Insurance Contracts CP - Law Reform Commission
Insurance Contracts CP - Law Reform Commission
Insurance Contracts CP - Law Reform Commission
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
of a promissory warranty, it should be reviewed in terms of whether it is an unfair term within the meaning<br />
of the European Communities (Unfair Terms in Consumer <strong>Contracts</strong>) Regulations 1995. [Paragraph 5.98]<br />
Chapter 6 – Exclusions and Unfair Terms<br />
11.29 The <strong>Commission</strong> provisionally recommends that legislation be enacted to provide that an<br />
insurance contract should be subject to a good faith requirement, namely that if reliance on a term in an<br />
insurance contract would constitute a failure to act with the utmost good faith the party may not rely on<br />
that term. [Paragraph 6.08]<br />
11.30 The <strong>Commission</strong> provisionally recommends that there should be a statutory duty on an insurer<br />
to draw attention to unusual terms. [Paragraph 6.10]<br />
11.31 The <strong>Commission</strong> provisionally recommends that Regulation 4 of the European Communities<br />
(Unfair Terms in Consumer <strong>Contracts</strong>) Regulations 1995 (which deals with specific circumstances in<br />
which a contract term shall not of itself be considered to be unfair) should be clarified in the context of<br />
insurance contracts so that it is provided, to avoid any doubt, that: (a) a term in an insurance contract<br />
shall not in itself be regarded as unfair where the subject matter of the term has actually been considered<br />
by the insurer in the calculation of the premium (price); (b) that this has been drawn to the attention of the<br />
proposer; and (c) that this clarification to Regulation 4 should apply to consumers as defined for the<br />
purposes of the jurisdiction of the Financial Services Ombudsman, namely natural persons and<br />
businesses with an annual turnover not exceeding €3 million. [Paragraph 6.46]<br />
Chapter 7 – Formalities<br />
11.32 The <strong>Commission</strong> provisionally recommends that legislation should provide that it is not a<br />
necessary pre-condition to the validity of an insurance contract that it be in writing. The contract may be<br />
proved by any means, including oral testimony. [Paragraph 7.40]<br />
11.33 The <strong>Commission</strong> provisionally recommends that, subject to a cooling-off period (if any), the<br />
insurer should transmit the insurance policy document to the insured within 15 working days of the<br />
contract being agreed. [Paragraph 7.43]<br />
11.34 The <strong>Commission</strong> provisionally recommends that legislation should provide that insurance<br />
contracts be subject to prescribed requirements of notices, notification and forms that are comparable to<br />
those already found in existing consumer protection legislation, such as the European Communities<br />
(Distance Marketing of Consumer Financial Services) Regulations 2004. The <strong>Commission</strong> also<br />
provisionally recommends that legislation should include a statutory duty on insurers to provide a<br />
proposer with the prescribed requirements of notices, notification and forms. The <strong>Commission</strong> invites<br />
submissions on the precise nature and content of such prescribed requirements. [Paragraph 7.50]<br />
Chapter 8 – The Duty of Utmost Good Faith – Post Contractual Aspects<br />
11.35 The <strong>Commission</strong> provisionally recommends that the law should continue to provide that an<br />
insured should be prohibited from recovering on a claim by submitting a fraudulent claim or fraudulent<br />
evidence to support a claim; but that it should also provide that an innocent co-insured or beneficiary may<br />
recover on a proportionate basis; provided that the fraudulent insured cannot benefit from the policy.<br />
[Paragraph 8.50]<br />
11.36 The <strong>Commission</strong> provisionally recommends that legislation should set out the mutual duties on<br />
the insured and the insurer in respect of claims handling, so that the principle of good faith would then<br />
remain relevant only to pre-contractual formation of the contract and as an aid to interpretation.<br />
[Paragraph 8.68]<br />
224