22.02.2014 Views

Teaching Language arTs in The WaLdorf schooL

Teaching Language arTs in The WaLdorf schooL

Teaching Language arTs in The WaLdorf schooL

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

34<br />

<strong>Language</strong> Arts Compendium<br />

you will be able to make your own and establish an <strong>in</strong>ner connection<br />

with the children. This is much better than merely adopt<strong>in</strong>g an<br />

outer image. In this way we recognize speech as a relationship between<br />

the human be<strong>in</strong>g and the cosmos. On our own as human be<strong>in</strong>gs,<br />

we would merely rema<strong>in</strong> astonished, but our relationship with the<br />

cosmos <strong>in</strong>vokes sounds from our astonishment.<br />

Human be<strong>in</strong>gs are embedded <strong>in</strong> the cosmos <strong>in</strong> a particular way,<br />

and we can observe this externally. I am say<strong>in</strong>g this because (as you<br />

saw <strong>in</strong> yesterday’s lecture) much depends on the nature of our feel<strong>in</strong>gs<br />

toward grow<strong>in</strong>g children—the degree of reverence we have toward<br />

the mysterious revelation of the cosmos <strong>in</strong> grow<strong>in</strong>g human be<strong>in</strong>gs.<br />

A tremendous amount depends on our ability to develop this feel<strong>in</strong>g<br />

as teachers and educators.<br />

Now let’s take a broader view and look aga<strong>in</strong> at the significant<br />

fact that the human be<strong>in</strong>g takes about eighteen breaths per m<strong>in</strong>ute.<br />

How many breaths is this <strong>in</strong> four m<strong>in</strong>utes? 18 x 4 = 72 breaths. What<br />

is the number of breaths <strong>in</strong> a day? 18 x 60 x 24 = 25,920 per day. I<br />

could also calculate this <strong>in</strong> a different way, by beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g with the<br />

number of breaths <strong>in</strong> four m<strong>in</strong>utes—72. <strong>The</strong>n, <strong>in</strong>stead of multiply<strong>in</strong>g<br />

this number by 24 x 60, I would simply multiply it by 6 x 60,<br />

or 360; I would arrive at the same number of 25,920 breaths per<br />

day: 360 x 72 = 25,920. We can say that our breath<strong>in</strong>g for four m<strong>in</strong>utes—breath<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>in</strong>, breath<strong>in</strong>g out, breath<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>, breath<strong>in</strong>g out—is,<br />

<strong>in</strong> a sense, a microcosmic “day.” <strong>The</strong> sum of 25,920 I obta<strong>in</strong>ed by<br />

multiply<strong>in</strong>g it by 360 relates to this as the process of a whole year: the<br />

day of 24 hours is like a year for our breath<strong>in</strong>g. Now we will look at<br />

our larger breath<strong>in</strong>g process, which is made up of a daily alternation<br />

between be<strong>in</strong>g awake and sleep<strong>in</strong>g. What, basically, is be<strong>in</strong>g awake<br />

and sleep<strong>in</strong>g? It means that we breathe someth<strong>in</strong>g out and breathe<br />

someth<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>. We breathe out our I-be<strong>in</strong>g and astral body when we<br />

go to sleep, and we breathe them <strong>in</strong> when we awake. This occurs<br />

dur<strong>in</strong>g the course of 24 hours. To arrive at a sum for the course of a<br />

year, we must multiply the day by 360. So with the greater breath<strong>in</strong>g<br />

process, <strong>in</strong> one year we complete someth<strong>in</strong>g similar to what<br />

we complete <strong>in</strong> one day with the microcosmic breath<strong>in</strong>g process,<br />

assum<strong>in</strong>g that we multiply what takes place <strong>in</strong> 4 m<strong>in</strong>utes by 360. If

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!