Insurance Contracts CP - Law Reform Commission
Insurance Contracts CP - Law Reform Commission
Insurance Contracts CP - Law Reform Commission
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
2005 Final Report and Recommendations, Competition Issues in the Non-Life <strong>Insurance</strong> Market. After<br />
investigating motor insurance, employer‘s liability insurance and public liability insurance, the Competition<br />
Authority made a number of recommendations aimed at improving competitiveness within each sector.<br />
Some recommendations involved providing proposers and insureds with contractual rights to a statement<br />
on claims history, timely and detailed renewal notices so as to facilitate switching to competitors; other<br />
recommendations such as a requirement that intermediary fees should be disclosed to insureds have<br />
been subsequently diluted so as to avoid ―consumer information overload.‖ The Competition Authority, in<br />
its 2009 Annual Report, noted that the Financial Regulator requires such disclosure of intermediary fees if<br />
the consumer makes a request for such information. The Competition Authority clearly has an important<br />
role to play in improving the rights of Irish consumers by promoting competition and making<br />
recommendations to the Financial Regulator. Other State agencies are also expected to respond to the<br />
views expressed by the Competition Authority. 3<br />
(3) Regulatory Overlaps - Equality Legislation<br />
1.05 The provisions of the the Employment Equality Acts 1998 and 2004 and the Equal Status Acts<br />
2000 and 2004 clearly have an impact upon the <strong>Insurance</strong> Industry. Both pieces of legislation prohibit<br />
discrimination based upon<br />
gender<br />
marital status<br />
family status<br />
sexual orientation<br />
religion<br />
age<br />
disability<br />
race<br />
membership of the traveller community status.<br />
1.06 While most of the complaints made to the Equality Authority relate to discrimination in the<br />
provision of public sector services, and in particular discrimination based on race, gender and traveller<br />
status, there are pertinent examples involving insurance.<br />
1.07 For example, Brother Anthony White 4 was able to use the services of the Equality Authority to<br />
challenge a practice of loading a surcharge onto the cost of hiring a motor vehicle because the driver was<br />
aged over 70, no account being taken of the individual circumstance of the driver. The service provider<br />
agreed to withdraw this automatic loading. The then chief executive of the Authority was quoted on the<br />
Authority‘s website as remarking:<br />
―the use of lower and upper age limits to govern access to insurance products and financial and<br />
other services is a widespread problem. Age limits exclude people without any consideration of<br />
their individual circumstances‖<br />
1.08 There are decisions of Equality Officers that also address disability issues. In Mr A v A Life<br />
Assurance Company 5 the Equality Officer found that a refusal to top up an income protection policy for an<br />
insured with diabetes was a prima facie case of disability discrimination. The insurer however was able to<br />
3<br />
4<br />
5<br />
For example, the 2007 Report on Private Health <strong>Insurance</strong> contained recommendations that the Competition<br />
Authority said had been either fully implemented or written into draft legislation: 2009 Annual Report, p.48.<br />
www.equalitytribunal.ie. See also, ―Pensioners in Search of Travel <strong>Insurance</strong>,‖ The Irish Times, 2 May 2011.<br />
Equality Decision DEC-S2011.008 (18 February 2011). See also, O‟Donoghue v Hibernian General <strong>Insurance</strong><br />
(2004) and Ross v Royal Sun Alliance (2003) cited in Mr A v A Life Assurance Company. See generally<br />
Smith, Disability Discrimination <strong>Law</strong> (Thomson Reuters, 2010).<br />
10