13.08.2013 Views

Technology Status Report: In Situ Flushing - CLU-IN

Technology Status Report: In Situ Flushing - CLU-IN

Technology Status Report: In Situ Flushing - CLU-IN

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>In</strong> <strong>Situ</strong> <strong>Flushing</strong> Project Summaries<br />

GWRTAC Case Study Database<br />

GWRTAC ID: FLSH0027<br />

Project Name: Lee Chemical, Liberty, MO<br />

City: Liberty State/Province: MO<br />

Primary GWRTAC Personal<br />

Communication Source<br />

(Name/Organization):<br />

Project Summary:<br />

Steve Kinser<br />

U.S. EPA<br />

<strong>Report</strong>(s)/Publication(s) (GWRTAC Source):<br />

U.S. EPA, Nov. 1996: <strong>In</strong>n. Trtmt. Techs.: Ann. <strong>Status</strong> Rpt. (8th Ed.), EPA 542-R-96-010, No. 8,<br />

U.S. EPA OSWER (5102G) TIO, Wash., DC<br />

<strong>In</strong>ternet URL http://www.epa.gov/superfund/index.htm<br />

The following text is from notes from an April 1997 and July 1998 conversations with the EPA RPM:<br />

The site is a Missouri-lead site, and is located one mile away from the Kansas City reach of the<br />

Missouri River; river loses water through this reach. Missouri River bottom sediments are<br />

contaminated with chlorinated solvents. <strong>Flushing</strong> project is targeting vadose zone by re-circulating<br />

untreated groundwater through four infiltration fields on site. There is no shallow confining layer<br />

beneath the site. The city wellfield is located significant distance from site, however, a preferential<br />

flowpath exists between one of these wells and the site. Water is pumped from one extraction well;<br />

approximately 700,000 gallons per day of water is pumped and infiltrated; there is no on-site<br />

treatment prior to re-injection. Over one recent three month period (April, May, June 1996), the<br />

total water applied to the site was a little over two million gallons.<br />

The site is to be remediated to MCLs. Performance results are not yet available. A five year<br />

review will be conducted in June 1998; EPA has not yet received a copy of the five year report, but<br />

indicated that the flushing system is operating without any problems. The city water supply has not<br />

been impacted by the operation. Project costs were not available from reference source.<br />

<strong>Report</strong>(s)/Publication(s) (Additional <strong>In</strong>formation Sources):<br />

U.S. EPA, Nov. 1996: <strong>In</strong>n. Trtmt. Techs.: Ann. <strong>Status</strong> Rpt. (8th Ed.), EPA 542-R-96-010, No. 8,<br />

U.S. EPA OSWER (5102G) TIO, Wash., DC<br />

<strong>In</strong>ternet URL http://www.epa.gov/superfund/index.htm<br />

Ground-Water Remediation Technologies Analysis Center<br />

Operated by Concurrent Technologies Corporation<br />

Appendix - Page 59 of 164<br />

Copyright GWRTAC 1998<br />

Revision 1<br />

Tuesday, November 17, 1998

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!