02.01.2014 Views

Yellowstone's Northern Range - Greater Yellowstone Science ...

Yellowstone's Northern Range - Greater Yellowstone Science ...

Yellowstone's Northern Range - Greater Yellowstone Science ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

WOODY VEGETATION<br />

45<br />

horn diet, 23 percent of the mule deer diet, 4<br />

percent of the elk diet, and 0.1 percent of the bison<br />

diet during the winters 1985-1988. But the<br />

declines were restricted mostly to the Wyoming<br />

subspecies, as well as to the mountain subspecies<br />

of big sagebrush; these declines occurred mostly on<br />

rolling upland topography. Sagebrush on lower<br />

slopes, swales, and drainages, which is mostly the<br />

basin subspecies, was as tall and vigorous as it was<br />

across most of the northern range. Thus, detailed<br />

study at three exclosures in the lower area and five<br />

exclosures in the upper area, as well as extensive<br />

foot and horseback reconnaissance of the rest of the<br />

northern range, indicates that big sagebrush is<br />

suppressed by ungulates and declining on about 3<br />

percent of the range in the park, and is either<br />

holding its own or increasing on the other 97<br />

percent.<br />

Mehus (1995) found that on the northern<br />

range outside the park, big sagebmsh was "the<br />

most significant item in mule deer diets, averaging<br />

33 percent of the diet across 9 sites." It is not<br />

possible to attribute this high level of winter use of<br />

sagebrush to the elk population; Mehus (1995)<br />

found that big sagebrush averaged 3 percent of the<br />

diets of elk in the same area, and winter use of<br />

sagebrush was equally high in the 1960s when elk<br />

and pronghorn were reduced to about 25 percent of<br />

their late-1980s numbers (Singer and Renkin<br />

1995). It should be noted that because elk are so<br />

much more abundant than pronghorn on the<br />

northern range, even very low consumption rates of<br />

sagebrush by individual elk could result in a large<br />

cumulative amount of sagebrush consumed. But<br />

again, it must be pointed out that competition<br />

between these native ungulate species is not in<br />

itself proof that something is wrong.<br />

Declines in big sagebrush in the BLA will<br />

reduce the area's potential as winter range for mule<br />

deer and pronghorn. Mehus (1995) concluded that<br />

"because big sagebrush is a critical cover and<br />

browse species for wintering ungulates in the study<br />

area [the northern range north of the park], habitat<br />

management should focus on protection of these<br />

habitat types. Fire negatively influences nonsprouting<br />

browse species like big sagebrush that<br />

are already declining under intense browsing<br />

pressure." Conversely, Clark (1991) looked at the<br />

effect of fire on seed germination and concluded<br />

that sagebrush seed germination was stimulated by<br />

temperatures of 122°F (50°C). Subsequent work<br />

has shown that sagebrush is re-establishing well on<br />

most of the areas burned in the 1988 fires (D.<br />

Despain, U.S. Geol. SUTY., pers. commun.).<br />

Houston (1982) noted that the BLA was a<br />

later addition to the park that had been heavily used<br />

by livestock from before the turn of the century<br />

until 1932. Houston (1982) and Singer and Renkin<br />

(1995) also suggested that at times the BLA has<br />

hosted unnatural and artificially high numbers of<br />

ungulates "due to animal avoidance of hunting<br />

outside the park" (Singer and Renkin 1995). The<br />

historical presence of livestock and the continued<br />

influences of hunting on animal movements must<br />

be considered when evaluating trends in sagebrush<br />

on the BLA. For example, Mehus (1995) attributed<br />

declines in sagebmsh on the BLA to high<br />

ungulate numbers and concluded that it will be<br />

necessary to reduce herbivore numbers "for browse<br />

species to persist even at their cuuently reduced<br />

abundance," but Houston (1982) interpreted the<br />

decline of big sagebrush in the BLA area as a<br />

return to more pristine conditions following the<br />

removal of livestock in the 1930s, because heavy<br />

livestock grazing promotes big sagebrush. Thus<br />

there is some question if the decline in sagebrush<br />

on the BLA is a departure from prehistoric conditions<br />

or an artifact of human activities in the area in<br />

the period of early white settlement.<br />

RESEARCH<br />

RECOMMENDATIONS:<br />

SAGEBRUSH<br />

Future research on sagebrush should focus<br />

primarily on the BLA. Continued high levels of<br />

human activity in and near the BLA, such as bison<br />

management operations at and near Stephens<br />

Creek, continued year-round pronghorn use in the<br />

BLA, and both livestock grazing and hunting just<br />

outside the park, can affect all native ungulates and<br />

their use of the BLA in the future. The reintroduction<br />

of wolves to <strong>Yellowstone</strong> National Park may<br />

affect prey species numbers (Singer 1991a), and

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!