16.08.2013 Views

High Performance Microchip Supply - Under Secretary of Defense ...

High Performance Microchip Supply - Under Secretary of Defense ...

High Performance Microchip Supply - Under Secretary of Defense ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

__________________________________________________________________ FINDINGS<br />

they may be subject to overriding national control in times <strong>of</strong> stress.<br />

While a trusted leading-edge supplier concept may provide nearterm<br />

risk reduction, over the long term, additional risk mitigation<br />

and risk management strategies must be developed.<br />

Acquisition efforts must be buttressed by both legal and technical<br />

efforts to protect U.S. technical leadership and intellectual property in<br />

the microelectronics domain. This includes maintaining and<br />

nurturing the U.S. electronics skill base through continuing, stable<br />

research funding (see appendix D). Research is particularly<br />

important at this time, as the traditional growth <strong>of</strong> IC capability<br />

shows signs <strong>of</strong> slowing; new device concepts and structures will be<br />

needed to continue device advances on which future defense systems<br />

concepts are predicated. The alternative is a future in which the same<br />

hardware technology is universally available, to friend and foe alike.<br />

In the long term, if potential adversaries become leaders in<br />

microelectronics technologies, the United States may find itself the<br />

target <strong>of</strong> “reverse-ITAR” restrictions on critical electronics<br />

capabilities. The United States must maintain sufficient control and<br />

influence over microelectronics research, design, fabrication, and<br />

testing to satisfy U.S. microelectronics requirements for the indefinite<br />

future.<br />

Developments in the semiconductor industry parallel similar<br />

trends in the s<strong>of</strong>tware field. This similarity should be no surprise,<br />

since both fields deal with inherently complex designs; they require<br />

technically similar design techniques and tools. Additionally,<br />

s<strong>of</strong>tware is the key to how hardware behaves; a matching subversion<br />

<strong>of</strong> a combination <strong>of</strong> hardware and s<strong>of</strong>tware (especially in the case <strong>of</strong><br />

programmable logic devices [PLDs] and field programmable logic<br />

[CPLDs 34 and FPGAs]) could be impossible to detect. Other<br />

technologies, such as printed circuit boards, may be affected, but to a<br />

much lesser extent.<br />

34. Complex Programmable Logic Devices, or CPLDs, are predecessors <strong>of</strong> FPGAs which<br />

are suitable for simple logic applications.<br />

HIGH PERFORMANCE MICROCHIP SUPPLY ___________________________________________<br />

53

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!