24.11.2013 Views

Stefan Wirtz Vom Fachbereich VI (Geographie/Geowissenschaften ...

Stefan Wirtz Vom Fachbereich VI (Geographie/Geowissenschaften ...

Stefan Wirtz Vom Fachbereich VI (Geographie/Geowissenschaften ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Experimentelle Rinnenerosionsforschung vs. Modellkonzepte – Quantifizierung der hydraulischen und erosiven Wirksamkeit von Rinnen<br />

s -1 . Tracer 1 shows a higher maximum value in the first run (0.52 m s -1 ) than in the second run<br />

(0.38 m s -1 ), whereas the mean values are similar reaching 0.09 m s -1 in the first and 0.1 m s -1<br />

in the second run. The maximum velocity value of tracer 2 is measured in the first run with<br />

1.35 m s -1 compared to 1.09 m s -1 in the second run. The average is also higher in the first run<br />

with 0.17 m s -1 against 0.13 m s -1 in the second run. The minimum velocities are 0.03 m s -1 in<br />

the second run for the waterfront, tracer 1 and also tracer 2; in the first run, the minimum of<br />

front and first tracer is 0.02 m s -1 , the lowest flow velocity of tracer 2 is 0.04 m s -1 .<br />

In experiment 3 variations can be detected as well but they are not as high as in the first<br />

experiment. The water does not reach the rill's end in the first run but the movement stops<br />

after 11m. The waterfront shows again the lowest flow velocities and is cached by tracer 1 in<br />

the first run after 6.5 m, in the second run after 13 m. The two tracers show again very similar<br />

flow velocities, until tracer 1 outruns the waterfront and turns into the waterfront itself. The<br />

maximum velocity of the waterfront is 0.04 m s -1 in the first run and 0.06 m s -1 in the second<br />

run. The averages are 0.02 m s -1 and 0.03 m s -1 respectively. Tracer 1 reaches 0.25 m s -1 in the<br />

first run and 0.27 m s -1 in the second run, the average is 0.06 m s -1 and 0.07 m s -1 . Also tracer 2<br />

shows a higher maximum in the second run with 0.28 m s -1 against 0.11 m s -1 in the first run<br />

and mean values of 0.05 m s -1 in the first and 0.08 m s -1 in the second run. The minimum<br />

values are 0.01 m s -1 for the front, tracer 1 and tracer 2 in both runs.<br />

Table 5: Overview over the sediment concentrations of the rill experiments<br />

rill 1 rill 2 rill 3<br />

Factor 1a 1b 2a 2b 3a 3b<br />

MAX [g l -1 ] 2.06 2.31 2.37 6.31 2.31 1.59<br />

MIN [g l -1 ] 0 0.05 0 0.3 0 0<br />

MEAN [g l -1 ] 0.78 0.69 0.82 2.21 0.83 0.88<br />

86

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!