26.08.2013 Views

THE QUERY PROJECT - European Commission - Europa

THE QUERY PROJECT - European Commission - Europa

THE QUERY PROJECT - European Commission - Europa

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Co u n t R y R E P o R t S<br />

hungary<br />

Dr.-Ing. Zoltán Lovász<br />

lovaszkft@axelero.hu<br />

Qualifications<br />

Prerequisites for an career as a reconstructionist are at the<br />

moment: no previous conviction, a university degree in the<br />

according faculty and a minimum of 5 years of practice in the<br />

field. If an according university degree does not exist, a secondary<br />

school degree with 10 years of practice suffices.<br />

In former times, reconstruction experts employed by governmental<br />

organs had to pass an examination at the start of their<br />

work. A significant part of the part time experts was registered<br />

before the political turn – without special studies and qualifications.<br />

After the political turn, the decree on experts (as released<br />

by the Ministry of Transport as the supervision organ) has been<br />

altered. According to the new decree, accident analyses may only<br />

be carried out by experts who have taken part in the according<br />

engineering courses at the Faculty of Traffic Engineering at the<br />

Technical University of Budapest.<br />

This means, that due to the – somewhat arbitrary and strict<br />

– interpretation of the decree, the prerequisites are: a university<br />

degree (5 years of studies), post-graduate engineering studies (2.5<br />

years) and 5 years of working in the field.<br />

(Within the circle of experts, there is a demand for correct forms<br />

of education and examination as an alternative to the post-graduate<br />

studies, which are time-consuming an expensive. At the same<br />

time, also the continuity of the post-graduate course is appreciated,<br />

so that the reconstructionist may choose his personal way<br />

of education.)<br />

I would also like to mention that the expert’s professional and<br />

otherwise qualification is also examined by other forums; I will<br />

explain this in more detail in the following part.<br />

Certification<br />

At the request of the expert candidate, he will be put on the<br />

experts lists that is edited by the Ministry of Justice. After a check<br />

that he has never been convicted and that he is a member of a<br />

trade association (for instance the chamber of engineers or the<br />

chamber of physicians), the Ministry of justice will call for opinions<br />

about the expert<br />

• from the territorial responsible chamber of court experts<br />

• from the territorial responsible court<br />

• from the ministry that is responsible for supervision of professionals.<br />

By means of this information, the minister will than decide to<br />

accredit or reject the candidate. Accredited experts, i.e. those with<br />

a register entry, are obliged to apply for membership in the territorial<br />

responsible chamber of court experts (because only members<br />

of the organisation are allowed to appear at court).<br />

According to the current regulations, the registration of the<br />

expert is of unlimited duration. Experts use a stamp which does<br />

not follow any defined design rules.<br />

During the procedure, the expert acts either as an expert (if he is<br />

accredited, regardless whether he is employed by a governmental<br />

institution, working independently or just a part-time expert) or<br />

as a so-called casual expert (without registration).<br />

According to the current rules, accredited experts are not<br />

obliged to undergo further training (though there is a brisk<br />

demand, as the wide-spread participation in voluntary training<br />

courses shows).<br />

Still after accession to the EU, the regulations considering the<br />

position of the forensic expert are under responsibility of the single<br />

state. The certification tentatively introduced 4 years ago for<br />

car experts (including reconstructionists) has been very popular<br />

amongst the experts, but it has never been officially accepted<br />

and not even supported by the chamber of forensic experts. One<br />

reason for the interest may have been a demand for a qualification<br />

procedure putting less financial demands on the apprentice. On<br />

the other hand, the problem arose that the prerequisites regarding<br />

the professional education were not checked.<br />

Position of the expert<br />

At the moment, about 4500 experts are registered in the list<br />

edited by the Ministry of Justice, 20% of them being active (i.e.<br />

they are regularly assigned by the authorities). These experts are<br />

mostly engineers (nearly 50%), including vehicle experts and<br />

amongst them the reconstructionists.<br />

Reconstructionists are mostly assigned by the authorities,<br />

private mandates occur quite seldom, though they are permitted<br />

according to the principle of free evidence.<br />

The expert’s report is a possible mean of proof and has to be<br />

taken into account as such, in criminal as well as civil proceedings.<br />

Export testimony is usually given in written form and may<br />

be complemented either in written or oral form. In criminal<br />

proceedings, summons of the expert are more common than in<br />

civil proceedings.<br />

Private experts are assigned by the litigant party or the defendant<br />

in order to prepare the trial or to check a written report that<br />

has already been given. At the moment, the position of the private<br />

expert is rather weak in comparison to that of the court expert.<br />

Since the code of criminal procedure has been altered, the defendant<br />

or his attorney may tell the public prosecutor that he wants<br />

to have an expert at the trial. The expert hired that way can take<br />

part in the proceeding, if the court and the public prosecutor<br />

accept this.<br />

If the court has difficulties to understand the report or it<br />

contains contradictions, that may not be eliminated by an oral<br />

examination of the expert, another expert is assigned. In case that<br />

there are already multiple and contradictory expert opinions in the<br />

trial, the civil court will call for a superior expert commission. (This<br />

is assigned exclusively with the task to explain the contradictions,<br />

not to give a new report.)<br />

If there are contradictory expert opinions in a criminal proceeding,<br />

an additional expert may be hired to explain the sources of<br />

contradiction. He may also give advice how one of the reports has<br />

to be complemented, or whether a completely new report should<br />

be given on the case.<br />

In criminal proceedings, the defence may also apply to replace<br />

the proposed expert during some time interval after the reading<br />

of the charge. The court has to allow this request.<br />

The experts has to identify himself as such by his expert identity<br />

card. After having been advised about the consequences of false<br />

testimony, he is heard by the court.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!