Technology Status Report: In Situ Flushing - CLU-IN

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Table 2. In Situ Flushing - Distribution of Case Studies by U.S. State, Canadian Province or Country (Pilot/Field and Full Scale/Commercial Projects Only; This Table Excludes Laboratory/Bench-Scale Projects) Total Number of Case Studies = 64 U.S. State, Canadian Province or Country Number of Studies Utah 9 New Jersey 7 Florida 6 Quebec 6 Delaware 5 Michigan 3 Ohio 3 North Carolina 2 Oklahoma 2 Oregon 2 Texas 2 Germany 1 Hawaii 1 Illinois 1 Indiana 1 Kentucky 1 Louisiana 1 Missouri 1 Montana 1 New Hampshire 1 NewYork 1 Ontario 1 Pennsylvania 1 Tennessee 1 Virginia 1 Wisconsin 1 Wyoming 1 Ground-Water Remediation Technologies Analysis Center Operated by CTC (800) 373-1973 Page 14 GWRTAC 1998 As of 11/17/98
Table 3 In Situ Flushing - Geology of Treatment Zone / Size of Contaminated Zone or Test Area Size (Pilot/Field Demos and Full-Scale/Commercial Projects Only; this Table Excludes Lab/Bench-Scale Projects) Total Number of Case Studies = 64 Maximum Areal Pore Volume Volume of Extent of Main Contained in GWRTAC Project Geology of Main Target Geology of Target Treatment Contaminated Ground-water Main Ground-water Scale of ID Name Treatment Zone Zone Clarification Soil (Vadose Zone) Contaminant Plume Contaminant Plume Project FLSH0066 Aluminum Company Site Unconsol. Seds. - Poorly Sorted Predom. Fine-Grained FLSH0002 Bog Creek Farm, Howell Township, NJ Heterogeneous, silty backfill 1,000 m3 (about 1,300 yd3) Full- Scale/Commercial Unspecified Full- Scale/Commercial FLSH0039 Camp Lejeune Unconsol. Seds. - Predom. Well Sorted Fine to very fine sand underlain by clay Sand/Gravel aquitard FLSH0003 Canadian AFB Borden, Alliston, Unconsol. Seds. - Predom. Well Sorted Unconsolidated sand aquifer, St. Ontario, Canada Sand/Gravel Lawrence Lowlands - beach sand deposit underlain by glacial till FLSH0047 Cape Canaveral Lodge Complex 34 Unconsol. Seds. - Poorly Sorted Predom. Coarse Grained FLSH0004 Chem-Dyne, Hamilton, OH Unconsol. Seds. - Poorly Sorted Predom. Coarse Grained FLSH0077 Coast Guard Facility, Elizabeth City, NC FLSH0020 Confidential Unconsol. Seds. - Poorly Sorted Predom. Coarse Grained FLSH0005 Cornell University - Surfactant Enhance Biodegradation FLSH0006 Corpus Christi Dupont, Corpus Christi, TX FLSH0007 Cross Brothers Pail, Pembroke, IL FLSH0062 Dover AFB, Dover, DE (Cosolvent Mobilization) 9.8 x 9.8 foot (96 ft2) test cell 4,800 gallon swept pore Pilot/Field volume in test zone Demonstration (contained 87 gal DNAPL before SEAR) 2,400 gallons Pilot/Field Demonstration Barrier island sediments 50 x 75 foot test area Pilot/Field Demonstration Full- Scale/Commercial Unspecified NA (Lab Study) Laboratory/Bench Scale Coastal Plain - The Surfical Aquifer (silty fine sand) Full- Scale/Commercial Unconsol. Seds. - Predom. Clay/Silt Laboratory/Bench Scale Unconsol. Seds. - Predom. Well Sorted Gulf Coast, well-sorted fine sand Sand/Gravel interbedded with clay Unconsol. Seds. - Predom. Well Sorted Very well sorted fine-grained sand Sand/Gravel underlain by clay confining layer at 45- 50 feet bgs Unconsol. Seds. - Poorly Sorted Predom. Coarse Grained FLSH0063 Dover AFB, Dover, DE Unconsol. Seds. - Poorly Sorted (Macromolecular Solubilization) Predom. Coarse