24.11.2013 Views

Stefan Wirtz Vom Fachbereich VI (Geographie/Geowissenschaften ...

Stefan Wirtz Vom Fachbereich VI (Geographie/Geowissenschaften ...

Stefan Wirtz Vom Fachbereich VI (Geographie/Geowissenschaften ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Experimentelle Rinnenerosionsforschung vs. Modellkonzepte – Quantifizierung der hydraulischen und erosiven Wirksamkeit von Rinnen<br />

Table 6: Comparison of the runoff values of the Arnás catchment and the rill catchments; c.a.<br />

= catchment area<br />

Arnás c.a. 284 ha RE1 c.a. 450 m² RE2 c.a. 400 m²<br />

specific average runoff [l s -1 /m²] 0.0001 0.00007 0.00008<br />

specific runoff peak [l s -1 /m²] 0.0004 0.0001 0.0002<br />

It is to notice, that the connectivity between rill and river is not given in each case. The<br />

sediment and the water from the rill may not reach the river. The river transports the material<br />

from those areas that have a connectivity to the river. The trails improve the connectivity, but<br />

in some cases, it is not sufficient.<br />

Accordingly the rills can be regarded as very effective sediment providers for the receiving<br />

waters in a catchment because they can cause heavy sediment losses with relatively low<br />

runoff amounts: the calculated specific runoff values of the rills are clearly lower than the<br />

specific runoff values of the Arnás catchment. But this lower specific runoffs reach the same<br />

sediment concentrations as the Arnás catchment (table 6).<br />

The results clearly indicate that the rill erosion in the Arnás catchment, despite the relatively<br />

low measured values, is characterized by a high efficiency.<br />

The given standardized experimental setup makes it possible to compare different rills and to<br />

take statements about their efficiency for runoff and sediment budget of a catchment. Only<br />

with comparable conditions concerning water quantity and inflow intensity, it becomes<br />

possible to achieve appropriate statements on the basis of the measured results and to compare<br />

single experiments to each other at least qualitatively or semi-quantitatively.<br />

Measuring the slope is very important, but it has to be considered, that only average values<br />

over 1 meter slope length are measured. The position and the elevation of the knickpoints in<br />

the rill must be recorded exactly and accounted in the analysis.<br />

Using colour tracers, it became possible to record changes in flow velocity. This can be<br />

caused for example by the overflow of a plunge pool, a process, that delivers a lot of water<br />

and sediment in a short time. Without the knowledge of a change in flow velocity, the notice<br />

of an increase in sediment concentration could cause a wrong conclusion.<br />

In these experiments, 72 l of water are discharged with an intensity of 9 l min -1 into a rill, an<br />

intensity also used in laboratory experiments by POLYAKOV & NEARING (2003). They<br />

measured clearly higher sediment concentrations. That means, under other conditions, this<br />

water quantity is sufficient to cause higher sediment loss. The Arnás catchment is still as<br />

90

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!