Insurance Contracts CP - Law Reform Commission
Insurance Contracts CP - Law Reform Commission
Insurance Contracts CP - Law Reform Commission
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
7<br />
CHAPTER 7<br />
FORMALITIES<br />
A<br />
Introduction.<br />
7.01 Irish law does not provide a coherent set of rules requiring an insurance contract to be<br />
negotiated or concluded in tandem with the creation of a written or electronic record of the transaction. A<br />
fragmented body of EU legislation has built up in relation to consumer insurance but the absence of any<br />
general requirement on pre-contractual information being furnished to a proposer, or the recording of<br />
essential terms of the agreement, as well as any requirement to actually furnish the insured with a copy of<br />
the policy (or key terms such as promissory warranties) are shortcomings in the law that need to be<br />
addressed. The <strong>Commission</strong> is aware of the need to allow flexible contractual practices to operate and<br />
the desirability of keeping transaction costs to a minimum, but these objectives should not be purchased<br />
at the cost of lack of clarity and procedural or substantive fairness.<br />
B<br />
Legislation, Case <strong>Law</strong> and Codes of Practice<br />
7.02 Isolated examples of legislative provisions which seek to promote greater clarity of purpose<br />
and legal certainty between a proposer and an insurer do exist. The <strong>Insurance</strong> Act 1936 in relation to<br />
industrial assurance 1 provides exceptions that prove the rule. While the <strong>Insurance</strong> Act 1989 contained an<br />
enabling provision 2 that would have had a significant impact on pre-contractual negotiations and notice<br />
requirements in respect of the duty of disclosure and warranties, this power was never exercised.<br />
(1) Limited legislative provisions<br />
7.03 The Road Traffic Acts make it necessary for vehicle insurers who issue approved policies on<br />
insurance to issue certificates of insurance in the prescribed form, 3 an understandable provision in<br />
relation to compulsory insurance. Some isolated examples of formal requirements have been identified in<br />
industrial assurances relating to endowment policies, eg funeral expenses, but not only have such<br />
instances been repealed. 4 It appears that in historical terms the interest of Parliament and the Óireachtas<br />
in ensuring that contracts of insurance are evidenced in writing owe much to a desire to create<br />
appropriate targets for stamp duties and levies. 5 Section 22 of the Marine <strong>Insurance</strong> Act 1906 requires<br />
every contract for marine insurance to be expressed in a policy, the policy being capable of being<br />
executed or issued either at the time of the contract or otherwise. Non-compliance renders the contract<br />
of marine insurance inadmissible in evidence. As was shown in Chapter 2, in relation to the insurable<br />
interest requirement, the Life Assurance Act 1774, as extended into Ireland, requires policies of life<br />
insurance to be in writing with the name of the beneficiary on it. This is not however a ―consumer<br />
protection‖ measure – quite the reverse. Lack of clarity and certainty is also not provided via section 2 of<br />
the Statute of Frauds, 1695. The provision in section 2 of the Statute of Frauds, which directs that a<br />
memorandum is necessary in respect of an agreement that is not to be performed within one year from<br />
the making of the agreement has been held to be fully performed on one side by the payment of the<br />
1<br />
2<br />
3<br />
4<br />
5<br />
Eg. s.61 (contents of proposals to contain some specific terms) and 63 (ministerial power to delete or amend<br />
proposal terms)<br />
s.61.<br />
Road Traffic Act 1961 s.66, and SI 14 of 1962, as amended.<br />
Eg Assurance Companies Act 1909, repealed by section 7(2) of the <strong>Insurance</strong> Act 1936.<br />
Existing revenue practice is to raise the levy against premiums: see for example section 26 of the Finance Act<br />
2009.<br />
151