Stefan Wirtz Vom Fachbereich VI (Geographie/Geowissenschaften ...
Stefan Wirtz Vom Fachbereich VI (Geographie/Geowissenschaften ...
Stefan Wirtz Vom Fachbereich VI (Geographie/Geowissenschaften ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Experimentelle Rinnenerosionsforschung vs. Modellkonzepte – Quantifizierung der hydraulischen und erosiven Wirksamkeit von Rinnen<br />
Using one of the Navier-Stokes equations, an incompressible fluid can be completely<br />
described; thus reducing hydrodynamic questions to a mathematical problem. But this<br />
problem consists of a system of second order nonlinear partial differential equations which<br />
require the most powerful computers to numerically solve even the easiest cases. For the<br />
general, 3-dimensional case, existence- uniqueness- and regularity statements are not yet<br />
proven. Indeed, the Clay Mathematics Institute (CMI) included this in their “Millennium<br />
Prize Problems” which represent the most important open problems in mathematics, and has<br />
offered a prize of US$ 1,000,000 for a solution or a counter example (Constantin, 2001,<br />
Fefferman, 2006, Seiler, 2002, Schneider, 2008, Temam, 2000, Wiegner, 1999).<br />
The inconsistencies between the experimental results and the process based model<br />
assumptions can be the consequence of several reasons, such as uncertainties in measurements<br />
on the one hand or, on the other hand, inconsistent and incomplete process representations<br />
within the models. Uncertainty in the measurement of soil erosion has been a strong point of<br />
discussion (Stroosnijder, 2005), which is certainly still not fully resolved. The experimental<br />
setup applied in this study aimed to minimize systematic errors and their propagation. The<br />
design of the inlet, the flume for runoff measurement and the monitoring of flow and<br />
sediment transport reduced disturbance to a minimum (<strong>Wirtz</strong> et al., 2010, <strong>Wirtz</strong> et al., 2012).<br />
The results of measurements were also within the range measured in other experiments (e.g.<br />
Knapen et al., 2007). This, in combination with qualitative process observations made during<br />
the experiments, allows us to draw the conclusion that the source of errors is found in the<br />
model concepts.<br />
In models, different parameters play an important role. It is to distinguish between the<br />
hydraulic parameter flow shear stress τ and the soil parameter critical shear stress τ c or τ cr .<br />
Shear stress exerted by flow must exceed the critical shear stress to cause erosion. In critical<br />
shear stress calculations, soil parameters like dry bulk density, grain size distribution and<br />
organic content are used, in shear stress calculation hydraulic parameters, roughness, flow<br />
velocity and fluid density are variables. Different research groups deleted or added different<br />
factors to adapt the equation to their research topic. As a consequence, the equations for<br />
calculating transport and detachment capacity, critical shear stress and shear stress have<br />
different forms in different publications.<br />
We assumed that shear stress or critical shear stress values are always defined in the unit [Pa<br />
= kg m -1 s -2 ]. Note that in each paper where the units of the variables were not always given,<br />
we assumed [Pa] when no other unit was defined by the author and calculated the unknown<br />
units of the used parameters considering this default. For a better comparison with the original<br />
159