24.11.2013 Views

Stefan Wirtz Vom Fachbereich VI (Geographie/Geowissenschaften ...

Stefan Wirtz Vom Fachbereich VI (Geographie/Geowissenschaften ...

Stefan Wirtz Vom Fachbereich VI (Geographie/Geowissenschaften ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Experimentelle Rinnenerosionsforschung vs. Modellkonzepte – Quantifizierung der hydraulischen und erosiven Wirksamkeit von Rinnen<br />

covered with grass. The rock fragment cover is about 10%. The dominating runoff process<br />

mapped for this rill is HOF.<br />

The second rill is a naturally developed rill on an abandoned field with an average slope of<br />

11° and a maximum slope of 16°. This medium developed rill (width between 5 and 20cm,<br />

depth between 5 and 10 cm) shows a dense rock fragment cover (about 30%) and is only<br />

partially (about 10%) grass-covered. The dominating runoff process is the SOF.<br />

Rill 3 is also a naturally developed rill, that has cut into an old slump. The average slope is<br />

11.3° and the maximum slope 14.5°. The rill is rather deeply incised with width between 10<br />

and 50 cm and depth between 15 and 20 cm. It shows a dense rock fragment cover of about<br />

30% and almost no vegetation cover (about 5%). Rill 3 was just tested over 15 m, because it<br />

was expected that the water would not reach the 25 m standard test length on the slump<br />

material. So, also the slope was just measured over the 15 m. (Fig. 3) The dominating runoff<br />

process is also SOF.<br />

Fig. 2: Profiles of the 3 rills. The measuring points are also marked.<br />

75

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!