21.01.2014 Views

BRITISH CONSERVATISM AND THE PRIMROSE LEAGUE ... - ideals

BRITISH CONSERVATISM AND THE PRIMROSE LEAGUE ... - ideals

BRITISH CONSERVATISM AND THE PRIMROSE LEAGUE ... - ideals

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

30 <br />

marked most noticeably in the rising sectors of the middle class, the <br />

establishment of medallions by the Primrose League brought the process <br />

still further down the social scale and potentially within the reach of <br />

any enterprising individual.<br />

It enabled the buying of honors through <br />

relatively minimal sacrifice and income to persons wishing to emulate <br />

the social manners and traditions of those situated above them. With <br />

the increasing numbers of titled aristocracy joining another advantage <br />

was conferred: the perceived opportunity for social betterment and by <br />

implication, affiliation with one's social superiors. <br />

has been a revelation to me on the baser side of human nature. <br />

Lady Gwendolen Cecil, Life of Robert Marquis of Salisbury, vol. 3, p. <br />

142. <br />

By 1890 demand for honors had grown to such an extent that <br />

Salisbury characterized the decade as exhibiting an unparalleled "rage <br />

for distinction." Marsh, The Discipline of Popular Government, p. 192; <br />

citing Salisbury's comment to Sir Henry Ponsonby, 23 March 1890, Royal <br />

Archives L7/64. Two years later in drawing up an enhanced honors list <br />

following the Conservative party's defeat in the General Election, <br />

Salisbury grumbled to Lord John Manners, <br />

I think if Dante had known all we know, he would have <br />

created another inferno, worse than all the others, in <br />

which unhappy sinners should be condemned eternally to <br />

the task of distributing two honours among a hundred <br />

people so as to satisfy them all. <br />

Taylor, Lord Salisbury, p. 147. <br />

Salisbury complained bitterly of the task which befell him, <br />

managing whenever possible to relegate the burden to a few trusted <br />

subordinates. Nevertheless, he realized it was an essential part of <br />

oiling the party machinery. To this end, he took every conceivable <br />

opportunity, relying, not only on annual New Year's and Royal Birthday <br />

honors, but also on the 1887 and 1897 Royal Jubilee distinctions to <br />

reward party faithful, meritorious civil servants, and distinguished <br />

individuals in the arts and sciences. The political disbursements had <br />

increased to such an extent after 1895 that he himself commented <br />

extravagantly of "so many knights and baronets as to justify the saying <br />

you cannot throw a stone at a dog without hitting a knight in London." <br />

Marsh, The Discipline of Popular Government; citing J.M. Maclean, <br />

Recollections of Westminster and India (Manchester, 1902), p. 126.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!