- Page 1 and 2: CONSULTATION PAPER INSURANCE CONTRA
- Page 3 and 4: MEMBERSHIP The Law Reform Commissio
- Page 5 and 6: ADMINISTRATION STAFF Head of Admini
- Page 7: ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Commission wou
- Page 11 and 12: CHAPTER 4 (3) Factors covered by an
- Page 13 and 14: (10)Enforcement 149 CHAPTER 7 FORMA
- Page 15: TABLE OF KEY LEGISLATION Assurance
- Page 18 and 19: Pg No. Economides v Commercial Unio
- Page 20 and 21: Ireland Ltd Pg No. Roselodge Ltd v
- Page 22 and 23: D Regulation and Supervision of Ins
- Page 24 and 25: has been the Consumer Protection Co
- Page 26 and 27: this definition would apply both to
- Page 28 and 29: Commission provisionally recommends
- Page 30 and 31: 2005 Final Report and Recommendatio
- Page 32 and 33: in Coleman accords with data protec
- Page 34 and 35: functions may in the future be merg
- Page 36 and 37: estrictions on the ability of the O
- Page 38 and 39: (2) Adverse comments on the propose
- Page 40 and 41: harmonisation of insurance contract
- Page 42 and 43: 1.49 Before leaving the general iss
- Page 44 and 45: (2) Decisions of the Financial Serv
- Page 46 and 47: uberrima fidei, regulatory requirem
- Page 48 and 49: 1.68 The Commission provisionally r
- Page 50 and 51: 2.03 In contrast, a non-indemnity
- Page 52 and 53: CJ expressed the view that it made
- Page 54 and 55: 2.18 In the House of Lords, Lord El
- Page 56 and 57: Lord Eldon formulation, 45 overrule
- Page 58 and 59:
interest in respect of the property
- Page 60 and 61:
drawings themselves, Auld LJ and Si
- Page 62 and 63:
the judges to complicate the law by
- Page 64 and 65:
Insurance in the UK, Ireland and EU
- Page 66 and 67:
any existing doubt, or prevailing m
- Page 68 and 69:
(2) A potential financial loss reco
- Page 70 and 71:
to the extent of monies actually ex
- Page 72 and 73:
took out a life insurance policy on
- Page 74 and 75:
2.86 The Commission invites submiss
- Page 76 and 77:
and social provision be integrated
- Page 78 and 79:
and deny enforceability. The leadin
- Page 80 and 81:
(6) Defining Insurance Contracts in
- Page 83 and 84:
3 CHAPTER 3 DUTY OF DISCLOSURE A In
- Page 85 and 86:
the Ohio case of Hartford Protectio
- Page 87 and 88:
the basis that the insurance contra
- Page 89 and 90:
that which the signatory could reas
- Page 91 and 92:
―(i) In order to be entitled to a
- Page 93 and 94:
withholding information on the basi
- Page 95 and 96:
public interest in running blockade
- Page 97 and 98:
In Manor Park, McMahon J. took a si
- Page 99 and 100:
at the precontractual stage. The de
- Page 101 and 102:
decisions in which the Ombudsman ha
- Page 103 and 104:
(8) The English Law Commission’s
- Page 105 and 106:
(10) Australia 3.88 In ALRC Report
- Page 107 and 108:
Article 3:103 Exceptions The sancti
- Page 109:
it is desirable to retain the duty;
- Page 112 and 113:
B Judicial approaches to limiting a
- Page 114 and 115:
will no doubt arise in the future.
- Page 116 and 117:
questions that are incapable of a y
- Page 118 and 119:
(1) Marine Insurance Act 1906 and m
- Page 120 and 121:
(3) Should the right to rescind be
- Page 122 and 123:
y English judges to any extent, and
- Page 124 and 125:
non-disclosure or misrepresentation
- Page 126 and 127:
Factually incorrect answers to a qu
- Page 128 and 129:
4.68 While the English and Scottish
- Page 130 and 131:
terms to be construed by reference
- Page 132 and 133:
conclusion, ―with considerable re
- Page 134 and 135:
the present was held not to be prom
- Page 136 and 137:
(10) Limiting the scope of the warr
- Page 138 and 139:
have been forthright in suggesting
- Page 140 and 141:
nature and potentially draconian na
- Page 142 and 143:
(b) that even though the loss was o
- Page 144 and 145:
whichever is the earlier event. 103
- Page 146 and 147:
5.67 Nevertheless, the law reports
- Page 148 and 149:
may properly consider to be relevan
- Page 150 and 151:
―It is easy to sympathise with th
- Page 152 and 153:
decisions, and case-law, that preve
- Page 154 and 155:
the terms of the insurance contract
- Page 156 and 157:
householder each assuming the other
- Page 158 and 159:
whether in all the circumstances it
- Page 160 and 161:
may be regarded as technical or unm
- Page 162 and 163:
―Basis of contract clauses would
- Page 164 and 165:
The court may be influenced by the
- Page 166 and 167:
―consumer‘s reasonable expectat
- Page 168 and 169:
of the term, particularly in the co
- Page 170 and 171:
National Consumer Agency would be t
- Page 172 and 173:
premium, thus taking the contract o
- Page 174 and 175:
the Provider could not provide the
- Page 176 and 177:
exceptions to these requirements in
- Page 178 and 179:
(l) the existence of guarantee fund
- Page 180 and 181:
policy should be issued within fift
- Page 182 and 183:
contains interesting and helpful ad
- Page 184 and 185:
in the Aro Road case who wrote that
- Page 186 and 187:
8.11 The most visible demonstration
- Page 188 and 189:
common law position relating to sep
- Page 190 and 191:
F Effects of fraud 8.27 Once the fr
- Page 192 and 193:
8.36 In the case of composite insur
- Page 194 and 195:
(i) consented to the act or omissio
- Page 196 and 197:
Insurance Corporation of the Channe
- Page 198 and 199:
not only an economic purpose, but a
- Page 200 and 201:
Article 6:104 Time of Performance (
- Page 202 and 203:
B The Problem in Context 9.04 The d
- Page 204 and 205:
D Exceptions to the Privity Rule (1
- Page 206 and 207:
9.20 Because Ireland has not adopte
- Page 208 and 209:
cover but the defendants failed to
- Page 210 and 211:
(1) ―Where a person who is not pa
- Page 212 and 213:
9.46 The privity doctrine confines
- Page 215 and 216:
CHAPTER 10 REMEDIES A Introduction
- Page 217 and 218:
(4) Where the risk would have been
- Page 219 and 220:
isks‖ policy provided by Royal an
- Page 221 and 222:
elation to negligent misrepresentat
- Page 223 and 224:
insurer is seeking to avoid the con
- Page 225 and 226:
10.38 The decision of Hirst J in Th
- Page 227 and 228:
10.48 The Ontario Court of Appeal,
- Page 229 and 230:
(a) An insurer cancelled a motor in
- Page 231 and 232:
G Subrogation - Public Policy Excep
- Page 233 and 234:
(ii) Subrogation - Employee Liabili
- Page 235 and 236:
Employee‟s Liability (Indemnifica
- Page 237 and 238:
―an employer should be liable to
- Page 239:
Street Dublin against the embezzlem
- Page 242 and 243:
11.09 The Commission invites submis
- Page 244 and 245:
of a promissory warranty, it should