Insurance Contracts CP - Law Reform Commission
Insurance Contracts CP - Law Reform Commission
Insurance Contracts CP - Law Reform Commission
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
(13) United Kingdom Developments on Basis of Contract Clauses<br />
5.36 Basis of the contract clauses were examined separately from warranty issues by the <strong>Law</strong><br />
<strong>Commission</strong> in the 1980 Report and the views and proposals expressed therein have been revisited by<br />
the <strong>Law</strong> <strong>Commission</strong>s in 2007 and 2009. In relation to warranties of past or present fact, the <strong>Law</strong><br />
<strong>Commission</strong> proposed, in 1980, 76 that where these are created by way of a proposal form, any statement<br />
of fact (e.g. a housebuilder warrants that his/her house is constructed of brick and slate) or a declaration<br />
that an answer given is true (e.g. proposer is 30 years of age) will be ineffective in creating a warranty. 77<br />
In the event that the insurer wishes to extract specific undertakings, the insurer should only be able to do<br />
so by way of terms contained in the policy itself, subject of course to the requirement that written notice of<br />
the warranties so incorporated are provided to the proposer as soon as practicable. 78<br />
5.37 In contrast, the use of basis of the contract clauses in relation to warranties as to the future, or<br />
promissory warranties, was not the subject of any specific recommendation because the mischiefs<br />
caused by basis of contract clauses relating to warranties of past or present fact were considered to be<br />
obvious whereas:<br />
―the safeguards and precautions which can be created by promissory warranties are clearly<br />
necessary for insurers and unobjectionable, and there appears to be no reason to prevent their<br />
creation by means of ―basis of the contract‖ clauses as a matter of convenience.‖ 79<br />
5.38 Insofar as a warranty created via a basis of contract clause related to existing and future<br />
conditions (eg the car is roadworthy and will be maintained in a roadworthy condition) the basis of<br />
contract clause would only be effective vis a vis the statement as to the future. Clearly the <strong>Law</strong><br />
<strong>Commission</strong> in 1980 saw the proposed formalities requirements as central to any effective method of<br />
dealing with abuse of contractual principles. 80<br />
5.39 This proposed restriction – basis of contract clauses will not be effective when used in a<br />
proposal form in order to create contractual warranties in relation to matters of past or present fact – was<br />
accompanied by two proposed substantive law adjustments. The <strong>Law</strong> <strong>Commission</strong> recommended that<br />
no matter of past or existing fact should be capable of constituting a warranty unless it related to a matter<br />
which is material to the risk. 81 The second recommendation was directed at counteracting basis of<br />
contract clauses that required the proposer to warrant the absolute accuracy of all or any of the answers<br />
given. The <strong>Law</strong> <strong>Commission</strong> referred back to the 1957 <strong>Law</strong> <strong>Reform</strong> Committee recommendation that,<br />
notwithstanding anything containing in a policy, no defence to a claim can arise from a misstatement<br />
where the insured can prove the statement was true to the best of his knowledge and belief. 82<br />
(14) Basis of Contract Clauses – The British 2007 Consultation Paper<br />
5.40 The <strong>Law</strong> <strong>Commission</strong>s, in the 2007 Consultation Paper were similarly critical of basis of<br />
contract clauses, describing them as ―an obscure legal device‖ allowing insurers to treat themselves as<br />
discharged from the contract ―if any statement is inaccurate‖. 83 Basis of Contract clauses were believed<br />
to be no longer in use as a result of the Industry Code, The Statement of General <strong>Insurance</strong> Practice, the<br />
Statement directing that such clauses should not be used in consumer insurance. The <strong>Law</strong> <strong>Commission</strong>s<br />
recommended that basis of contract clauses should have no effect in consumer insurance law. In relation<br />
to business insurance however, the <strong>Law</strong> <strong>Commission</strong>s were more equivocal. While remarking that, save<br />
in cases where a business proposer is professionally advised, most proposers will not appreciate the<br />
76<br />
77<br />
78<br />
79<br />
80<br />
81<br />
82<br />
83<br />
<strong>Law</strong> Com No.104.<br />
<strong>Law</strong> Com No.104, para. 7.8.<br />
<strong>Law</strong> Com No.104, para. 10.39.<br />
<strong>Law</strong> Com No.104, paras. 7.11 and 10.40.<br />
See para. 7.8.<br />
See paras. 6.2 and 7.7.<br />
See paras. 4.61 and 7.7.<br />
See para. 2.112 of the 2007 Consultation Paper.<br />
119