Schirmer Encyclopedia of Film
Schirmer Encyclopedia of Film
Schirmer Encyclopedia of Film
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Carlos Diegues. Ó FORESTIER YVES/CORBIS SYGMA.<br />
THE AESTHETICS OF HUNGER<br />
The history <strong>of</strong> Cinema Novo can be divided into three<br />
phases linked to major political events. The first phase<br />
lasted until the coup <strong>of</strong> 1964. It was a formative period<br />
dominated by a sense <strong>of</strong> political urgency aptly captured<br />
by neorealist, documentary-style narratives that went out<br />
to the streets to film popular subjects. Pereira dos<br />
Santos’s Rio 40 graus (Rio 40 Degrees, 1955) and Rio<br />
zona norte (Rio Northern Zone, 1957) followed the daily<br />
life <strong>of</strong> peanut-seller boys and a samba composer in the<br />
slums <strong>of</strong> Rio, while Rocha’s Barravento (The Turning<br />
Wind, 1962) laid bare the alienating function <strong>of</strong> religion<br />
and its clash with modern ideas in a traditional fishing<br />
community. Several seminal films were released in 1963,<br />
many <strong>of</strong> them located on the sertão, the mythical locus <strong>of</strong><br />
uncontaminated Brazilianness in the Northeastern backland:<br />
dos Santos’s Vidas secas (Barren Lives), Guerra’s Os<br />
fuzis (The Guns), and Rocha’s Deus e o diabo na terra do<br />
sol (Black God, White Devil ). Although Carlos Diegues’s<br />
Ganga Zumba retraces the roots <strong>of</strong> Afro-Brazilian culture,<br />
based as it is on the seventeenth-century maroon community<br />
<strong>of</strong> Palmares, it shares with the other films a<br />
Brazil<br />
similar concern with the socially and ethnically downtrodden<br />
and a similar optimism about the revolutionary<br />
creativity <strong>of</strong> the national-popular. As Rocha summed<br />
it up, these films ‘‘narrated, described, poeticized, discussed,<br />
analyzed, and stimulated the themes <strong>of</strong> hunger:<br />
characters eating dirt and roots, characters stealing to eat,<br />
characters killing to eat, characters fleeing to eat’’<br />
(‘‘Esthetic <strong>of</strong> Hunger,’’ in Johnson and Stam, p. 54).<br />
These are the bases for his aesthetics <strong>of</strong> hunger:<br />
‘‘Economic and political conditioning has led us to<br />
philosophical weakness and impotence....It is forthis reason that the hunger <strong>of</strong> Latin America is not simply an<br />
alarming symptom: it is the essence <strong>of</strong> our society’’<br />
(‘‘Esthetic <strong>of</strong> Hunger,’’ in Johnson and Stam, p. 56).<br />
Based on the homonymous novel by Graciliano<br />
Ramos and released amid widespread debates on land<br />
reform, Vidas secas tells the story <strong>of</strong> a family <strong>of</strong> landless<br />
peasants forced to migrate to the modern cities by cyclical<br />
droughts, endemic poverty, and quasi-feudal socioeconomic<br />
relations. Os fuzis tells the allegorical story <strong>of</strong> the<br />
conflicts that arise between the soldiers sent to a village in<br />
the sertão to protect the warehouse <strong>of</strong> the landowner and<br />
the starving peasants, whose initial passivity and fatalism<br />
seem to give way to some form <strong>of</strong> symbolic rebellion that<br />
will also change the soldiers’ minds. Deus e o diabo is a<br />
condensed allegory whose narrator, the blind singer-poet<br />
<strong>of</strong> cordel literature (Northeastern broadsheets), traverses<br />
tradition and modernity to tell the story <strong>of</strong> a peasant<br />
couple torn between following the messianic call <strong>of</strong> a<br />
religious leader shaped after the historical figure <strong>of</strong><br />
Antônio Conselheiro and adhering to the murderous rage<br />
<strong>of</strong> the last cangaceiro (a social bandit). Neither morality<br />
nor rationality prevails in this apocalyptic society shaped<br />
by colonial insanity. Deus e o diabo, its sequel, Antônio<br />
das Mortes, matador de cangaceiros (Antonio das Mortes,<br />
1969), and Terra em transe (Land in Anguish, 1967), all<br />
by Rocha, show an avant-garde experimentalism at its<br />
peak.<br />
Cinema Novo’s second phase lasted from 1964 to<br />
1968, when the AI-5 (Fifth Institutional Act) radicalized<br />
the repressive nature <strong>of</strong> the military regime. Despite this,<br />
during those years the counterculture and Cinema Novo<br />
continued to flourish. This uneasy marriage <strong>of</strong> convenience<br />
was due to the growth <strong>of</strong> state funding through the<br />
Instituto Nacional do Cinema (National <strong>Film</strong> Institute),<br />
which was established after GEICINE (Executive Group<br />
<strong>of</strong> the <strong>Film</strong> Industry), which provided financial support<br />
for the importation <strong>of</strong> equipment and the production <strong>of</strong><br />
films and established compulsory exhibition quotas for<br />
films. These nationalistic policies divided the field, and<br />
the improbable alliance inspired some films that directly<br />
addressed the role <strong>of</strong> middle-class intellectuals in social<br />
struggle, such as Rocha’s Terra em transe, O desafio (The<br />
SCHIRMER ENCYCLOPEDIA OF FILM 173