Schirmer Encyclopedia of Film
Schirmer Encyclopedia of Film
Schirmer Encyclopedia of Film
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Class<br />
some analysts have pointed out) but for their ability to<br />
provide simple entertainment. Among the formulas<br />
dusted <strong>of</strong>f and repackaged was the Horatio Alger narrative.<br />
In Rocky (1976) and Saturday Night Fever (1977),<br />
working-class men make better lives for themselves<br />
through sheer determination and hard work, with littleto-no<br />
discussion <strong>of</strong> the institutionalized forces that, in the<br />
real world, work to inhibit such mobility. Such optimistic<br />
messages would continue in popular American film<br />
for the rest <strong>of</strong> the century, from teen comedies such as<br />
Risky Business (1983) or Pretty in Pink (1986) to biopics<br />
such as Erin Brockovich (2000) or Ray (2004).<br />
Certain trends in European cinema also began celebrating<br />
old-fashioned ideas <strong>of</strong> glamorous wealth and<br />
happy workers. Most particularly, the rise <strong>of</strong> British<br />
‘‘heritage films’’ exuded nostalgia for the era before<br />
World War I, reveling in well-groomed manor grounds,<br />
lavishly appointed drawing rooms, and tuxedos and satin<br />
ball gowns. A number <strong>of</strong> similarly glossy films from other<br />
countries, such as Nuovo cinema Paradiso (Cinema<br />
Paradiso, Italy, 1989), Mediterraneo (Italy, 1991), Como<br />
agua para chocolate (Like Water for Chocolate, Mexico,<br />
1992), and Belle Epoque (Spain, 1993) portrayed peasant<br />
life in a golden hue <strong>of</strong> romanticism. Such films <strong>of</strong>ten<br />
seemed like cinematic postcards, packaging the country<br />
(and its quaint working-class customs) for tourists to<br />
purchase.<br />
By the start <strong>of</strong> the twenty-first century, the communist<br />
government <strong>of</strong> the Soviet Union had collapsed, and<br />
China had begun integrating itself into the international<br />
economy. A new era <strong>of</strong> triumphant capitalism (dubbed<br />
‘‘late capitalism’’ by philosopher Herbert Marcuse<br />
[1898–1979]) seemed to have dawned. Much <strong>of</strong> contemporary<br />
cinema (and mass media generally) reflects the<br />
increased commodification <strong>of</strong> life. From Hollywood<br />
summer blockbusters to Japanese anime, modern cinema<br />
functions simultaneously as a product and as an advertisement<br />
for related products—the video, the soundtrack<br />
CD, the computer game, the collectible figures, the<br />
theme park ride. Hollywood studios (and many media<br />
companies worldwide) were subsumed into larger international<br />
corporate identities toward the end <strong>of</strong> the twentieth<br />
century. Thus, many films were meant to keep the<br />
pr<strong>of</strong>its flowing from all the various arms <strong>of</strong> a conglomerate<br />
rather than to expose how the rich were getting<br />
richer and the poor were getting poorer.<br />
Yet some filmmakers wished to expose the class<br />
struggles that remained. Often focusing on groups rather<br />
than Horatio Alger protagonists, directors like Mike<br />
Leigh (b. 1943) (Life Is Sweet, 1990) in Britain, Denys<br />
Arcand (b. 1941) (Les Invasions Barbares [The Barbarian<br />
Invasions], 2003) in Canada, John Sayles (b. 1950)<br />
(Matewan, 1987) in the United States, and Hou Hsaio-<br />
Hsien (b. 1947) (Beiqing Chengshi [City <strong>of</strong> Sadness],<br />
1990) in Taiwan depicted the complex nature <strong>of</strong> economics<br />
and class, and how they interrelate with issues<br />
such as gender and sexuality, national identity, history,<br />
and religious belief. While their work was <strong>of</strong>ten overlooked<br />
by audiences, such efforts kept the spirit <strong>of</strong> such<br />
early cinema as The Kleptomaniac alive as the new millennium<br />
began.<br />
SEE ALSO Ideology; Marxism; Neorealism; Populism;<br />
Propaganda<br />
FURTHER READING<br />
Bergman, Andrew. We’re in the Money: Depression America and Its<br />
<strong>Film</strong>s. New York: New York University Press, 1971.<br />
Ceplair, Larry, and Steven Englund. The Inquisition in<br />
Hollywood: Politics in the <strong>Film</strong> Community, 1930–1960.<br />
Garden City, NY: Anchor Press/Doubleday, 1980.<br />
Compaine, Benjamin M., and Douglas Gomery. Who Owns the<br />
Media? Competition and Concentration in Mass Media<br />
Industry. 3rd ed. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 2000. Originally<br />
published in 1982.<br />
Downing, John D. H., ed. <strong>Film</strong> and Politics in the Third World.<br />
New York: Praeger, 1987.<br />
Harvey, Sylvia. May ’68 and <strong>Film</strong> Culture. London: British <strong>Film</strong><br />
Institute, 1978.<br />
Hill, John. Sex, Class and Realism: British Cinema, 1956–1963.<br />
London: British <strong>Film</strong> Institute, 1986.<br />
Overbey, David, ed. Springtime in Italy: A Reader on Neo-Realism.<br />
London: Talisman, 1978.<br />
Ross, Steven J. Working-Class Hollywood: Silent <strong>Film</strong> and the<br />
Shaping <strong>of</strong> Class in America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton<br />
University Press, 1998.<br />
Ryan, Michael, and Douglas Kellner. Camera Politica: The<br />
Politics and Ideology <strong>of</strong> Contemporary Hollywood <strong>Film</strong>.<br />
Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1988.<br />
Youngblood, Denise J. Soviet Cinema in the Silent Era,<br />
1918–1935. Ann Arbor, MI: UMI Research Press, 1985.<br />
Sean Griffin<br />
310 SCHIRMER ENCYCLOPEDIA OF FILM