Schirmer Encyclopedia of Film
Schirmer Encyclopedia of Film
Schirmer Encyclopedia of Film
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Crime <strong>Film</strong>s<br />
Humphrey Bogart in the 1930s. EVERETT COLLECTION.<br />
REPRODUCED BY PERMISSION.<br />
<strong>of</strong>ten love to love as well. Because the possibility <strong>of</strong><br />
criminal behavior by victims like Frank Bigelow in the<br />
1950 D.O.A. and respected attorney George Simon in<br />
Counsellor at Law (1933) is what gives both innocent<br />
victims and pillars <strong>of</strong> institutional justice their dramatic<br />
possibilities, the label ‘‘crime film’’ rightly gives pride <strong>of</strong><br />
place to the criminal.<br />
The casting <strong>of</strong> key performers in the genre consistently<br />
reveals the remarkable affinities between movie<br />
victims and movie criminals, like the affinities Ruhm<br />
and McCarty establish between movie gangsters and<br />
movie detectives and indeed between criminals and characters<br />
outside the crime genre. In M (Germany, 1931),<br />
the murderous child molester Hans Beckert comes across<br />
as tormented and ultimately pitiable. This is partly<br />
because director Fritz Lang (1890–1976) keeps<br />
Beckert’s heinous crimes <strong>of</strong>f-camera, and partly because<br />
the plot focuses instead on his pursuit and entrapment by<br />
a criminal gang determined to get him <strong>of</strong>f the streets so<br />
that a reduced police presence will allow more breathing<br />
room for their own activities. But it is the performance<br />
by Peter Lorre (1904–1964) that most brings out the<br />
anguish, and finally the agony, in every move the sweaty<br />
little killer makes toward a new hiding place or a new<br />
attempt to explain his crimes. In his first important film<br />
role, Lorre makes the killer both monstrously evil and<br />
monstrously banal. Similarly, the portrayal by the iconic<br />
French actor Jean Gabin (1904–1976)—who specialized<br />
in stoic Everymen in films such as Les Bas-fonds (The<br />
Lower Depths, 1936) and La Grande Illusion (The Grand<br />
Illusion, 1937)—<strong>of</strong> doomed killers in Pépé le Moko<br />
(1937), La Bête humaine (The Human Beast, 1938),<br />
and Le Jour se lève (Daybreak, 1939) imparts a weary<br />
sense <strong>of</strong> honor and decency to characters who might<br />
otherwise come across as simple criminals.<br />
The Hollywood studios notoriously cast to type but<br />
recognize that typecasting inevitably expands and complicates<br />
the type. Although Paul Muni (1895–1967),<br />
who played Tony Camonte in Scarface (1931), resisted<br />
typecasting, two <strong>of</strong> the other preeminent screen gangsters,<br />
James Cagney (1899–1986) and Edward G.<br />
Robinson (1893–1973), played effectively within and<br />
against their menacing types even though neither was<br />
physically imposing. The appeal <strong>of</strong> Cagney and<br />
Robinson was elemental. Whether or not they were playing<br />
criminals, they were always riveting in their direct<br />
appeal to the camera and the audience. Yet the third great<br />
American star <strong>of</strong> crime films created a larger and more<br />
enduringly complex set <strong>of</strong> heroes than either <strong>of</strong> them.<br />
Humphrey Bogart (1899–1957) was a moody, worldweary<br />
figure hundreds <strong>of</strong> miles from a boyhood he could<br />
never remember. Robinson is the American immigrant<br />
on the make, Cagney the American innocent swept into<br />
crime by primitive urges he can neither understand nor<br />
control. Bogart is the American hero whose experience<br />
has left him with no illusions about anyone, least <strong>of</strong> all<br />
himself. His successors are the even more introverted<br />
Alan Ladd (1913–1964) and John Garfield (1913–<br />
1952). Ladd’s performance in This Gun for Hire (1942)<br />
established him as the most noncommittal <strong>of</strong> all crimefilm<br />
stars, the handsome hero whose dead eyes could<br />
conceal any emotion or none at all. Garfield, by contrast,<br />
specialized in wounded cubs, bruised boys who carried<br />
a deep vein <strong>of</strong> emotional vulnerability beneath their<br />
criminal portfolios in The Postman Always Rings Twice<br />
and Force <strong>of</strong> Evil (1948).<br />
These stars incarnate the American dialectic between<br />
striving and disillusionment, limitless optimism and cynical<br />
worldly wisdom at the heart <strong>of</strong> all crime films. After<br />
the demise <strong>of</strong> the studio system, actors had a freer hand<br />
in shaping their own career, but many <strong>of</strong> them followed<br />
the same path <strong>of</strong> invoking a single powerful persona that<br />
developed and deepened from film to film. Marlon<br />
Brando (1924–2004), the Method actor who rose to<br />
fame playing sensitive brutes under Elia Kazan’s direction<br />
(A Streetcar Named Desire, 1951; On the Waterfront,<br />
1954), seemed to bring all his complicated past to bear<br />
on his performance as the honorable, aging gang lord<br />
Vito Corleone in The Godfather. Kevin Spacey’s selfeffacing<br />
monsters in Se7en (1995) and The Usual<br />
Suspects (1995) darkened and deepened his equivocal<br />
404 SCHIRMER ENCYCLOPEDIA OF FILM