24.11.2013 Views

Stefan Wirtz Vom Fachbereich VI (Geographie/Geowissenschaften ...

Stefan Wirtz Vom Fachbereich VI (Geographie/Geowissenschaften ...

Stefan Wirtz Vom Fachbereich VI (Geographie/Geowissenschaften ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Experimentelle Rinnenerosionsforschung vs. Modellkonzepte – Quantifizierung der hydraulischen und erosiven Wirksamkeit von Rinnen<br />

the 9 L min -1 – experiments ranged between 67.5 (75 % quartile) and 42.8 % (25 % quartile),<br />

in the 250 L min -1 – experiments most RMEs were between 51.3 and 29.9 %. The highest<br />

RMEs were 93.1 and 131.4 %, the lowest values were 9.5 and 26.7 %; the medians were 55.8<br />

and 41.3 %. The RCs showed lower variations than the sediment concentrations, most RMEs<br />

were between 48.3 and 13.9 %, the maximum value was 75.4 %, the minimum 0.3 % and the<br />

median 20.8 %. The reason for the higher variations in sediment concentrations were “special<br />

events” such as bank failure and headcut retreat. Such processes increased the sediment<br />

concentration for a certain time period while the runoff stayed about constant.<br />

Figure 2: Results of the rill experiments: Sediment concentrations of the 6 runs of the 3 rill<br />

experiments with an inflow intensity of 9 L min -1 (A), sediment concentrations of the 8 runs<br />

of the 4 rill experiments with an inflow intensity higher than 250 L min -1 (B), runoff<br />

coefficients of all rill experiments (C), relative measurements errors of the sediment<br />

concentrations (separated in experiments with an inflow intensity of 9 L min -1 and an inflow<br />

intensity higher than 250 L min -1 ) and the runoff coefficients (D).<br />

46

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!