24.11.2013 Views

Stefan Wirtz Vom Fachbereich VI (Geographie/Geowissenschaften ...

Stefan Wirtz Vom Fachbereich VI (Geographie/Geowissenschaften ...

Stefan Wirtz Vom Fachbereich VI (Geographie/Geowissenschaften ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Experimentelle Rinnenerosionsforschung vs. Modellkonzepte – Quantifizierung der hydraulischen und erosiven Wirksamkeit von Rinnen<br />

scheme was that we could not collect the whole water at a MP, so we had to take aliquots. At<br />

the beginning we expected the highest fluctuations, hence the distance between sample 1 and<br />

2 was lower than between sample 2 and 3 and sample 3 and 4. Depending on the flow length<br />

to the MP it was possible that after 3 minutes the runoff stopped at this point, we had to take<br />

the samples before this occurred.<br />

At each MP, rill cross section was measured. With thin metal sticks, the distance between<br />

ground level and rill bottom was measured in 0.002 m steps. This allowed an accurate<br />

calculation of the rill’s cross section area and an estimation of the rill’s volume. Additionally,<br />

the water depth at a certain point in the rill was measured several times using a yardstick. By<br />

combining the rill cross section and the water depth it was possible to calculate flow area,<br />

wetted perimeter and hydraulic radius using the georeferencing tool of a GIS.<br />

2.3 Descriptors for soil detachment<br />

The relationship between detachment rate and detachment capacity and respectively the<br />

relationship between transport rate and transport capacity are important values for assessing<br />

different processes acting in the rill. These variables were calculated as follow:<br />

DC = K<br />

r<br />

(τ τcr<br />

) (Foster et al., 1995) Eq. (1)<br />

T<br />

1.5<br />

C<br />

= K<br />

t<br />

R τ<br />

(modified from Wagenbrenner et al., 2010) Eq. (2)<br />

SC<br />

V A<br />

DR =<br />

Eq. (3)<br />

L WP<br />

TR = SC<br />

V A<br />

Eq. (4)<br />

with D C = detachment capacity [kg m -2 s -1 ], K r = rill erodibility factor [s m -1 ], τ = shear stress<br />

[Pa], τ cr = critical shear stress [Pa], T C = transport capacity [kg s -1 ], K t = transport coefficient<br />

[s² m 0.5 kg -0.5 ], R = hydraulic radius [m], D R = detachment rate [kg m -2 s -1 ], S C = sediment<br />

concentration [g L -1 ], V = flow velocity [m s -1 ], A = flow area [m²], L = flow length [m], WP<br />

= wetted perimeter [m], T R = transport rate [kg s -1 ].<br />

The rill erodibility factor K r can be calculated for cropland or rangeland; in this case, we used<br />

the equation of Flanagan and Livingston (1995) for cropland. Parameters are very fine sand<br />

content (vfs) and organic material content (org.Mat.).<br />

K<br />

1.84(org.<br />

Mat.<br />

)<br />

r<br />

= 0.00197 + 0.0003 (vfs) + 0.03863<br />

Eq. (5)<br />

Depending on land use, the parameters for the critical shear stress are clay content and very<br />

fine sand content (Flanagan and Livingston, 1995).<br />

τ c<br />

= 2.67 + 0.065 (clay) 0.058 (vfs)<br />

Eq. (6)<br />

142

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!