24.11.2013 Views

Stefan Wirtz Vom Fachbereich VI (Geographie/Geowissenschaften ...

Stefan Wirtz Vom Fachbereich VI (Geographie/Geowissenschaften ...

Stefan Wirtz Vom Fachbereich VI (Geographie/Geowissenschaften ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Experimentelle Rinnenerosionsforschung vs. Modellkonzepte – Quantifizierung der hydraulischen und erosiven Wirksamkeit von Rinnen<br />

Experiments 3a, b and c show that on average 85 % of all marked rock fragments were<br />

mobilized after the passing of 45 goats. As figure 5 illustrates, the main direction of<br />

translocation throughout all 3 experiments is forward downslope (segment 1) with an average<br />

proportion of 57 % of all moved rock fragments. Also true for all 3 experiments is the fact<br />

that significantly more rock fragments were pushed forward than backward (on average 62 %<br />

to 28 %). Hence, the goats’ moving direction and slope direction seem to correlate with the<br />

translocation direction of our rock fragments. As expected, the results of experiment 3c show<br />

that gravity plays an increasingly important role once slope is steeper. Here, 86 % of all<br />

moved rock fragments were relocated downslope, compared with 70 % in experiments 3a and<br />

b combined. Furthermore, the input proportion in the forward directions (segments 1 and 4) is<br />

heavily skewed in favor of the forward downslope compartment with a ratio of 71 % to 10 %,<br />

compared with 44 % to 18 % and 56 % to 16 % in experiments 3a and b, respectively. This<br />

indicates a change in the trajectory of the kicked rock fragments due to steeper slope. Rock<br />

fragments that would come to a halt in segment 4 on a flatter slope, now land in segment 1.<br />

This hypothesis is also nicely supported by the analysis of the sub segments 1a and b. Since<br />

the input quantities are similar for both sub segments in experiments 3a and b, they do not<br />

allow for a judgment of whether the goats’ moving direction or slope has a higher impact on<br />

the rock fragments relocation. In experiment 3c, however, where slope is much steeper (11°),<br />

the input in segment 1a is more than twice as high as in 1b. Likely, this result can be ascribed<br />

to an additional input of rock fragments in 1a, which on flatter slopes would have remained in<br />

segment 4.<br />

Finally, the distribution of rock fragments across all 4 segments, i.e. all directions, is<br />

noteworthy. The hooves’ impact cannot be easily translated into a forward-downslope kicking<br />

direction of rock fragments. While this is true for the lion’s share of all measured rock<br />

fragments, segments 2, 3 and 4 constantly contained at least some of the total quantity.<br />

Interestingly, the highest mean translocation distances were not always recorded in the<br />

forward-downslope direction. In fact, this was only the case in experiment 3b. In experiments<br />

3a and 3c, the upslope segments 3 and 4, respectively, show the highest values. However,<br />

since few rock fragments were moved into these segments and the mean is calculated, outliers<br />

can easily affect the result.<br />

As expected, the mean translocation distance increases with slope. Whereas it is 6.2 cm for<br />

experiments 3a and b put together, the impact of gravity clearly surfaces in experiment 3c,<br />

where it is 14.1 cm. On analyzing the results of the sub segments 1a (forward-forwarddownslope)<br />

and 1b (downslope-forward) in all 3 experiments, the impetus of the factor slope<br />

242

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!