High Performance Microchip Supply - Under Secretary of Defense ...
High Performance Microchip Supply - Under Secretary of Defense ...
High Performance Microchip Supply - Under Secretary of Defense ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
__________________________________________________________________ FINDINGS<br />
they may be subject to overriding national control in times <strong>of</strong> stress.<br />
While a trusted leading-edge supplier concept may provide nearterm<br />
risk reduction, over the long term, additional risk mitigation<br />
and risk management strategies must be developed.<br />
Acquisition efforts must be buttressed by both legal and technical<br />
efforts to protect U.S. technical leadership and intellectual property in<br />
the microelectronics domain. This includes maintaining and<br />
nurturing the U.S. electronics skill base through continuing, stable<br />
research funding (see appendix D). Research is particularly<br />
important at this time, as the traditional growth <strong>of</strong> IC capability<br />
shows signs <strong>of</strong> slowing; new device concepts and structures will be<br />
needed to continue device advances on which future defense systems<br />
concepts are predicated. The alternative is a future in which the same<br />
hardware technology is universally available, to friend and foe alike.<br />
In the long term, if potential adversaries become leaders in<br />
microelectronics technologies, the United States may find itself the<br />
target <strong>of</strong> “reverse-ITAR” restrictions on critical electronics<br />
capabilities. The United States must maintain sufficient control and<br />
influence over microelectronics research, design, fabrication, and<br />
testing to satisfy U.S. microelectronics requirements for the indefinite<br />
future.<br />
Developments in the semiconductor industry parallel similar<br />
trends in the s<strong>of</strong>tware field. This similarity should be no surprise,<br />
since both fields deal with inherently complex designs; they require<br />
technically similar design techniques and tools. Additionally,<br />
s<strong>of</strong>tware is the key to how hardware behaves; a matching subversion<br />
<strong>of</strong> a combination <strong>of</strong> hardware and s<strong>of</strong>tware (especially in the case <strong>of</strong><br />
programmable logic devices [PLDs] and field programmable logic<br />
[CPLDs 34 and FPGAs]) could be impossible to detect. Other<br />
technologies, such as printed circuit boards, may be affected, but to a<br />
much lesser extent.<br />
34. Complex Programmable Logic Devices, or CPLDs, are predecessors <strong>of</strong> FPGAs which<br />
are suitable for simple logic applications.<br />
HIGH PERFORMANCE MICROCHIP SUPPLY ___________________________________________<br />
53