GAMMON INDIA LIMITED
GAMMON INDIA LIMITED
GAMMON INDIA LIMITED
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS<br />
Save as described below, the Company believes that the Company and its subsidiaries are not involved in any legal<br />
proceedings and in the opinion of the Company no proceedings are threatened, which may have, or have had during<br />
the 12 months preceding the date of this Preliminary Placement Document, a material adverse effect on the<br />
Company’s business, financial position, profitability or results of operations.<br />
Proceedings initiated in India<br />
Criminal proceedings<br />
1. Geetha Bore Wells (―Complainant‖) has filed a complaint with the metropolitan magistrate court, Cyberabad<br />
against the Company, Abhijit Rajan, Peter Gammon, Himanshu Parikh and others (―Accused‖) under the<br />
provisions of the Indian Penal Code, 1908 (―Penal Code‖). The Complainant has alleged that Accused parties<br />
are guilty of criminal breach of trust under the provisions of the Penal Code as they have forcefully obtained<br />
the custody of entire machinery and equipments belonging to the Complainant. The magistrate had directed<br />
inquiry in the said matter. The Company has obtained interim stay on the proceedings pending in the court of<br />
metropolitan magistrate and its order directing inquiry from the High Court of Andhra Pradesh. The matter is<br />
pending.<br />
2. The Inspector Security Guard Board for Greater Bombay and Thane districts (―Complainant‖) had filed a<br />
complaint with the additional chief metropolitan magistrate court, Mumbai, against the Company, Abhijit<br />
Rajan, Himanshu Parekh and others (―Petitioners‖), alleging that the Company had employed security guards<br />
of M/s. National Security Services at its andheri premises. The additional chief metropolitan magistrate court<br />
took cognizance of the above complaint and issued process. The Petitioners have filed a writ petition in the<br />
High Court, Bombay for quashing the order of issue of process. The High Court has stayed the further<br />
proceedings of the magistrate court. The matter is pending.<br />
3. The labour enforcement inspector (central), Nagpur (―Complainant‖) has filed two complaints against the<br />
erstwhile ATSL and others before the judicial magistrate first class, Amravati and chief judicial magistrate,<br />
Akola under sections 23 and 24 of Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970, respectively. The<br />
Complainant has alleged that ATSL failed to maintain register of persons, did not issue wage slip, and failed<br />
to keep first aid box. The charges have been denied. The matters are pending.<br />
4. The labour enforcement inspector (central), Nagpur (―Complainant‖) has filed a complaint against the<br />
erstwhile ATSL and others before the chief judicial magistrate, Wardha under section 47 of the Building and<br />
Other Construction Workers (Regulation and Employment and Conditions of Service) Act, 1996. The<br />
Complainant has alleged that ATSL failed to make any provisions for essential life saving aids and<br />
appliances to be kept at the site. The matter is pending for framing of charges.<br />
5. The government labour officer (―Complainant‖) has filed a complaint before judicial magistrate first class,<br />
Nagpur, against ATSL through D.C Bagde, Director for non observance of provisions of Contract Labour<br />
(Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970 at Hingana factory taken on lease from Sunrise Engineering Limited.<br />
The matter is pending.<br />
Civil proceedings<br />
6. Dena Bank (―Applicant‖) and filed an application against Satav Infrastructure Private Limited (―Defendant‖)<br />
and others, including the Company in the DRT, Pune. The joint venture involving the Company was made a<br />
144