131 and 132:
Page 133 and 134:
Page 135 and 136:
Page 137 and 138:
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
Page 147 and 148:
Page 149 and 150:
Page 151 and 152:
Page 153 and 154:
Page 155 and 156:
Page 157 and 158:
Page 159 and 160:
Page 161 and 162:
Page 163 and 164:
Page 165 and 166:
Page 167 and 168:
Page 169 and 170:
Page 171 and 172:
Page 173 and 174:
Page 175 and 176:
Page 177 and 178:
Page 179 and 180:
Page 181 and 182:
Page 183 and 184:
Page 185 and 186:
Page 187 and 188:
Page 189 and 190:
Page 191 and 192:
Page 193 and 194:
Page 195 and 196:
Page 197 and 198:
Page 199 and 200:
Page 201 and 202:
Page 203 and 204:
Page 205 and 206:
Page 207 and 208:
Page 209 and 210:
Page 211 and 212:
show all

Technology Status Report: In Situ Flushing - CLU-IN

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?