08.02.2014 Views

Insurance Contracts CP - Law Reform Commission

Insurance Contracts CP - Law Reform Commission

Insurance Contracts CP - Law Reform Commission

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

(13) United Kingdom Developments on Basis of Contract Clauses<br />

5.36 Basis of the contract clauses were examined separately from warranty issues by the <strong>Law</strong><br />

<strong>Commission</strong> in the 1980 Report and the views and proposals expressed therein have been revisited by<br />

the <strong>Law</strong> <strong>Commission</strong>s in 2007 and 2009. In relation to warranties of past or present fact, the <strong>Law</strong><br />

<strong>Commission</strong> proposed, in 1980, 76 that where these are created by way of a proposal form, any statement<br />

of fact (e.g. a housebuilder warrants that his/her house is constructed of brick and slate) or a declaration<br />

that an answer given is true (e.g. proposer is 30 years of age) will be ineffective in creating a warranty. 77<br />

In the event that the insurer wishes to extract specific undertakings, the insurer should only be able to do<br />

so by way of terms contained in the policy itself, subject of course to the requirement that written notice of<br />

the warranties so incorporated are provided to the proposer as soon as practicable. 78<br />

5.37 In contrast, the use of basis of the contract clauses in relation to warranties as to the future, or<br />

promissory warranties, was not the subject of any specific recommendation because the mischiefs<br />

caused by basis of contract clauses relating to warranties of past or present fact were considered to be<br />

obvious whereas:<br />

―the safeguards and precautions which can be created by promissory warranties are clearly<br />

necessary for insurers and unobjectionable, and there appears to be no reason to prevent their<br />

creation by means of ―basis of the contract‖ clauses as a matter of convenience.‖ 79<br />

5.38 Insofar as a warranty created via a basis of contract clause related to existing and future<br />

conditions (eg the car is roadworthy and will be maintained in a roadworthy condition) the basis of<br />

contract clause would only be effective vis a vis the statement as to the future. Clearly the <strong>Law</strong><br />

<strong>Commission</strong> in 1980 saw the proposed formalities requirements as central to any effective method of<br />

dealing with abuse of contractual principles. 80<br />

5.39 This proposed restriction – basis of contract clauses will not be effective when used in a<br />

proposal form in order to create contractual warranties in relation to matters of past or present fact – was<br />

accompanied by two proposed substantive law adjustments. The <strong>Law</strong> <strong>Commission</strong> recommended that<br />

no matter of past or existing fact should be capable of constituting a warranty unless it related to a matter<br />

which is material to the risk. 81 The second recommendation was directed at counteracting basis of<br />

contract clauses that required the proposer to warrant the absolute accuracy of all or any of the answers<br />

given. The <strong>Law</strong> <strong>Commission</strong> referred back to the 1957 <strong>Law</strong> <strong>Reform</strong> Committee recommendation that,<br />

notwithstanding anything containing in a policy, no defence to a claim can arise from a misstatement<br />

where the insured can prove the statement was true to the best of his knowledge and belief. 82<br />

(14) Basis of Contract Clauses – The British 2007 Consultation Paper<br />

5.40 The <strong>Law</strong> <strong>Commission</strong>s, in the 2007 Consultation Paper were similarly critical of basis of<br />

contract clauses, describing them as ―an obscure legal device‖ allowing insurers to treat themselves as<br />

discharged from the contract ―if any statement is inaccurate‖. 83 Basis of Contract clauses were believed<br />

to be no longer in use as a result of the Industry Code, The Statement of General <strong>Insurance</strong> Practice, the<br />

Statement directing that such clauses should not be used in consumer insurance. The <strong>Law</strong> <strong>Commission</strong>s<br />

recommended that basis of contract clauses should have no effect in consumer insurance law. In relation<br />

to business insurance however, the <strong>Law</strong> <strong>Commission</strong>s were more equivocal. While remarking that, save<br />

in cases where a business proposer is professionally advised, most proposers will not appreciate the<br />

76<br />

77<br />

78<br />

79<br />

80<br />

81<br />

82<br />

83<br />

<strong>Law</strong> Com No.104.<br />

<strong>Law</strong> Com No.104, para. 7.8.<br />

<strong>Law</strong> Com No.104, para. 10.39.<br />

<strong>Law</strong> Com No.104, paras. 7.11 and 10.40.<br />

See para. 7.8.<br />

See paras. 6.2 and 7.7.<br />

See paras. 4.61 and 7.7.<br />

See para. 2.112 of the 2007 Consultation Paper.<br />

119

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!