22.02.2014 Views

Teaching Language arTs in The WaLdorf schooL

Teaching Language arTs in The WaLdorf schooL

Teaching Language arTs in The WaLdorf schooL

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Grammar and Spell<strong>in</strong>g<br />

301<br />

then, affects the students. <strong>The</strong> <strong>in</strong>struction <strong>in</strong> grammar is shock<strong>in</strong>g,<br />

literally. It is purely superficial, so that it is one of the worst th<strong>in</strong>gs<br />

done at school. All the stuff <strong>in</strong> the grammar books should actually<br />

be destroyed <strong>in</strong> a big bonfire. Life needs to come <strong>in</strong>to it. <strong>The</strong>n, the<br />

problem is that the students do not get a feel<strong>in</strong>g for what the present<br />

or past tense is when they really should have a lively feel<strong>in</strong>g for<br />

them. <strong>The</strong> genius of language must live <strong>in</strong> the teacher. That is also<br />

true for teach<strong>in</strong>g German. You torture the children with so much<br />

term<strong>in</strong>ology. Do not be angry with me, but it is really so. If you used<br />

mathematical term<strong>in</strong>ology the same way you do grammatical term<strong>in</strong>ology,<br />

you would soon see how horrible it is. All your horrible habits<br />

do not allow you to see how terrible the grammar classes are. This is<br />

caused by the culture that has used language to mistreat Europe for<br />

such a terribly long time, it has used a language that was not liv<strong>in</strong>gly<br />

<strong>in</strong>tegrated, namely, Lat<strong>in</strong>. That is why we have such a superficial<br />

connection to language. That is how th<strong>in</strong>gs are. <strong>The</strong> little amount<br />

of spirit that comes <strong>in</strong>to grammar comes through Grimm, and that<br />

is certa<strong>in</strong>ly someth<strong>in</strong>g we need to admire. Nevertheless, it is only a<br />

little spirit. As it is taught today, grammar is the most spiritless th<strong>in</strong>g<br />

there is, and that gives a certa<strong>in</strong> color to teach<strong>in</strong>g. I must say there<br />

is much more to it than what we do. It is just horrible. We cannot<br />

always have everyth<strong>in</strong>g perfect, which is why I do not always want<br />

to criticize and compla<strong>in</strong>. You need a much better <strong>in</strong>ner relationship<br />

to language, and then your teach<strong>in</strong>g of language will become better.<br />

It is not always the children’s fault when they do not pay attention<br />

<strong>in</strong> the language classes. Why should they be <strong>in</strong>terested <strong>in</strong> what<br />

an adverb is? That is just a barbaric word. Th<strong>in</strong>gs only become better<br />

when you cont<strong>in</strong>ually br<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> relationships, when you repeatedly<br />

come back to the connections between words. If you simply make a<br />

child memorize and yourself have no <strong>in</strong>terest <strong>in</strong> what you had them<br />

memorize, the children will no longer learn anyth<strong>in</strong>g by heart. <strong>The</strong>y<br />

will do that only if you return to the subject aga<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> a different connection<br />

so that they see there is some sense <strong>in</strong> learn<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

[Faculty Meet<strong>in</strong>gs with Rudolf Ste<strong>in</strong>er II, pp. 547-550.]

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!