Yellowstone's Northern Range - Greater Yellowstone Science ...
Yellowstone's Northern Range - Greater Yellowstone Science ...
Yellowstone's Northern Range - Greater Yellowstone Science ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
WOODY VEGETATION<br />
45<br />
horn diet, 23 percent of the mule deer diet, 4<br />
percent of the elk diet, and 0.1 percent of the bison<br />
diet during the winters 1985-1988. But the<br />
declines were restricted mostly to the Wyoming<br />
subspecies, as well as to the mountain subspecies<br />
of big sagebrush; these declines occurred mostly on<br />
rolling upland topography. Sagebrush on lower<br />
slopes, swales, and drainages, which is mostly the<br />
basin subspecies, was as tall and vigorous as it was<br />
across most of the northern range. Thus, detailed<br />
study at three exclosures in the lower area and five<br />
exclosures in the upper area, as well as extensive<br />
foot and horseback reconnaissance of the rest of the<br />
northern range, indicates that big sagebrush is<br />
suppressed by ungulates and declining on about 3<br />
percent of the range in the park, and is either<br />
holding its own or increasing on the other 97<br />
percent.<br />
Mehus (1995) found that on the northern<br />
range outside the park, big sagebmsh was "the<br />
most significant item in mule deer diets, averaging<br />
33 percent of the diet across 9 sites." It is not<br />
possible to attribute this high level of winter use of<br />
sagebrush to the elk population; Mehus (1995)<br />
found that big sagebrush averaged 3 percent of the<br />
diets of elk in the same area, and winter use of<br />
sagebrush was equally high in the 1960s when elk<br />
and pronghorn were reduced to about 25 percent of<br />
their late-1980s numbers (Singer and Renkin<br />
1995). It should be noted that because elk are so<br />
much more abundant than pronghorn on the<br />
northern range, even very low consumption rates of<br />
sagebrush by individual elk could result in a large<br />
cumulative amount of sagebrush consumed. But<br />
again, it must be pointed out that competition<br />
between these native ungulate species is not in<br />
itself proof that something is wrong.<br />
Declines in big sagebrush in the BLA will<br />
reduce the area's potential as winter range for mule<br />
deer and pronghorn. Mehus (1995) concluded that<br />
"because big sagebrush is a critical cover and<br />
browse species for wintering ungulates in the study<br />
area [the northern range north of the park], habitat<br />
management should focus on protection of these<br />
habitat types. Fire negatively influences nonsprouting<br />
browse species like big sagebrush that<br />
are already declining under intense browsing<br />
pressure." Conversely, Clark (1991) looked at the<br />
effect of fire on seed germination and concluded<br />
that sagebrush seed germination was stimulated by<br />
temperatures of 122°F (50°C). Subsequent work<br />
has shown that sagebrush is re-establishing well on<br />
most of the areas burned in the 1988 fires (D.<br />
Despain, U.S. Geol. SUTY., pers. commun.).<br />
Houston (1982) noted that the BLA was a<br />
later addition to the park that had been heavily used<br />
by livestock from before the turn of the century<br />
until 1932. Houston (1982) and Singer and Renkin<br />
(1995) also suggested that at times the BLA has<br />
hosted unnatural and artificially high numbers of<br />
ungulates "due to animal avoidance of hunting<br />
outside the park" (Singer and Renkin 1995). The<br />
historical presence of livestock and the continued<br />
influences of hunting on animal movements must<br />
be considered when evaluating trends in sagebrush<br />
on the BLA. For example, Mehus (1995) attributed<br />
declines in sagebmsh on the BLA to high<br />
ungulate numbers and concluded that it will be<br />
necessary to reduce herbivore numbers "for browse<br />
species to persist even at their cuuently reduced<br />
abundance," but Houston (1982) interpreted the<br />
decline of big sagebrush in the BLA area as a<br />
return to more pristine conditions following the<br />
removal of livestock in the 1930s, because heavy<br />
livestock grazing promotes big sagebrush. Thus<br />
there is some question if the decline in sagebrush<br />
on the BLA is a departure from prehistoric conditions<br />
or an artifact of human activities in the area in<br />
the period of early white settlement.<br />
RESEARCH<br />
RECOMMENDATIONS:<br />
SAGEBRUSH<br />
Future research on sagebrush should focus<br />
primarily on the BLA. Continued high levels of<br />
human activity in and near the BLA, such as bison<br />
management operations at and near Stephens<br />
Creek, continued year-round pronghorn use in the<br />
BLA, and both livestock grazing and hunting just<br />
outside the park, can affect all native ungulates and<br />
their use of the BLA in the future. The reintroduction<br />
of wolves to <strong>Yellowstone</strong> National Park may<br />
affect prey species numbers (Singer 1991a), and