13.08.2013 Views

Technology Status Report: In Situ Flushing - CLU-IN

Technology Status Report: In Situ Flushing - CLU-IN

Technology Status Report: In Situ Flushing - CLU-IN

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>In</strong> <strong>Situ</strong> <strong>Flushing</strong> Project Summaries<br />

GWRTAC Case Study Database<br />

contaminants and assessing contaminant biodegradation and toxicity. Soil biotreatability was also<br />

verified and validated. The goal of the on-site demonstration was to evaluate the effects of<br />

surfactants and washing on biological activity, to assess and optimize the well points in controlling<br />

the treatment, and to assess the effect of nutrients and other environmental factors on biological<br />

activity.<br />

Laboratory Results<br />

Using an experimental computer-designed multifactorial plan, the lab studies optimized the<br />

selection of surfactants as a function of the percentage of hydrocarbons extracted. The results<br />

were used to formulate a mixture of surfactanats with no mutagenic effect on E. Coli. Also, the soil<br />

contains a microbial flora that is able to biodegrade contaminants marked with heterotrophic cell<br />

counts on the order of 106 bacteria/gm. Of this number, about 6% of the microorganisms are<br />

BTEX degraders. Respiratory activity in the soil indicates that it is biologically very active. Onecolumn<br />

soil assays identified a condition conducive to a significant 25% reduction in MOG over a<br />

30-day period.<br />

Washing Test Results<br />

Varying conditions of soil saturation were experimented. The distribution of solutions thorugh the<br />

network of well points, with no surface infiltration, provided better hydraulic control of the injected<br />

solutions. Low surfactant concentrations were nonetheless measured outside the site and in the<br />

rock below the experimental plot of land. <strong>In</strong> a general sense, surfactant showed low efficiency in<br />

extracting hydrocarbons. It appears that the complexity of the geological conditions of the site<br />

influenced these results. Washing with surfactants had little or no effect on either the toxicity of the<br />

soil or groundwater. Moreover, following the washing, mean concentrations of heterotrophic and<br />

specific bacteria were equivalent to those obtained prior to washing, except in groundwater, where<br />

a sproradic increase was noted. Lastly, a reduction or absence of effect on respiration and on<br />

hexadecane mineralization was observed.<br />

Tracer Test Results<br />

A tracer test was done after the washing tests, but before the biological phase, so as to ensure that<br />

the injected solutions were distributed throughout the lot. Horizontal and vertical distribution were<br />

shown to be almost total. Only one characterized zone, possibly containing silt heterogeneities,<br />

was not reached. The vertical migration of the injected solution was generally limited to the<br />

experimental lot. Low concentrations were measured in rock.<br />

Biodegradation Test Results<br />

Oxygen consumption, measured by an in situ respirometric test, varied from 0.1% per hour to 5.1%<br />

per hour. Using a kinetic rate of zero, an estimate of the hydrocarbon degradation rate was<br />

obtained, which, at best, was 137 mg/kg-j. Analysis of gaseous oxygen in the soil pointed out the<br />

unequal distribution of oxygen during aeration: certain zones, possibly containing silt<br />

heterogeneities, remained anaerobic. The vertical and horizontal migration of nutrients is not<br />

limited to the experimental plot of land. Concentrations of NO3- and NH4+ were measured in<br />

unsolidated deposits and in rock off the site.<br />

Ground-Water Remediation Technologies Analysis Center<br />

Operated by Concurrent Technologies Corporation<br />

Appendix - Page 76 of 164<br />

Copyright GWRTAC 1998<br />

Revision 1<br />

Tuesday, November 17, 1998

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!