08.02.2014 Views

Insurance Contracts CP - Law Reform Commission

Insurance Contracts CP - Law Reform Commission

Insurance Contracts CP - Law Reform Commission

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

uberrima fidei, regulatory requirements under Irish financial services regulation, and best practice<br />

requirements as they have developed with the Irish <strong>Insurance</strong> industry.<br />

(2) <strong>Reform</strong> Proposals in the United Kingdom – support for legislative changes<br />

1.59 While the issue of insurance contract law reform has been under review in the United Kingdom<br />

since 1954, it is a remarkable fact that until 2011 no Bill had been presented to Parliament by any<br />

Government. The <strong>Law</strong> <strong>Reform</strong> Committee, following its appointment in 1954, expressed a general view<br />

that legislative intervention to improve the position of insureds constituted an interference with freedom of<br />

contract but the Committee still felt able to recommend that the duty of disclosure should be adjusted to<br />

replace the prudent insurer test of materiality with a reasonable insured test. The Committee also<br />

suggested that warranties of fact should not be allowed to be effective when a proposer was able to show<br />

that any misstatement made was true to the best of his knowledge and belief. When the <strong>Law</strong><br />

<strong>Commission</strong> of England and Wales revisited these matters in 1980 the arguments by the insurance<br />

industry favouring self regulation via statements of practice were swept aside on the ground that the duty<br />

of disclosure was unfair and that statements of practice lack the force of law. ―Basis of contract‖ clauses<br />

and warranties of fact set out in proposal forms were also the subject of recommendations that would<br />

have reduced the insurer‘s rights to avoid policies. It is particularly interesting to note that in its 1980<br />

Report the <strong>Law</strong> <strong>Commission</strong> specifically rejected the arguments that any reforms should be limited to<br />

consumer insurance.<br />

1.60 In the period between January 2006 and December 2009, the <strong>Law</strong> <strong>Commission</strong>s of England<br />

and Wales, and of Scotland, have issued a number of documents, a scoping paper, Issues Papers, and a<br />

Consultation Paper with summaries of responses thereto, and, most recently, a final report and draft bill.<br />

These documents have ultimately led the <strong>Law</strong> <strong>Commission</strong>s to reformulate both their agenda and reform<br />

timetable and several of their initial legislative proposals. In particular, the Final Report sets out a rather<br />

modest number of measures that are confined to the consumer insurance duty of disclosure, remedies for<br />

misrepresentation and basis of contract clauses. Nevertheless, the <strong>Law</strong> <strong>Commission</strong>s have remained<br />

consistent in arguing for legislative reform of insurance contract law on the basis that:<br />

the law should be brought into line with both the Financial Ombudsman Service decisions and<br />

industry practice which requires an insurer to have asked clear questions before the insurer may<br />

avoid a policy for non-disclosure; indeed the <strong>Law</strong> <strong>Commission</strong>s go so far as to recommend the<br />

abolition of the residual duty of disclosure in consumer insurance;<br />

codification of best practice would simplify the law and improve consumer confidence in the<br />

insurance industry<br />

reform should also seek to align the position of small businesses with the reform proposals<br />

outlined in relation to consumer insurance;<br />

proposed reforms should include revision of the right of an insurer to avoid policies on the basis<br />

of misrepresentation and breach of warranty, with an insurer‘s rights of avoidance being replaced<br />

in certain instances by financial remedies;<br />

in cases of fraud however, the position of an insurer should remain as it currently is.<br />

1.61 In 2011, the UK Government introduced into the House of Lords the Consumer <strong>Insurance</strong><br />

(Disclosure and Representations) Bill 2011. This Bill is to be processed by reference to the speedy<br />

procedures available in respect of non controversial Bills that involve implementation of <strong>Law</strong> <strong>Commission</strong><br />

proposals. The Bill is the first legislative text to emerge from a detailed and schematic set of insurance<br />

contract law topics that have been the subject of issues papers and consultations. These include subjects<br />

relating in particular to sections 22 and 53 of the Marine <strong>Insurance</strong> Act 1906 as well as general topics<br />

such as insurable interest, the insured‘s post-contract duty of good faith, damages for late payment and<br />

warranties. 87 In this Consultation Paper the <strong>Commission</strong> seeks to provide a set of reform proposals that<br />

will cover many of the topics that have occupied the English and Scottish <strong>Law</strong> <strong>Commission</strong>s.<br />

87<br />

At the time of writing (November 2011), the Committee Stage in the House of Lords had been held on 19<br />

October 2011, and the Report Stage in the House of Lords was scheduled for 20 December 2011.<br />

26

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!