08.02.2014 Views

Insurance Contracts CP - Law Reform Commission

Insurance Contracts CP - Law Reform Commission

Insurance Contracts CP - Law Reform Commission

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 9 – Third Party Rights<br />

11.37 The <strong>Commission</strong> provisionally recommends that section 62 of the Civil Liability Act 1961<br />

should be extended to allow a third party to proceed against the insurer where the insured cannot be<br />

located. [Paragraph 9.23]<br />

11.38 The <strong>Commission</strong> provisionally recommends that a third party beneficiary under a contract of<br />

insurance should be defined in legislation as a person who is not a party to the contract but is specified or<br />

referred to in the contract, whether by name or otherwise, as a person to whom the benefit of the<br />

insurance cover provided by the contract extends. [Paragraph 9.36]<br />

11.39 The <strong>Commission</strong> provisionally recommends that, in the context of third party rights in insurance<br />

contracts, it would, in general, be sufficient to protect such rights if the Oireachtas enacted legislation<br />

based on the draft Contract <strong>Law</strong> (Privity of Contract and Third Party Rights) Bill in the <strong>Commission</strong>‘s 2008<br />

Report on Privity of Contract and Third Party Rights. In addition, the <strong>Commission</strong> invites submissions as<br />

to whether additional specific provisions should be enacted in the context of the operation of insurance<br />

contracts in specific settings, for example, in insolvency, on the death of an insured person and during the<br />

completion of a contract for the conveyance of land. [Paragraph 9.41]<br />

Chapter 10 Remedies<br />

11.40 The <strong>Commission</strong> provisionally recommends that avoidance of an insurance policy should no<br />

longer be the main remedy, and that in cases of non-disclosure and misrepresentation the principal<br />

remedy should be one of damages in proportion to the failure by the insured. [Paragraph 10.21]<br />

11.41 The <strong>Commission</strong> provisionally recommends that an insurer should be able to avoid a policy<br />

prospectively upon discovery of a negligent non-disclosure or misrepresentation even if the insurer is<br />

bound to meet any claims submitted by the insured. Should the insurer decide to exercise this right the<br />

avoidance will be effective upon giving the insured written notice of this decision. [Paragraph 10.22]<br />

11.42 The <strong>Commission</strong> provisionally recommends that any damages awarded to an insured arising<br />

from the insurer‘s failure to comply with the proposed post-contractual duties of the insurer should reflect:<br />

(a) general principles of damages in contract law, namely whether the loss is a reasonably foreseeable<br />

consequence of the breach of contract (and in particular, damages that are reasonably foreseeable from<br />

a refusal in bad faith to meet a valid claim); and (b) emerging principles of restitution. [Paragraph 10.42]<br />

11.43 The <strong>Commission</strong> invites submissions as to the period of time within which an insurer should<br />

meet valid claims. [Paragraph 10.43]<br />

11.44 The <strong>Commission</strong> provisionally recommends that legislation should provide that subrogation<br />

rights should be limited in two situations: (a) claims between family members and (b) the employeremployee<br />

relationship. The <strong>Commission</strong> invites submissions as to the precise form these restrictions<br />

should take. [Paragraph 10.101]<br />

225

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!