Grained FLSH0064 Dover AFB, Dover, DE (Singlephase Microemulsion) Unconsol. Seds. - Poorly Sorted Predom. Coarse Grained FLSH0061 Dover AFB, Dover, DE (Test Unconsol. Seds. - Poorly Sorted Cell 2, Surfactant Solubilization) Predom. Coarse Grained Ground-Water Remediation Technologies Analysis Center Operated by CTC 1-800-373-1973 Lynch Heights and Columbia Fms. unconfined aquifer - silty, poorly sorted sands, potential for discontinuous clay lenses and gravely sand lenses Lynch Heights and Columbia Fms. unconfined aquifer - silty, poorly sorted sands, potential for discontinuous clay lenses and gravely sand lenses Lynch Heights and Columbia Fms. unconfined aquifer - silty, poorly sorted sands, potential for discontinuous clay lenses and gravely sand lenses Lynch Heights and Columbia Fms. unconfined aquifer - silty, poorly sorted sands, potential for discontinuous clay lenses and gravely sand lenses Page 15 4 to 6 acre extent source area 25 x 35 foot (875 ft2) test area Pilot/Field Demonstration Full- Scale/Commercial Pilot/Field Demonstration Pilot/Field Demonstration Pilot/Field Demonstration Pilot/Field Demonstration GWRTAC 1998 As of 11/17/98
Page 1 and 2: Technology Status Report Technology
Page 3 and 4: ABSTRACT This technology status rep
Page 5 and 6: LIST OF TABLES Table Title Page 1 I
Page 7 and 8: 1.0 INTRODUCTION / PURPOSE OF STATU
Page 9 and 10: a laboratory-scale project. As illu
Page 11 and 12: 3.1 Flushing Solutions 3.0 ANALYSIS
Page 13 and 14: (approximately eight) full-scale pr
Page 15 and 16: Table 1. In Situ Flushing - Summary
Page 17 and 18: Table 1. In Situ Flushing - Summary
Page 19: Table 1. In Situ Flushing - Summary
Page 23 and 24: Table 3 In Situ Flushing - Geology
Page 25 and 26: Table 3 In Situ Flushing - Geology
Page 27 and 28: Table 4 In Situ Flushing - Recovere
Page 33 and 34: Full-Scale/Commercial 26% Figure 2.
Page 35 and 36: Site Remediation 25% Figure 4. In S
Page 37 and 38: NAPL Removal 34% Figure 6. In Situ
Page 39 and 40: Figure 8. In Situ Flushing - Distri
Page 41 and 42: Number of Projects 35 30 25 20 15 1
Page 43 and 44: Number of Case Studies 45 40 35 30
Page 45 and 46: 25 ft and 50 ft and 10 ft and 100 f
Page 47 and 48: Unconfined Aquifer 65% Figure 16. I
Page 49 and 50: In Situ Flushing Project Summaries
Page 71 and 72:
In Situ Flushing Project Summaries
Page 73 and 74:
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
Page 79 and 80:
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
Page 131 and 132:
Page 133 and 134:
Page 135 and 136:
Page 137 and 138:
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
Page 147 and 148:
Page 149 and 150:
Page 151 and 152:
Page 153 and 154:
Page 155 and 156:
Page 157 and 158:
Page 159 and 160:
Page 161 and 162:
Page 163 and 164:
Page 165 and 166:
Page 167 and 168:
Page 169 and 170:
Page 171 and 172:
Page 173 and 174:
Page 175 and 176:
Page 177 and 178:
Page 179 and 180:
Page 181 and 182:
Page 183 and 184:
Page 185 and 186:
Page 187 and 188:
Page 189 and 190:
Page 191 and 192:
Page 193 and 194:
Page 195 and 196:
Page 197 and 198:
Page 199 and 200:
Page 201 and 202:
Page 203 and 204:
Page 205 and 206:
Page 207 and 208:
Page 209 and 210:
Page 211 and 212:
show all

Technology Status Report: In Situ Flushing - CLU-IN

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?