22.02.2014 Views

Teaching Language arTs in The WaLdorf schooL

Teaching Language arTs in The WaLdorf schooL

Teaching Language arTs in The WaLdorf schooL

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

186<br />

<strong>Language</strong> Arts Compendium<br />

Accord<strong>in</strong>gly, the experimental psychologists will ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> that by<br />

such pa<strong>in</strong>stak<strong>in</strong>g methods we can learn what we ought to be do<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>in</strong> education. But those who recognize more deeply the life of the<br />

human be<strong>in</strong>g as a whole know that you cannot arrive at a real educational<br />

activity by these means any more than you can put together<br />

a live beetle after you have dissected it. This is just not possible. It<br />

is equally impossible when you anatomize the human be<strong>in</strong>g’s soul<br />

activity. Of course, it is <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g, and <strong>in</strong> other connections, can also<br />

be most fruitful to study the anatomy of human soul activity. But it<br />

does not make teachers. This experimental psychology will not, <strong>in</strong><br />

fact, lead to a renewal of education, which can arise only out of an<br />

<strong>in</strong>ner understand<strong>in</strong>g of the human be<strong>in</strong>g. I had to say this lest you<br />

should misunderstand a statement I now want to make, a statement<br />

that will very much irritate those who are attached to the present-day<br />

climate of op<strong>in</strong>ion. <strong>The</strong> statement is naturally one-sided <strong>in</strong> the way<br />

I shall put it, and its one-sidedness must, of course, be counterbalanced.<br />

What do the experimental psychologists discover when they<br />

have anatomized, or should we say tortured (for the procedure is not<br />

pleasant), the soul of their experimental subject? <strong>The</strong>y have discovered<br />

what is, <strong>in</strong> their op<strong>in</strong>ion, an extraord<strong>in</strong>arily significant result<br />

that is written boldly aga<strong>in</strong> and aga<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> educational handbooks as<br />

a f<strong>in</strong>al conclusion. Put <strong>in</strong> clear language, the result, roughly, is that<br />

a passage to be read and learned is more easily reta<strong>in</strong>ed if the content<br />

is understood than if it is not understood. To use the scientific<br />

idiom, it has been determ<strong>in</strong>ed by research that it is expedient first to<br />

discover the mean<strong>in</strong>g of a passage, for then the passage is easier to<br />

learn. Now I must make my heretical statement. If the conclusion<br />

of these experiments is correct, then I could have known it anyway.<br />

I should like to know what person equipped with ord<strong>in</strong>ary common<br />

sense would not already realize that a passage is easier to remember<br />

if you have understood the sense of it than if you have not. <strong>The</strong>re<br />

is no doubt that results of experimental psychology br<strong>in</strong>g to light<br />

the most obvious truths. <strong>The</strong> truisms you f<strong>in</strong>d <strong>in</strong> the textbooks of<br />

experimental psychology are on occasion such that no one who has<br />

not been tra<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> the pursuit of science to accept the fasc<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g<br />

along with the absolutely tedious could possibly be persuaded to

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!