24.11.2013 Views

Stefan Wirtz Vom Fachbereich VI (Geographie/Geowissenschaften ...

Stefan Wirtz Vom Fachbereich VI (Geographie/Geowissenschaften ...

Stefan Wirtz Vom Fachbereich VI (Geographie/Geowissenschaften ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Experimentelle Rinnenerosionsforschung vs. Modellkonzepte – Quantifizierung der hydraulischen und erosiven Wirksamkeit von Rinnen<br />

Amounts of material which were moved on existing trails parallel to contour lines range<br />

between the values measured on the abandoned fields in downslope direction with 8.5° and<br />

12° slopes (experiment 1).<br />

In a first experiment, we changed the running speed after the 5 th run and measured fine<br />

material as well rock fragment translocation. In a second experiment with constant slow<br />

running speed, we wanted to ensure to have measured the influence of different speed in the<br />

first experiment, not the influence of a longer trampling time and higher animal quantity.<br />

In the first experiment (figure 4a) rock fragments were not moved in the first 5 slow runs.<br />

From run 6 onwards, the running speed of the animals was increased so that the goats were<br />

now really 'running' along the trail, just in a way that can be regarded as typical for faster<br />

movements of flocks. This faster movement lead to an increase of the translocation quantity<br />

by the factor five, but with a temporal lag, because it was recorded only in the 7 th run.<br />

Afterwards this trend decreased. Now, in addition to the higher fine material amount, rock<br />

fragments were moved in runs 7 to 10. Their proportion rose and fell from 31 % in the 7 th run<br />

over 35 % and 29 % down to 9 % in the last run. Altogether 4134 g of material was moved in<br />

this experiment, 1237 g or 30 % of this material were rock fragments (see figure 4a).<br />

In the second experiment, hardly any rock fragments were present on the plot. In mean, 145 g<br />

material was moved in each run, this is similar to the 155 g measured in the slow runs in<br />

experiment 2a.<br />

Interpretation:<br />

The similar mean values of the 4 slow runs in experiment 2a and the 9 runs in experiment 2b<br />

show that the differences between the slow and the fast runs in experiment 2a are caused by<br />

the different running speeds and not by trampling time and animal quantity.<br />

In the trail experiment, the measured translocation rates parallel to contour lines reached<br />

values around 1.3 g m -2 per goat for the slow runs which is comparable to the values measured<br />

on the abandoned field. At the higher running speed, as it is more typical for the trails, the<br />

translocation rate was five times higher with 5.9 g m -2 per goat. In the following experiment,<br />

it is clearly to see that the speed influences the translocation rate and not the longer trampling<br />

time and the higher number of animals. That means the running speed is an important<br />

parameter for the quantity of translocated material. The movement of rock fragments again<br />

can only be observed after the passing of about 300 goats.<br />

3.3 Translocation direction and distance of rock fragments<br />

238

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!