02.01.2014 Views

Yellowstone's Northern Range - Greater Yellowstone Science ...

Yellowstone's Northern Range - Greater Yellowstone Science ...

Yellowstone's Northern Range - Greater Yellowstone Science ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

THE NORTHERN RANGE<br />

showed that grazing selected against some species<br />

and for others. For example, there was less rosy<br />

pussy toes (85 percent less) and fringed sage (33<br />

percent less) on some grazed sites, but there was a<br />

great deaI of site-by-site variation. On the other<br />

hand, another native forb, Arabis holboelii, was<br />

found on grazed plots but on no ungrazed plots.<br />

No consistent effects of grazing on forbs was<br />

revealed, as measured either by plant frequency or<br />

by plant basal cover. When plant frequency was<br />

measured, forbs were more often encountered on<br />

grazed sites in 8 of 14 comparisons, and less often<br />

encountered on grazed sites in 6 of 14 comparisons<br />

(Coughenour et al. 1995). Plant basal cover was<br />

less for forbs on grazed sites at the Blacktail and<br />

Lamar exclosures, but greater on grazed sites at the<br />

Gardiner exclosures (Reardon 1996).<br />

From the evidence collected to date, there<br />

was no consistent response of forbs to ungulate<br />

grazing on the northern range. Green forb biomass<br />

was reduced by grazing at some locations, years,<br />

and sites but the reverse of this was also commonly<br />

measured. Some of the annual variations observed<br />

may have been related to variations in precipitation.<br />

Coughenour et al. (1995) felt that "forbs<br />

responded positively to high spring rainfall and, in<br />

those years, forbs became increasingly competitive<br />

with grasses. While some reductions in forbs were<br />

observed, they were usually non- or marginallystatistically<br />

significant, not consistent between<br />

years, and no species of forb was being eliminated<br />

or reduced to a low level."<br />

SOILS<br />

No consistent trends were found in soil<br />

nitrates, soil organic matter, or soil nutrients<br />

between grazed and ungrazed sites (Lane 1990,<br />

Lane and Montagne 1996). Soil surface bulk<br />

densities were consistently higher on grazed sites<br />

(Lane 1990, Lane and Montagne 1996). High<br />

surface bulk densities may restrict movement of air<br />

and water through the soil; higher densities are'<br />

usuaIly the result of soil compaction. Some soil<br />

compaction is a logical consequence of the hoof<br />

action of ungulates on the soil surface. But several<br />

studies verified that soil moisture levels were not<br />

40<br />

affected by grazing (Lane 1990; Coughenour 1991;<br />

Merrill et aI. 1994a, 1996; Lane and Montagne<br />

1996; Singer and Harter 1996).<br />

For more on soils, see Chapter 5 .<br />

RESEARCH<br />

RECOMMENDATIONS:<br />

GRASSLANDS<br />

The area of greatest emphasis during the<br />

most recent research initiative concerned grazing<br />

effects on grasslands. While we now understand<br />

the grasslands better than the other components of<br />

the winter range, continuation of some aspects of<br />

grassland research is strongly recommended. First,<br />

a more intensive and consistent monitoring<br />

program for grassland production, grassland<br />

nutrient content, and climatic changes is needed.<br />

Second, the effects of the mechanisms of grazing<br />

on grasslands need to be better understood. For<br />

example, what factors contribute to the apparent<br />

stimulation of aboveground and belowground<br />

production and nutrient cycling by grazing? Third,<br />

fitness of some grasses may be enhanced by<br />

grazing, and this question should be pursued.<br />

Other important topics requiring further investigation<br />

include system functioning, the role of<br />

grasshoppers, nematodes and other invertebrate<br />

herbivores, and the role of small mammals such as<br />

pocket gophers in soil disturbance and plant<br />

succession (GruellI973, Houston 1982). Research<br />

is also needed to develop methods of restoring<br />

native grasses to areas now dominated by such<br />

non-native species as smooth brame, crested<br />

wheatgrass, timothy, and cheatgrass.<br />

CONCLUSIONS<br />

Houston (I982) wrote that, "the effects of<br />

herbivores upon the vegetation of the park require<br />

another look, because preoccupation with ungulates<br />

gives a distorted view of their herbivory in<br />

ecosystem dynamics." An important aspect of the<br />

studies conducted since Houston published that<br />

statement is their attention not only to ungulates<br />

but also to many other environmental factors.<br />

Rather than focus on the immediate effects of

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!