08.02.2014 Views

Insurance Contracts CP - Law Reform Commission

Insurance Contracts CP - Law Reform Commission

Insurance Contracts CP - Law Reform Commission

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

the terms of the insurance contracts in advance, so that policyholders have no opportunity to negotiate<br />

the terms.‖ 147<br />

5.91 The <strong>Commission</strong> considers such a proposition to be a rather sweeping generalisation. Large<br />

companies seeking insurance cover are not to be equated with consumer proposers. Large companies<br />

may often be expected to have specialist departments that will contain the expertise necessary to shop<br />

around and secure cost effective insurance. Large companies should be fixed with actual if not<br />

constructive knowledge of what terms, exclusions and warranties mean and what legal effects follow<br />

therefrom. Large companies may often be expected to engage brokers through whom insurance cover<br />

can be obtained. In circumstances of this kind the <strong>Commission</strong> sees no need to introduce a level of<br />

Judicial Review, or a measure that unduly interferes with Freedom of Contract. Abusive clauses that are<br />

covertly tucked away in proposal forms or which appear, perhaps belatedly, in policy documents will in<br />

any case be the subject of close judicial scrutiny via requirements of good faith and a reasonable<br />

expectations standard. It appears that this requirement may be increasingly a standard that will be<br />

imposed in commercial insurance contracts. 148 The <strong>Commission</strong> also considers that the problem of<br />

abuse of freedom of contract is one that traverses the entire range of commercial contracts. Irish law,<br />

unfortunately, has not sought to address this phenomena in the way that the United Kingdom Parliament<br />

has done (eg, see the non-negotiated standard terms provisions in section 3 of the Unfair Contract Terms<br />

Act 1977). Other legislative models include the Australian Commonwealth Trade Practices Acts 149 and<br />

some specific statutory provisions that may operated on unfair terms; 150 the <strong>Commission</strong> does not think it<br />

is treading on an area of sensitivity when it observes that a broader review of unfair contractual practices<br />

in business to business contracts in Ireland is overdue. However, the <strong>Commission</strong> believes that the<br />

problems that arise in commercial insurance do not necessarily require a sweeping legislative measure.<br />

The <strong>Commission</strong> believes that specific legislation, confined to the insurance sector in relation to possible<br />

abusive terms in all commercial insurance contracts would be premature.<br />

5.92 However, it is clear that some commercial insurance cover is affected in circumstances where<br />

the insurer may seek to avoid honouring a policy on technical and unmeritorious grounds. The facts of<br />

Manor Park Homebuilders Ltd v AIG Europe (Ireland) Ltd 151 provide such an illustration although<br />

McMahon J found for the insured. The decision in the English case US Trading Ltd v Axa <strong>Insurance</strong> Co<br />

Ltd 152 also points up a judicial willingness to impose appropriate standards of notice to proposers and<br />

insureds. The <strong>Commission</strong> believes that small business insureds do require some protection from<br />

abusive clauses, particularly disclaimers and warranties that have not been individually negotiated. The<br />

<strong>Commission</strong> views two possible responses as being worthy of consideration.<br />

5.93 Because the <strong>Commission</strong> believes that small business insureds require protection while at the<br />

same time considering that all business insureds should not be treated in the same way as consumers, a<br />

via media in relation to Article 2:304 could be adopted. Under the existing legislation relating to dispute<br />

settlement jurisdiction of the Financial Services Ombudsman, business to business insurance contracts<br />

(where a corporate insured has a turnover of €3 million or less in the year of the complaint being made)<br />

may refer complaints to the Financial Services Ombudsman. 153 The <strong>Commission</strong> considers it appropriate<br />

that the ordinary courts should also be able to apply what is after all a modified example of the EU<br />

147<br />

148<br />

149<br />

150<br />

151<br />

152<br />

153<br />

Principles of European <strong>Insurance</strong> Contract <strong>Law</strong>, p.116.<br />

Eg US Trading Ltd v Axa <strong>Insurance</strong> Co Ltd [2010] Lloyds Rep IR 505.<br />

Specifically the Trade Practices Act 1974, s.52 and s.53.<br />

Eg the New Zealand Contractual Remedies Act 1979 (eg s.4 on entire agreement clauses). The 2010 South<br />

African Consumer <strong>Contracts</strong> legislation against unfair terms can also be invoked by small business<br />

enterprises.<br />

[2009] 1 ILRM 190.<br />

[2010] Lloyd‘s Rep IR 505.<br />

S.I. No. 190 of 2005. For unincorporated groups of persons – clubs, charities and trust – there is no effective<br />

turnover limit.<br />

134

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!