15.08.2013 Views

Schirmer Encyclopedia of Film

Schirmer Encyclopedia of Film

Schirmer Encyclopedia of Film

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Crime <strong>Film</strong>s<br />

Humphrey Bogart in the 1930s. EVERETT COLLECTION.<br />

REPRODUCED BY PERMISSION.<br />

<strong>of</strong>ten love to love as well. Because the possibility <strong>of</strong><br />

criminal behavior by victims like Frank Bigelow in the<br />

1950 D.O.A. and respected attorney George Simon in<br />

Counsellor at Law (1933) is what gives both innocent<br />

victims and pillars <strong>of</strong> institutional justice their dramatic<br />

possibilities, the label ‘‘crime film’’ rightly gives pride <strong>of</strong><br />

place to the criminal.<br />

The casting <strong>of</strong> key performers in the genre consistently<br />

reveals the remarkable affinities between movie<br />

victims and movie criminals, like the affinities Ruhm<br />

and McCarty establish between movie gangsters and<br />

movie detectives and indeed between criminals and characters<br />

outside the crime genre. In M (Germany, 1931),<br />

the murderous child molester Hans Beckert comes across<br />

as tormented and ultimately pitiable. This is partly<br />

because director Fritz Lang (1890–1976) keeps<br />

Beckert’s heinous crimes <strong>of</strong>f-camera, and partly because<br />

the plot focuses instead on his pursuit and entrapment by<br />

a criminal gang determined to get him <strong>of</strong>f the streets so<br />

that a reduced police presence will allow more breathing<br />

room for their own activities. But it is the performance<br />

by Peter Lorre (1904–1964) that most brings out the<br />

anguish, and finally the agony, in every move the sweaty<br />

little killer makes toward a new hiding place or a new<br />

attempt to explain his crimes. In his first important film<br />

role, Lorre makes the killer both monstrously evil and<br />

monstrously banal. Similarly, the portrayal by the iconic<br />

French actor Jean Gabin (1904–1976)—who specialized<br />

in stoic Everymen in films such as Les Bas-fonds (The<br />

Lower Depths, 1936) and La Grande Illusion (The Grand<br />

Illusion, 1937)—<strong>of</strong> doomed killers in Pépé le Moko<br />

(1937), La Bête humaine (The Human Beast, 1938),<br />

and Le Jour se lève (Daybreak, 1939) imparts a weary<br />

sense <strong>of</strong> honor and decency to characters who might<br />

otherwise come across as simple criminals.<br />

The Hollywood studios notoriously cast to type but<br />

recognize that typecasting inevitably expands and complicates<br />

the type. Although Paul Muni (1895–1967),<br />

who played Tony Camonte in Scarface (1931), resisted<br />

typecasting, two <strong>of</strong> the other preeminent screen gangsters,<br />

James Cagney (1899–1986) and Edward G.<br />

Robinson (1893–1973), played effectively within and<br />

against their menacing types even though neither was<br />

physically imposing. The appeal <strong>of</strong> Cagney and<br />

Robinson was elemental. Whether or not they were playing<br />

criminals, they were always riveting in their direct<br />

appeal to the camera and the audience. Yet the third great<br />

American star <strong>of</strong> crime films created a larger and more<br />

enduringly complex set <strong>of</strong> heroes than either <strong>of</strong> them.<br />

Humphrey Bogart (1899–1957) was a moody, worldweary<br />

figure hundreds <strong>of</strong> miles from a boyhood he could<br />

never remember. Robinson is the American immigrant<br />

on the make, Cagney the American innocent swept into<br />

crime by primitive urges he can neither understand nor<br />

control. Bogart is the American hero whose experience<br />

has left him with no illusions about anyone, least <strong>of</strong> all<br />

himself. His successors are the even more introverted<br />

Alan Ladd (1913–1964) and John Garfield (1913–<br />

1952). Ladd’s performance in This Gun for Hire (1942)<br />

established him as the most noncommittal <strong>of</strong> all crimefilm<br />

stars, the handsome hero whose dead eyes could<br />

conceal any emotion or none at all. Garfield, by contrast,<br />

specialized in wounded cubs, bruised boys who carried<br />

a deep vein <strong>of</strong> emotional vulnerability beneath their<br />

criminal portfolios in The Postman Always Rings Twice<br />

and Force <strong>of</strong> Evil (1948).<br />

These stars incarnate the American dialectic between<br />

striving and disillusionment, limitless optimism and cynical<br />

worldly wisdom at the heart <strong>of</strong> all crime films. After<br />

the demise <strong>of</strong> the studio system, actors had a freer hand<br />

in shaping their own career, but many <strong>of</strong> them followed<br />

the same path <strong>of</strong> invoking a single powerful persona that<br />

developed and deepened from film to film. Marlon<br />

Brando (1924–2004), the Method actor who rose to<br />

fame playing sensitive brutes under Elia Kazan’s direction<br />

(A Streetcar Named Desire, 1951; On the Waterfront,<br />

1954), seemed to bring all his complicated past to bear<br />

on his performance as the honorable, aging gang lord<br />

Vito Corleone in The Godfather. Kevin Spacey’s selfeffacing<br />

monsters in Se7en (1995) and The Usual<br />

Suspects (1995) darkened and deepened his equivocal<br />

404 SCHIRMER ENCYCLOPEDIA OF FILM

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!