Technology Status Report: In Situ Flushing - CLU-IN

More documents

Recommendations

Info

In Situ Flushing Project Summaries GWRTAC Case Study Database Chad T. Jafvert, Purdue University, for GWRTAC, Pittsburgh, PA, available at www.gwrtac.org Jawitz, J.W., R.D. Rhue, M.D. Annable, and P.S.C. Rao, 1997: Executive Summarry of "Laboratory and Field Evalution of Single-Phase Microemulsions (SPME) ffor Enhanced In-situ Remediation of Contaminated Aquifers" Final Report, Nov. 28, 1997, Submitted to: DoD/AATDF, Rice University, Houston, TX Jawitz, J.W., M.D. Annable, P.S.C. Rao, and D. Rhue. 1997. "Field Testing of a Surfactant-Alcohol Mixture For In-Situ NAPL Solubilization As A Single-Phase Microemulsion," Extended Abstract. To be presented at the ACS annual meeting in San Francisco, April 1997. Montgomery Watson. 1995. "Final Interim Report: Evaluation of Bench Test Results for the Surfactant Flushing Treatability Study at Operable Unit 1, Hill Air Force Base, Utah." USAF Contract No. 2208.0804. Monthly Progress Reports are available from the Advanced Applied Technology Demonstration Facility for Environmental Technology, at DOD/AATDF, Rice University, Energy & Environmental Systems Institute, M.S. 316, P.O. Box 1892 (or 6100 S. Main St.), Houston, Texas 77251 (or 77005). Rice University, 1997: Technology Practices Manual for Surfactants and Cosolvents, Rice University, 6100 Main Street, Houston, TX 77005-1892, February 1997 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), April 1995: Status Report: Surfactant Enhancements, EPA 542-K-94-003, U.S. EPA OSWER (5102W), TIO, Washington, DC Ground-Water Remediation Technologies Analysis Center Operated by Concurrent Technologies Corporation Appendix - Page 40 of 164 Copyright GWRTAC 1998 Revision 1 Tuesday, November 17, 1998
In Situ Flushing Project Summaries GWRTAC Case Study Database GWRTAC ID: FLSH0019 Project Name: Hill Air Force Base, UT (OU2 - Micellar Flood) City: Layton State/Province: UT Primary GWRTAC Personal Communication Source (Name/Organization): Project Summary: Jon Ginn U.S. Air Force Report(s)/Publication(s) (GWRTAC Source): Ground-Water Remediation Technologies Analysis Center (GWRTAC), 1996: Surfactants/Cosolvents, Technology Evaluation Report TE-96-02, Dr. Chad T. Jafvert, Purdue University, GWRTAC, Pittsburgh, PA, December 1996, available at www.gwrtac.org Rice University, 1997: Technology Practices Manual for Surfactants and Cosolvents, Rice University, 6100 Main Street, Houston, TX 77005-1892, February 1997 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), April 1995: Status Report: Surfactant Enhancements, EPA 542-K-94-003, U.S. EPA OSWER (5102W), TIO, Washington, DC The following was excerpted from Ground-Water Remediation Technologies Analysis Center (GWRTAC), 1996: Surfactants/Cosolvents, Technology Evaluation Report TE-96-02, Dr. Chad T. Jafvert, Purdue University, GWRTAC, Pittsburgh, PA, December 1996, available at www.gwrtac.org, Rice University, 1997: Technology Practices Manual for Surfactants and Cosolvents, Rice University, 6100 Main Street, Houston, TX 77005-1892, February 1997, and Executive Summary of Demonstration of Surfactant-Enhanced Aquifer Remediation of Chlorinated Solvent DNAPL at Operable Unit 2, Hill AFB, UT, INTERA (a Duke Engineering & Services Company). Direct quotes are from Rice University, 1997: During the summer of 1996, INTERA conducted a successful demonstration of surfactantenhanced aquifer remediation (SEAR) in collaboration with the Center for Petroleum and Geosystems Engineering at the University of Texas at Austin (UT) and with Radian International. The US Air Force Center for Environmental Excellence (AFCEE) funded the necessary DNAPLzone characterization and surfactant-flood demonstration. The Center for Petroleum and Geosystems Engineering at UT funded the design of the surfactant floods, and Hill AFB near Ogden, Utah provided extensive logistical support. The University of Texas performed the design of the surfactant flood and a partitioning tracer test, and RADIAN International performed the treatment engineering. INTERA, Inc. was the principle contractor and performed all field injectionextraction operations and applied for all permits. As is documented in this report, SEAR meets the requirements set down by the Defense Department's DNAPL Integrated Product Team (IPT) for cost-effective detection and remediation of chlorinated-solvent DNAPL zones. The demonstration was conducted at Operable Unit 2 (OU2) at Hill AFB, which had received large volumes of chlorinated solvents from degreasing operations conducted at the base. OU2 is a closed chemical disposal area underlain by an alluvial sand aquifer confined on its sides and below Ground-Water Remediation Technologies Analysis Center Operated by Concurrent Technologies Corporation Appendix - Page 41 of 164 Copyright GWRTAC 1998 Revision 1 Tuesday, November 17, 1998
Page 1 and 2:
Technology Status Report Technology
Page 3 and 4:
ABSTRACT This technology status rep
Page 5 and 6:
LIST OF TABLES Table Title Page 1 I
Page 7 and 8:
1.0 INTRODUCTION / PURPOSE OF STATU
Page 9 and 10:
a laboratory-scale project. As illu
Page 11 and 12:
3.1 Flushing Solutions 3.0 ANALYSIS
Page 13 and 14:
(approximately eight) full-scale pr
Page 15 and 16:
Table 1. In Situ Flushing - Summary
Page 17 and 18:
Page 19 and 20:
Page 21 and 22:
Table 3 In Situ Flushing - Geology
Page 23 and 24:
Page 25 and 26:
Page 27 and 28:
Table 4 In Situ Flushing - Recovere
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34:
Full-Scale/Commercial 26% Figure 2.
Page 35 and 36:
Site Remediation 25% Figure 4. In S
Page 37 and 38: NAPL Removal 34% Figure 6. In Situ
Page 39 and 40: Figure 8. In Situ Flushing - Distri
Page 41 and 42: Number of Projects 35 30 25 20 15 1
Page 43 and 44: Number of Case Studies 45 40 35 30
Page 45 and 46: 25 ft and 50 ft and 10 ft and 100 f
Page 47 and 48: Unconfined Aquifer 65% Figure 16. I
Page 49 and 50: In Situ Flushing Project Summaries
Page 87: In Situ Flushing Project Summaries
Page 139 and 140:
In Situ Flushing Project Summaries
Page 141 and 142:
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
Page 147 and 148:
Page 149 and 150:
Page 151 and 152:
Page 153 and 154:
Page 155 and 156:
Page 157 and 158:
Page 159 and 160:
Page 161 and 162:
Page 163 and 164:
Page 165 and 166:
Page 167 and 168:
Page 169 and 170:
Page 171 and 172:
Page 173 and 174:
Page 175 and 176:
Page 177 and 178:
Page 179 and 180:
Page 181 and 182:
Page 183 and 184:
Page 185 and 186:
Page 187 and 188:
Page 189 and 190:
Page 191 and 192:
Page 193 and 194:
Page 195 and 196:
Page 197 and 198:
Page 199 and 200:
Page 201 and 202:
Page 203 and 204:
Page 205 and 206:
Page 207 and 208:
Page 209 and 210:
Page 211 and 212:
show all

Technology Status Report: In Situ Flushing - CLU-IN

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?