High Performance Microchip Supply - Under Secretary of Defense ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

DFAR SUPPLEMENT ____________________________________________________________ e. Custom microelectronic devices that are analog in nature (e.g. radio frequency amplifiers, custom analog hybrids) that do not contain any digital logic. 4. The restriction in paragraph (b) of this clause may be waived upon request from the Contractor in accordance with subsection 225.7009-3 of the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement. The Contractor must provide compelling rationale for waiver of this restriction, and the waiver must be approved in writing by the DOD Trusted Foundry Program Office. 5. The Contractor shall retain records showing compliance with the restriction in paragraph (b) of this clause until 3 years after final payment and shall make the records available upon request of the Contracting Officer. 6. The Contractor shall insert this clause, including this paragraph (f) in all subcontracts, except those for— f. Commercial items other than Application Specific Integrated Circuits; or g. Items that do not contain Application Specific Integrated Circuits _________________________________________________________ DSB TASK FORCE ON 102
_________________________________________________________________ APPENDIX I APPENDIX I. MINORITY REPORT Essential portions of this report with which I heartily concur are the pressing need for greater chip security, continued future supply guarantees via a trusted foundry, and acquisition reform to lay the foundation for a stronger DOD infrastructure. My dissent takes issue with the depth of analysis of the data this committee received and the recommendations relating to the semiconductor industry. In my view, aspects relating to financial support of semiconductor industry activities, especially extraordinary DOD support, are not supported by business strategies and logic based on this committee's investigation. To be more blunt, it is not DOD's job to re-vamp the infrastructure of this healthy, robust and very profitable industry, rather, DOD interest's have to be evaluated in a cost benefit analysis such as DARPA routinely performs based on the DOD mission. Our nation would be better served if government provided the catalyst or leadership (non-financial support), apparently missing in the semiconductor industry, to facilitate a better semiconductor industry long term strategic plan. Dr. Thomas Hartwick Defense Science Board High Performance Microchip Supply Task Force Member HIGH PERFORMANCE MICROCHIP SUPPLY ___________________________________________ 103
Page 1 and 2:
Defense Science Board Task Force On
Page 4:
This page intentionally left blank.
Page 8 and 9:
TABLE OF CONTENTS__________________
Page 10 and 11:
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY _________________
Page 12 and 13:
Page 14 and 15:
Page 16 and 17:
Page 18 and 19:
Page 20 and 21:
Page 22 and 23:
INTRODUCTION ______________________
Page 24 and 25:
INTRODUCTION ______________________
Page 26 and 27:
INTRODUCTION ______________________
Page 28 and 29:
INTRODUCTION ______________________
Page 30 and 31:
INTRODUCTION ______________________
Page 32 and 33:
INTRODUCTION ______________________
Page 34 and 35:
FINDINGS __________________________
Page 36 and 37:
FINDINGS __________________________
Page 38 and 39:
FINDINGS __________________________
Page 40 and 41:
FINDINGS __________________________
Page 42 and 43:
FINDINGS __________________________
Page 44 and 45:
FINDINGS __________________________
Page 46 and 47:
FINDINGS __________________________
Page 48 and 49:
FINDINGS __________________________
Page 50 and 51:
FINDINGS __________________________
Page 52 and 53:
FINDINGS __________________________
Page 54 and 55:
FINDINGS __________________________
Page 56 and 57:
FINDINGS __________________________
Page 58 and 59:
FINDINGS __________________________
Page 60 and 61:
FINDINGS __________________________
Page 62 and 63: RECOMMENDATIONS ___________________
Page 88: TERMS OF REFERENCE ________________
Page 92 and 93: TERMS OF REFERENCE ________________
Page 94: DEPUTY SECRETARY OF DEFENSE MEMO __
Page 98 and 99: FUTURE TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT _____
Page 104 and 105: RANDY GOODALL SEMATECH ____________
Page 106 and 107: TRUSTED FOUNDRY PROGRAM ___________
Page 108 and 109: TRUSTED FOUNDRY PROGRAM ___________
Page 110 and 111: COMPARISON OF ASIC AND FPGA SYSTEM
Page 114 and 115: MINORITY REPORT ___________________
Page 116 and 117: ACRONYMS __________________________
Page 118: ___________________________________
show all

High Performance Microchip Supply - Under Secretary of Defense ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?