Yellowstone's Northern Range - Greater Yellowstone Science ...
Yellowstone's Northern Range - Greater Yellowstone Science ...
Yellowstone's Northern Range - Greater Yellowstone Science ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
THE NORTHERN RANGE<br />
88<br />
not aware of a decline in big sagebrush anywhere<br />
else on the mule deer winter range, and lacking any<br />
other lines of evidence, we can speculate that the<br />
sagebrush decline may be due to heavy, year-round<br />
use by pronghorn. To further complicate this<br />
question, the sagebrush decline seems to be<br />
restricted to the Wyoming subspecies, and mostly<br />
to high ground such as ridges, upland slopes, and<br />
rolling terrain with a high soil clay component. In<br />
the lower areas and swales where the basin<br />
subspecies dominates, sagebrush is tall, abundant,<br />
and apparently vigorous.<br />
The composition of the northern <strong>Yellowstone</strong><br />
mule deer herd has been estimated each year since<br />
1990 using a helicopter. These surveys show a<br />
steady increase in the proportion of adult males in<br />
the herd, presumably in response to modifications<br />
of hunting regulations promulgated by the Montana<br />
Department of Fish, Wildlife and Parks.<br />
PRONGHORN<br />
Early accounts of the greater <strong>Yellowstone</strong><br />
ecosystem report large numbers of pronghorn in all<br />
the major river valleys radiating out from the<br />
present park area (Figure 7.9). Agriculture,<br />
settlement, and market hunting were probably<br />
responsible for the demise of these large, continuous<br />
populations. Many accounts of the northern<br />
range prior to 1882 also mention frequent sightings<br />
of pronghorn, but these are reports of summering<br />
animals (Schullery and Whittlesey 1992). It does<br />
not appear that the park contains significant winter<br />
range for pronghorn; their winter range is at lower<br />
elevations downstt'eam of the north park boundary,<br />
where they are competing with a growing amount<br />
of human activity and development (Figure 7.10).<br />
Pronghorn is a species of special interest on<br />
the northern range because their numbers have at<br />
times been very low, causing concerns over their<br />
genetic wellbeing and even their long-term survival<br />
as a population entity (Appendix B) (Barmore<br />
1980, Houston 1982, O'Gara 1990, Scott and<br />
Geisser 1996). Lee et al. (1994) added a further<br />
reason for special interest: <strong>Yellowstone</strong> pronghorn<br />
carry a unique genetic element (mtDNA haplotype<br />
J) found in no other pronghorn herd in the west.<br />
Surprisingly, the <strong>Yellowstone</strong> pronghorn contains<br />
more genetic diversity than any other North<br />
American herd studied, yet has never received<br />
stocked pronghorn from elsewhere. The authors<br />
stated:<br />
The pronghorn herd of <strong>Yellowstone</strong><br />
National Park is one of the few remaining<br />
undisturbed populations. The most<br />
parsimonious explanation for the great<br />
amount of mtDNA variation in the<br />
<strong>Yellowstone</strong> herd is that <strong>Yellowstone</strong><br />
was a refuge when other herds were<br />
exterminated or greatly reduced. This<br />
genetic resource should be conserved.<br />
<strong>Yellowstone</strong> pronghorn populations of 550 to<br />
700 were reported in the 1930s, and these increased<br />
to 600 to 800 in the 1940s following the addition of<br />
Figure 7.9.<br />
Pronghorn were<br />
extremely abundant<br />
in the lower river<br />
valleys of greater<br />
<strong>Yellowstone</strong> prior to<br />
the creation of the<br />
park in 1872.<br />
Because of its small<br />
sile alld isolation,<br />
the northern<br />
YellowstOlle<br />
pronghorn<br />
population is at<br />
some risk of<br />
extinction. NPS<br />
photo.