Schirmer Encyclopedia of Film
Schirmer Encyclopedia of Film
Schirmer Encyclopedia of Film
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Adaptation<br />
John Huston in Chinatown (Roman Polanski, 1974).<br />
EVERETT COLLECTION. REPRODUCED BY PERMISSION.<br />
in such films as The Letter (1940) and Of Human Bondage<br />
(1934).<br />
Classic American fiction has been less fortunate, on<br />
the whole. Victor Sjöström’s 1926 film <strong>of</strong> Nathaniel<br />
Hawthorne’s (1804–1864) The Scarlet Letter, starring a<br />
luminous Lillian Gish, is still by far the best version <strong>of</strong><br />
that book. Clarence Brown’s (1890–1987) silent version<br />
<strong>of</strong> Cooper’s The Last <strong>of</strong> the Mohicans (1920) is much<br />
superior to any later version, while films based on Mark<br />
Twain’s (1835–1910) work, such as The Adventures <strong>of</strong><br />
Tom Sawyer (1938, 1968 [TV]) or The Adventures <strong>of</strong><br />
Hucklebrry Finn (1939, 1960, 1985 [TV]) have generally<br />
been intended for children. John Huston (1906–1987)<br />
made a brave but doomed attempt at Herman Melville’s<br />
(1819–1891) Moby Dick in 1956; Billy Budd (1962),<br />
based on a much shorter work, directed by Peter<br />
Ustinov (1921–2004) and starring an appropriately<br />
angelic Terence Stamp (b. 1938), was more successful.<br />
The stories <strong>of</strong> Edgar Allan Poe have provided the basis<br />
for a whole series <strong>of</strong> films, notably for American<br />
International Pictures in the 1960s and 1970s, with few<br />
having much connection with the stories beyond the title,<br />
yet <strong>of</strong>ten, as with The Masque <strong>of</strong> the Red Death (1964)<br />
providing stylish and sophisticated entertainment. Edith<br />
Wharton’s (1862–1937) The Age <strong>of</strong> Innocence was,<br />
somewhat unexpectedly, turned into a film in 1993 that<br />
was both very close to its source and yet paralleled Martin<br />
Scorsese’s (b. 1942) more typical world <strong>of</strong> low-life gangsters<br />
with their own hierarchies, rituals, and penalties for<br />
refusing to conform.<br />
The major figures <strong>of</strong> twentieth-century American<br />
fiction have also been unevenly treated. Faulkner’s novels<br />
have generally proved remarkably resistant to adaptation,<br />
while Clarence Brown’s Intruder in the Dust (1949), from<br />
one <strong>of</strong> the author’s less complex works, was an effectively<br />
straightforward treatment. <strong>Film</strong>s based on Ernest<br />
Hemingway’s (1899–1961) fiction have fared best when<br />
they depart drastically from the original, as with Howard<br />
Hawks’s (1896–1977) To Have and Have Not (1944) or<br />
Robert Siodmak’s (1900–1973) expansion <strong>of</strong> the story<br />
The Killers (1946). John Steinbeck’s (1902–1968) The<br />
Grapes <strong>of</strong> Wrath provided the basis for John Ford’s classic<br />
but not particularly faithful film in 1940, and East <strong>of</strong><br />
Eden (1955) is memorable mostly for the performance <strong>of</strong><br />
James Dean (1931–1955) under the somewhat overheated<br />
direction <strong>of</strong> Elia Kazan (1909–2003), who also<br />
directed (more sedately) F. Scott Fitzgerald’s (1896–<br />
1940) unfinished The Last Tycoon (1976). Neither the<br />
1949 nor the 1974 version <strong>of</strong> The Great Gatsby is considered<br />
to be truly successful, despite the meticulous<br />
attention to period detail in the latter. The best films<br />
adapted from American literature, in fact, have come<br />
from works originally considered marginal or beneath<br />
serious literary attention.<br />
CASE STUDY: ADAPTATIONS<br />
OF CHARLES DICKENS<br />
Dickens has been by far the most filmed <strong>of</strong> English<br />
novelists, with something like one hundred versions in<br />
the silent era alone, and numerous further adaptations for<br />
both film and television, continuing to the present day.<br />
The earliest films could cope only with well-known incidents<br />
or brief character sketches from the books; the<br />
sheer length <strong>of</strong> the major novels has always proved a<br />
serious stumbling block. It was natural, then, that the<br />
first attempts at full-length treatment would be with<br />
shorter works such as A Christmas Carol, A Tale <strong>of</strong> Two<br />
Cities,orOliver Twist, all filmed several times each before<br />
1920.<br />
Though Dickens has <strong>of</strong>ten been called the most<br />
cinematic <strong>of</strong> novelists, his books are far from easy to film<br />
satisfactorily. The mixture <strong>of</strong> realism and symbolism,<br />
especially in the later novels, the <strong>of</strong>ten larger-than-life<br />
or grotesque characters, the first-person narration <strong>of</strong><br />
some books, the pervasive authorial narrative tone and<br />
commentary <strong>of</strong> others, the sheer scope and variety <strong>of</strong><br />
characters, incidents and settings, and the insistent social<br />
and moral analysis <strong>of</strong> the later works in particular, all<br />
42 SCHIRMER ENCYCLOPEDIA OF FILM