Insurance Contracts CP - Law Reform Commission
Insurance Contracts CP - Law Reform Commission
Insurance Contracts CP - Law Reform Commission
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
has been the Consumer Protection Code 2012, 14 which sets out enforceable standards for financial<br />
services contracts, including insurance contracts, and which in many respects amount to a statutory<br />
statement of key contractual obligations. Along with these statutory innovations, voluntary Codes of<br />
Practice have also been developed by representative bodies suich as the Irish <strong>Insurance</strong> Federation (IIF),<br />
and the <strong>Commission</strong> considers that these have further potential.<br />
10. The establishment, in parallel, of the FSO has had equally signficant effects, because the FSO<br />
has considerable decision-making powers to resolve consumer disputes as well as those involving small<br />
and medium sized undertakings (SMEs). The establishment of the FSO indicated the need for a<br />
decision-making process to resolve disputes that would be less expensive than litigation. The FSO has<br />
the additional advantage that the Office can engage in mediation of disputes and, even when engaged in<br />
decision-making, can make determinations that depart from the precise requirements of the principles<br />
and rules of individual insurance contact law. This statutory discretion appears to reflect the view that<br />
these principles and rules may not reflect an appropriate calibration between the respective obligations<br />
and rights of the insured and the insurer. The <strong>Commission</strong> notes, nonetheless, that the published<br />
decisions of the FSO indicate that, in many instances, the existing principles and rules have played a<br />
significant part in these processes.<br />
I<br />
The development of Principles of European <strong>Insurance</strong> Contract <strong>Law</strong> (PEICL)<br />
11. Another significant influence, certainly in terms of individual insurance contract law, has been the<br />
publication of the Principles of European <strong>Insurance</strong> Contract <strong>Law</strong> (PEICL), the outcome of a collaborative<br />
project between leading European experts in this area. The publication of PEICL mirrors comparable<br />
projects in other jurisdictions to set out key principles of the law, such as the Restatements of <strong>Law</strong><br />
published by the American <strong>Law</strong> Institute (ALI). It remains to be seen whether the PEICL will have<br />
anything like the same influence on the development of law in EU member states as the ALI<br />
Restatements have had in the United States. In any event, from the <strong>Commission</strong>‘s perspective, the<br />
publication of PEICL provides another reference point for this current review of insurance contract law.<br />
J<br />
The <strong>Commission</strong>’s General Approach in this Consultation Paper<br />
12. The <strong>Commission</strong> considers that a review of insurance contract law in the early 21 st century<br />
should have regard to all these developments. This allows the <strong>Commission</strong> to consider afresh longestablished<br />
principles and rules in this area, in particular those based on principles of private autonomy<br />
and which were developed before the advent of statutory regulation. The regulatory landscape,<br />
evidenced by the Consumer Protection Code 2012, has a much more interventionist character in relation<br />
to contractual practices than was previously the case, or perhaps is even generally appreciated.<br />
Furthermore, the advent of the FSO has produced a body of norms and standards that indicate the need<br />
for a fundamental reappraisal of Irish insurance contract law.<br />
13. In approaching this Consultation Paper, therefore, the <strong>Commission</strong> considers that while existing<br />
common law principles and rules may be in some need of recalibrtation, a number of underlying key<br />
elements remain valid. The <strong>Commission</strong> is conscious that the existing law in this area includes longestablished<br />
common law principles whose origins coincide with the still-extant Life Assurance Act 1774.<br />
It is equally conscious that the more recent case law in this area, and the recent legislation that<br />
established the Financial Regulator and the FSO, provide an important contemporary background against<br />
which propsoals for reform need to be considered. The <strong>Commission</strong> is also conscious that any proposals<br />
14<br />
The Consumer Protection Code 2012 (which was published in October 2011 after a significant public<br />
consultation process and is in force from 1 January 2012) is more detailed than the previous Consumer<br />
Protection Code published in 2006. This reflects the more robust ―principles and rules‖ approach to regulation<br />
mentioned in the previous footnote. The Code was issued under the following statutory powers: (a) section<br />
117 of the Central Bank Act 1989; (b) sections 23 and 37 of the Investment Intermediaries Act 1995; (c)<br />
section 8H of the Consumer Credit Act 1995; and (d) section 61 of the <strong>Insurance</strong> Act 1989. The Consumer<br />
Protection Code 2012 is available at http://www.centralbank.ie/regulation/processes/consumer-protectioncode/Documents/Consumer%20Protection%20Code%202012.pdf.<br />
4