24.11.2013 Views

Stefan Wirtz Vom Fachbereich VI (Geographie/Geowissenschaften ...

Stefan Wirtz Vom Fachbereich VI (Geographie/Geowissenschaften ...

Stefan Wirtz Vom Fachbereich VI (Geographie/Geowissenschaften ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Experimentelle Rinnenerosionsforschung vs. Modellkonzepte – Quantifizierung der hydraulischen und erosiven Wirksamkeit von Rinnen<br />

Using one of the Navier-Stokes equations, an incompressible fluid can be completely<br />

described; thus reducing hydrodynamic questions to a mathematical problem. But this<br />

problem consists of a system of second order nonlinear partial differential equations which<br />

require the most powerful computers to numerically solve even the easiest cases. For the<br />

general, 3-dimensional case, existence- uniqueness- and regularity statements are not yet<br />

proven. Indeed, the Clay Mathematics Institute (CMI) included this in their “Millennium<br />

Prize Problems” which represent the most important open problems in mathematics, and has<br />

offered a prize of US$ 1,000,000 for a solution or a counter example (Constantin, 2001,<br />

Fefferman, 2006, Seiler, 2002, Schneider, 2008, Temam, 2000, Wiegner, 1999).<br />

The inconsistencies between the experimental results and the process based model<br />

assumptions can be the consequence of several reasons, such as uncertainties in measurements<br />

on the one hand or, on the other hand, inconsistent and incomplete process representations<br />

within the models. Uncertainty in the measurement of soil erosion has been a strong point of<br />

discussion (Stroosnijder, 2005), which is certainly still not fully resolved. The experimental<br />

setup applied in this study aimed to minimize systematic errors and their propagation. The<br />

design of the inlet, the flume for runoff measurement and the monitoring of flow and<br />

sediment transport reduced disturbance to a minimum (<strong>Wirtz</strong> et al., 2010, <strong>Wirtz</strong> et al., 2012).<br />

The results of measurements were also within the range measured in other experiments (e.g.<br />

Knapen et al., 2007). This, in combination with qualitative process observations made during<br />

the experiments, allows us to draw the conclusion that the source of errors is found in the<br />

model concepts.<br />

In models, different parameters play an important role. It is to distinguish between the<br />

hydraulic parameter flow shear stress τ and the soil parameter critical shear stress τ c or τ cr .<br />

Shear stress exerted by flow must exceed the critical shear stress to cause erosion. In critical<br />

shear stress calculations, soil parameters like dry bulk density, grain size distribution and<br />

organic content are used, in shear stress calculation hydraulic parameters, roughness, flow<br />

velocity and fluid density are variables. Different research groups deleted or added different<br />

factors to adapt the equation to their research topic. As a consequence, the equations for<br />

calculating transport and detachment capacity, critical shear stress and shear stress have<br />

different forms in different publications.<br />

We assumed that shear stress or critical shear stress values are always defined in the unit [Pa<br />

= kg m -1 s -2 ]. Note that in each paper where the units of the variables were not always given,<br />

we assumed [Pa] when no other unit was defined by the author and calculated the unknown<br />

units of the used parameters considering this default. For a better comparison with the original<br />

159

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!