16.08.2013 Views

High Performance Microchip Supply - Under Secretary of Defense ...

High Performance Microchip Supply - Under Secretary of Defense ...

High Performance Microchip Supply - Under Secretary of Defense ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

RECOMMENDATIONS ____________________________________________________________<br />

elsewhere (recommendation 2). The department should estimate the<br />

number and varieties <strong>of</strong> microelectronic components that require<br />

trustworthiness as an aid to planning the size and scope <strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>Defense</strong> Trusted Integrated Circuits Strategy 35 (recommendation 3).<br />

Access to the necessary design and manufacturing capability requires<br />

that DOD purchase products and services from leading-edge<br />

semiconductor firms in a way acceptable to the government, its<br />

systems contractors, and to the component suppliers. DOD needs a<br />

focused, tailored acquisition plan, driven by a long-term vision <strong>of</strong> its<br />

semiconductor needs, to establish the basis, policy, and operating<br />

guidelines for DOD-enabled access to trusted foundry services by the<br />

department, its contractors, and others. (For instance, the status <strong>of</strong><br />

foundry-supplied components as government-furnished equipment<br />

must be clarified as well as payment policies. [recommendation 4]).<br />

Cost and manufacturing technology trends are making design and<br />

fabrication <strong>of</strong> limited-volume ASICs prohibitively expensive. New<br />

low-volume chip manufacturing models and fabrication equipment<br />

are required if future defense systems are to have unique<br />

microelectronics hardware capabilities at a reasonable cost. The same<br />

requirement for economical, modest-volume ICs is developing for<br />

future commercial products. A reexamination <strong>of</strong> economic models<br />

for producing low-volume products will require a joint government -<br />

industry program to develop new, more flexible factory technology<br />

capable <strong>of</strong> meeting both defense and commercial needs<br />

(recommendation 5). The United States and its allies still maintain<br />

regimes <strong>of</strong> export controls for defense-critical and dual-use<br />

technology and equipment as one approach for limiting some<br />

technology transfers to potential adversaries (recommendation 6).<br />

Recommendations follow addressing specific technologies unique to<br />

use <strong>of</strong> programmable “standard” components (such as PLAs, MPUs<br />

and DSPs), defense applications and assurance <strong>of</strong> component<br />

trustworthiness (including design techniques), DOD-unique<br />

technologies, and countertamper pr<strong>of</strong>iciency (recommendations 7, 8,<br />

and 9).<br />

35. Memo from the Deputy <strong>Secretary</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Defense</strong>, “<strong>Defense</strong> Trusted Integrated Circuits<br />

Strategy”, dated October 10, 2003, Ref. U16619/03 - see Appendix C.<br />

56 _________________________________________________________ DSB TASK FORCE ON

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!