22.02.2014 Views

Teaching Language arTs in The WaLdorf schooL

Teaching Language arTs in The WaLdorf schooL

Teaching Language arTs in The WaLdorf schooL

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

22<br />

<strong>Language</strong> Arts Compendium<br />

That the children have brought the sense of truth with them can<br />

be seen <strong>in</strong> the fact that they have learned to speak before enter<strong>in</strong>g<br />

school. <strong>Language</strong>, as it were, <strong>in</strong>corporates truth and knowledge. We<br />

need language if we wish to learn about the world. This fact has led<br />

people like Mauthner to assume that everyth<strong>in</strong>g is already conta<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

<strong>in</strong> language. People like Mauthner—who wrote the book Critique<br />

of <strong>Language</strong>—actually believe that we harm human be<strong>in</strong>gs by tak<strong>in</strong>g<br />

them beyond the po<strong>in</strong>t at which they learn to speak. Mauthner<br />

wrote his Critique of <strong>Language</strong> because he did not believe <strong>in</strong> the<br />

world, because of his conviction that human be<strong>in</strong>gs should be left<br />

at a childlike stage, at the time when they learn to speak. Were this<br />

idea to become generally accepted, we would be left with a spiritual<br />

life that corresponds to that of children at the time when they have<br />

learned to speak. This manner of th<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g tends toward produc<strong>in</strong>g<br />

such human be<strong>in</strong>gs who rema<strong>in</strong> at the stage of children who have just<br />

learned to speak. Everyth<strong>in</strong>g else is nowadays rejected as ignorance.<br />

What now matters is that we can enter the concept of imitation<br />

with our feel<strong>in</strong>g and then to understand the concept of authority<br />

as the basis, between us and the children, for the development of<br />

the sense for the beautiful. If we manage to do this up to the time<br />

of puberty, then as the children are grow<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>to their <strong>in</strong>cl<strong>in</strong>ations<br />

toward ideals, the sense for the good is correctly developed. Before<br />

puberty it is through us that the children are motivated to do the<br />

good; through the reciprocal relationship we must affect the children<br />

<strong>in</strong> this way. It is necessary for the eleven-, twelve-, and thirteenyear-old<br />

girls and boys to have the teacher’s authority beh<strong>in</strong>d them,<br />

to feel their teacher’s pleasure and satisfaction when they are do<strong>in</strong>g<br />

someth<strong>in</strong>g that is good. And they should avoid bad actions because<br />

they feel their teacher would be disappo<strong>in</strong>ted. <strong>The</strong>y should be aware<br />

of the teacher’s presence and <strong>in</strong> this way unite with him or her. Only<br />

at puberty should they emancipate themselves from the teacher.<br />

If we consider the children to be already mature <strong>in</strong> first grade, if<br />

we encourage them to voice their op<strong>in</strong>ions and judgments as soon as<br />

they have learned to speak—that is, if we base everyth<strong>in</strong>g on direct<br />

perception [Anschauung]—we leave them at the stage of development<br />

at which they have just learned to speak, and we deny them any fur-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!