08.02.2014 Views

Insurance Contracts CP - Law Reform Commission

Insurance Contracts CP - Law Reform Commission

Insurance Contracts CP - Law Reform Commission

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

(6) Defining <strong>Insurance</strong> <strong>Contracts</strong> in Irish <strong>Law</strong><br />

2.109 The leading Irish decision is International Commercial Bank plc v <strong>Insurance</strong> Corporation of<br />

Ireland plc. 187 The case concerned a credit guarantee insurance agreement whereby ICI provided an<br />

indemnity if (as happened) a company that borrowed monies from the plaintiff bank defaulted on the loan.<br />

ICI resisted the claim on the grounds that the contract was one of credit insurance and as such caught by<br />

uberrimae fidei. Failure by the bank to disclose certain material facts gave ICI, the defendant, a right to<br />

avoid the policy. Blayney J, following Seaton v Heath 188 found the contract was one of guarantee, not<br />

insurance. Blayney J, looked at the question by reference to the substance of the case. In Seaton v<br />

Heath Romer LJ had said:<br />

―<strong>Contracts</strong> of insurance are generally matters of speculation where the person desiring to be<br />

insured has means of knowledge as to the risk, and the insurer has not the means or not the<br />

same means. The insured generally puts the risk before the insurer as a business transaction,<br />

and the insurer on the risk stated fixes a proper price to remunerate him for the risk to be<br />

undertaken; and the insurer engages to pay the loss incurred by the insured in the event of<br />

certain specified contingencies occurring. On the other hand, in general, contracts of<br />

guarantee are between persons who occupy, or ultimately assume, the positions or creditor,<br />

debtor, and surety, and thereby the surety becomes bound to pay the debt or make good the<br />

default of the debtor. In general, the creditor does not himself go to the surety, or represent, or<br />

explain to the surety, the risk to be run. The surety often takes the position from motives of<br />

friendship to the debtor, and generally not as the result of any direct bargaining between him<br />

and the creditor, or in consideration of any remuneration passing to him from the creditor. The<br />

risk undertaken is generally known to the surety, and the circumstances generally point to the<br />

view that as between the creditor and surety it was contemplated and intended that the surety<br />

should take upon himself to ascertain exactly what risk he was taking upon himself. 189<br />

2.110 In an article on the legal nature of credit default swaps, 190 Smith argues that by focusing on the<br />

substance of credit default swaps, that is, that the payment obligation under a credit derivative is not<br />

conditional on the payee‘s loss, 191 it is possible to avoid both the conclusion that a credit default swap is<br />

not indemnity insurance and the rather inconvenient result that uberrimae fidei duties attach thereto. The<br />

<strong>Commission</strong> has been advised that these issues of form and substance, unsatisfactory as they are, are<br />

approached in an identical manner in Ireland, that is, precise definition and classifications are eschewed.<br />

In any event, this point is of much less importance in Ireland because the Life Assurance Act 1774, a<br />

source of some mischief in this context in the United Kingdom 192 is confined to life policies in this<br />

jurisdiction.<br />

(7) The insurance/gaming divide – current review of gambling legislation<br />

2.111 The Department of Justice and Equality is currently (November 2011) engaged in a major<br />

review of Irish gambling law, currently regulated by the Gaming and Lotteries Act 1956, with a view to<br />

developing ―a new and comprehensive legal and organisational framework governing the gambling<br />

architecture in the State.‖ 193 Building on the Report of the Casino Committee Report, Regulation Gaming<br />

in Ireland 194 the then Minister announced that one of the premises that most modern gambling codes are<br />

187<br />

188<br />

189<br />

190<br />

191<br />

192<br />

193<br />

194<br />

[1991] ILRM 726.<br />

[1899] 1QB 782.<br />

At p.792-3.<br />

Smith, ―The Legal Nature of Credit Default Swaps‖ [2010] LMCLQ386 at 409.<br />

The so called Post Option: see generally Castignini, Derivatives: The Key Principles 3rd ed (Oxford University<br />

Press 2009).<br />

Smith, ―The Legal Nature of Credit Default Swaps‖ [2010] LMCLQ 386 at 409.<br />

Response of the Minister for Justice to a Parliamentary Question, October 7, 2010.<br />

Available at www.justice.ie.<br />

60

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!