15.08.2013 Views

Schirmer Encyclopedia of Film

Schirmer Encyclopedia of Film

Schirmer Encyclopedia of Film

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Class<br />

some analysts have pointed out) but for their ability to<br />

provide simple entertainment. Among the formulas<br />

dusted <strong>of</strong>f and repackaged was the Horatio Alger narrative.<br />

In Rocky (1976) and Saturday Night Fever (1977),<br />

working-class men make better lives for themselves<br />

through sheer determination and hard work, with littleto-no<br />

discussion <strong>of</strong> the institutionalized forces that, in the<br />

real world, work to inhibit such mobility. Such optimistic<br />

messages would continue in popular American film<br />

for the rest <strong>of</strong> the century, from teen comedies such as<br />

Risky Business (1983) or Pretty in Pink (1986) to biopics<br />

such as Erin Brockovich (2000) or Ray (2004).<br />

Certain trends in European cinema also began celebrating<br />

old-fashioned ideas <strong>of</strong> glamorous wealth and<br />

happy workers. Most particularly, the rise <strong>of</strong> British<br />

‘‘heritage films’’ exuded nostalgia for the era before<br />

World War I, reveling in well-groomed manor grounds,<br />

lavishly appointed drawing rooms, and tuxedos and satin<br />

ball gowns. A number <strong>of</strong> similarly glossy films from other<br />

countries, such as Nuovo cinema Paradiso (Cinema<br />

Paradiso, Italy, 1989), Mediterraneo (Italy, 1991), Como<br />

agua para chocolate (Like Water for Chocolate, Mexico,<br />

1992), and Belle Epoque (Spain, 1993) portrayed peasant<br />

life in a golden hue <strong>of</strong> romanticism. Such films <strong>of</strong>ten<br />

seemed like cinematic postcards, packaging the country<br />

(and its quaint working-class customs) for tourists to<br />

purchase.<br />

By the start <strong>of</strong> the twenty-first century, the communist<br />

government <strong>of</strong> the Soviet Union had collapsed, and<br />

China had begun integrating itself into the international<br />

economy. A new era <strong>of</strong> triumphant capitalism (dubbed<br />

‘‘late capitalism’’ by philosopher Herbert Marcuse<br />

[1898–1979]) seemed to have dawned. Much <strong>of</strong> contemporary<br />

cinema (and mass media generally) reflects the<br />

increased commodification <strong>of</strong> life. From Hollywood<br />

summer blockbusters to Japanese anime, modern cinema<br />

functions simultaneously as a product and as an advertisement<br />

for related products—the video, the soundtrack<br />

CD, the computer game, the collectible figures, the<br />

theme park ride. Hollywood studios (and many media<br />

companies worldwide) were subsumed into larger international<br />

corporate identities toward the end <strong>of</strong> the twentieth<br />

century. Thus, many films were meant to keep the<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>its flowing from all the various arms <strong>of</strong> a conglomerate<br />

rather than to expose how the rich were getting<br />

richer and the poor were getting poorer.<br />

Yet some filmmakers wished to expose the class<br />

struggles that remained. Often focusing on groups rather<br />

than Horatio Alger protagonists, directors like Mike<br />

Leigh (b. 1943) (Life Is Sweet, 1990) in Britain, Denys<br />

Arcand (b. 1941) (Les Invasions Barbares [The Barbarian<br />

Invasions], 2003) in Canada, John Sayles (b. 1950)<br />

(Matewan, 1987) in the United States, and Hou Hsaio-<br />

Hsien (b. 1947) (Beiqing Chengshi [City <strong>of</strong> Sadness],<br />

1990) in Taiwan depicted the complex nature <strong>of</strong> economics<br />

and class, and how they interrelate with issues<br />

such as gender and sexuality, national identity, history,<br />

and religious belief. While their work was <strong>of</strong>ten overlooked<br />

by audiences, such efforts kept the spirit <strong>of</strong> such<br />

early cinema as The Kleptomaniac alive as the new millennium<br />

began.<br />

SEE ALSO Ideology; Marxism; Neorealism; Populism;<br />

Propaganda<br />

FURTHER READING<br />

Bergman, Andrew. We’re in the Money: Depression America and Its<br />

<strong>Film</strong>s. New York: New York University Press, 1971.<br />

Ceplair, Larry, and Steven Englund. The Inquisition in<br />

Hollywood: Politics in the <strong>Film</strong> Community, 1930–1960.<br />

Garden City, NY: Anchor Press/Doubleday, 1980.<br />

Compaine, Benjamin M., and Douglas Gomery. Who Owns the<br />

Media? Competition and Concentration in Mass Media<br />

Industry. 3rd ed. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 2000. Originally<br />

published in 1982.<br />

Downing, John D. H., ed. <strong>Film</strong> and Politics in the Third World.<br />

New York: Praeger, 1987.<br />

Harvey, Sylvia. May ’68 and <strong>Film</strong> Culture. London: British <strong>Film</strong><br />

Institute, 1978.<br />

Hill, John. Sex, Class and Realism: British Cinema, 1956–1963.<br />

London: British <strong>Film</strong> Institute, 1986.<br />

Overbey, David, ed. Springtime in Italy: A Reader on Neo-Realism.<br />

London: Talisman, 1978.<br />

Ross, Steven J. Working-Class Hollywood: Silent <strong>Film</strong> and the<br />

Shaping <strong>of</strong> Class in America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton<br />

University Press, 1998.<br />

Ryan, Michael, and Douglas Kellner. Camera Politica: The<br />

Politics and Ideology <strong>of</strong> Contemporary Hollywood <strong>Film</strong>.<br />

Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1988.<br />

Youngblood, Denise J. Soviet Cinema in the Silent Era,<br />

1918–1935. Ann Arbor, MI: UMI Research Press, 1985.<br />

Sean Griffin<br />

310 SCHIRMER ENCYCLOPEDIA OF FILM

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!